How to Make a Robot Smile
In a completely new wrinkle on the old adage, “Smile and the world smiles with you, frown and you frown alone,” Japanese researchers are producing a generation of robots that can identify human facial expressions and then respond to them. A team lead by Fumio Hara, a mechanical engineering professor at the Science University of Tokyo, has built a female robotic head that can both recognize and express fear, happiness, surprise, sadness, anger, and disgust.
The main goal of Hara’s project, which is supported by a five-year, $3 million grant from the Japanese government, is not merely to produce a robotic version of monkey-see, monkey-do. Instead, the aim is to create robots that will “empathize” with us and make us feel more comfortable as they read emotional changes expressed in our faces. The researchers expect that such visually emotive robots would be appreciated by factory workers forced to share the line with electronic workmates. The robots may even be useful as teaching aids for certain autistic children who have a communications disorder that makes it difficult for them to understand facial expressions and respond to them correctly.
One surprising feature of Hara’s research is its genesis. During the great economic expansion in Japan in the 1970s, accidents began to occur in newly constructed chemical plants. Hara surmised that plant operators were having difficulty spotting problems by reading banks of digital readout panels. “I thought what they needed was a more global view of what was going on in the plant,” he says, “and if something went wrong, it might be expressed, for example, as a sad face.”
Alas, the engineers soon confronted major hurdles. They found that it was not only difficult to assign facial expressions to the wide range of operational wrongs-from a messy plant floor to dangerous changes in temperature or pressure in the manufacturing process-but also that individual human operators interpreted the same expressions in different ways. The task of tying facial expressions to plant conditions eventually proved so complex that Hara gave up on the research.
But in the mid-1980s, when one of his students expressed interest in robotic research, Hara wondered if the facial-expression approach, although a failure on a plant level, might work between individual robots and humans. He began by making use of work by Paul Ekman, a professor of psychology at the University of California at San Francisco, who divided the movements of human facial expressions into 44 categories, or “action units.” Each action unit would correspond to an individual movement, such as eyebrows going up or down or lips pursing. Combining action units in various ways produced different expressions. For example, disgust entails lowering the brow, wrinkling the nose, and raising the chin.
Beginning in the 1990s, Hara’s group set about creating six expressions-fear, happiness, surprise, sadness, anger, and disgust-which, according to Ekman, are universal to all human cultures. The team constructed an aluminum robot head with 18 air-pressure-driven microactuators-in essence, tiny gears-that could mimic 26 facial movements. The next step was to cast a face in silicone rubber from a mold taken from one of the male students in the laboratory. Because the all-male group desired a female presence in the lab, they feminized the male face by adding a natural hair wig, rouged cheeks, and lipstick. The head was also fitted with false teeth.
Through trial and error, the researchers hooked up tiny wires from the actuators to spots on the mask that, when moved, would recreate the action units required to reproduce the desired six expressions. The robot’s head and eyeballs were also engineered to make humanlike movements. Finally, the Japanese engineers put a tiny camera in the robot’s left eye to scan a human face when positioned about one meter away. A computer connected to the camera determined the person’s expression by searching for brightness variations in different areas of the face.
The computer observed changes in the dark areas-the eyes, mouth, nose, and eyebrows-that occur when a face moves from its neutral, emotionless expression to that showing one of six emotions. Using a neural-network-based self-training program, the computer was eventually able to recognize within 60 milliseconds how changes in the brightness patterns of an individual’s face related to the expressions of a given feeling. Such processing speed combined with refinements in the design of the actuators enabled the robot’s silicone face to respond to changes in expression with humanlike speed.
The robot was surprisingly accurate, correctly guessing the expressions of test subjects, on average, 85 percent of the time. It also fared equally well as a facial actor. In fact, a group of students correctly identified the robot’s expressions 83 percent of the time. By comparison, the same students identified the facial expressions of professional actors 87 percent of the time.
Since accounts of the robot’s performance first appeared in the early 1990s, Hara has been approached by some unexpected parties. These included an artist interested in creating what he believes is a new art form-humans and robots reacting to each other’s expressions-and several psychologists in Japan who think such a robot could help certain handicapped children overcome difficulty manifesting appropriate expressions. The psychologists would have the robot act as a kind of two-way prompt, for example, demonstrating what a happy smile looks like and, after assuming a neutral expression, indicating when the child has smiled by smiling back.
More immediately, Hara’s team is working on a “mouth robot” whose actuators would realistically mimic lip movements during speech. Such a robot might help people with speech or language disabilities, Hara says, because studies show that more than 50 percent of speech understanding stems from
facial expression and movements.
The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it
Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.
How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language
For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.
Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?
An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.
Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death
Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.