Skip to Content

Gated Net Community and SSL Decryption

Two articles in the current issue of eWeek magazine touch on the topic of Internet Security in a way that is accessible to even those outside the field.In The Gated Net Community, Paul Tinnirello, a CIO in the insurance financial…

Two articles in the current issue of eWeek magazine touch on the topic of Internet Security in a way that is accessible to even those outside the field.

In The Gated Net Community, Paul Tinnirello, a CIO in the insurance financial industry, argues that the deluge of spam and computer viruses is going to cause companies to set up a new Internet in which the price of admission is absolute accountability — presumably through the form of client-certificates and certified servers. Thus, the gated net community would really be an overlay network that would run on top of the existing Internet.

This is an interesting idea, but one that I think is destined to fail.

Let’s say we build a Gated Internet Community, which Tinnirello says would be conceptually similar to a private gated community. If the GIC is a really great place to be, more and more companies and people will want admission. And unlike the gated communities of Long Beach and Seattle (which I’ve visited), this GIC will be able to expand to accept the new immigrants. As the GIC gets larger and larger, some of the members will necessarily be some of the very same people that Tinnirello wishes to keep out. What’s to prevent a spammer from gaining admission to the GIC? What’s to prevent a spammer from paying a friend to get admission to the GIC, and then taking over that person’s account?

Indeed, the Internet itself was once a GIC. I remember back in the 1980s, you could really trust people on the Internet. You knew that basically everybody with an email address was honest, would not cheat you in financial transactions, wasn’t a crook, etc., because if they were, their account would be taken away by the school or business that was giving them access. And if somebody did cheat you, you could always retaliate by going to their sysadmin. That’s back when the Internet was a small town, with less than 100,000 residents.

The second article to check out in this week’s eWeek is Jim Rapoza’s column SSL Filtering Won’t Increase Security. Rapoza argues that companies that are deploying SSL decryption tools to use against their own employees are being stupid and possibly breaking the law.

Sorry, Jim. I know that SSL decryption sounds terrible, but if your company is going to be deploying SSL decryption tools and you don’t like it, don’t use their computers, or find another place to work. Until we want to pass some serious legislation in this country that protects a worker’s right to privacy, any attempts to use technology to get similar guarantees are bound to fail. That’s because technology vs. Technology is a simple arms race, and it’s a race that the people who own the computers and the network will invariably win against their users.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

DeepMind’s cofounder: Generative AI is just a phase. What’s next is interactive AI.

“This is a profound moment in the history of technology,” says Mustafa Suleyman.

What to know about this autumn’s covid vaccines

New variants will pose a challenge, but early signs suggest the shots will still boost antibody responses.

Human-plus-AI solutions mitigate security threats

With the right human oversight, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence can help keep business and customer data secure

Next slide, please: A brief history of the corporate presentation

From million-dollar slide shows to Steve Jobs’s introduction of the iPhone, a bit of show business never hurt plain old business.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.