The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Technology Review
An IBM project promises cheaper network management.
Rolling out next-generation wireless networks can be painstakingly slow and patchy at the best of times, as the U.S. deployment of 3G has shown. But IBM researchers in China reckon that shifting the signal-processing requirements from base stations into the cloud will make it cheaper and easier to upgrade networks. Ultimately, the approach could lead to wireless networks that can provide better coverage by rapidly adapting to user demand.
A new architecture called the Wireless Network Cloud (WNC) marks a step away from using dedicated hardware in the radio base stations that serve wireless networks like GSM and 3G cell phone networks, says Ling Shao, senior manager of System Software and Appliances at IBM's China Research Lab, in Beijing. With WNC, the radio antennas are physically decoupled from the base stations, with the latter existing virtually, within general-purpose data centers at distant locations.
All of the signal processing--the modulation and encoding of the signals to and from the physical antennas--is carried out using software radio technology, adds Yonghua Lin, manager of IBM's Next Generation Network Appliance. With multicore and multithreading techniques, it is possible to use general-purpose data centers to carry out the signal processing entirely in software, she says.
This allows the network to be managed in a more centralized way, with the raw signals being relayed to and from multiple antennas, which IBM calls "remote radio heads," via optical fibers from as far away as 40 kilometers.
The main attraction to network operators is cost, says Lin. Traditional base stations currently account for about 40 percent of a network's total cost, she says. And yet because of the proprietary design of the hardware used, whenever a network is upgraded, almost all of this equipment has to be replaced. WNC upgrades can be implemented relatively cheaply by installing new software.
The centralized nature of this approach also means operators can manage their networks more efficiently. In areas where cell traffic may vary dramatically depending upon the time of day--business districts where daytime traffic is heavy but evening traffic is light, or residential areas where the opposite is true--WNC should allow the network operator to allocate resources when they're needed, says Lin.
Existing base stations tend to be linked directly to the network gateway, but not to other base stations. Pooling the software radio resources within a data center makes the network much more adaptive to user demand, says Lin. "We can dynamically reallocate resources across different base station cells," she says.
So send more data throught the network?
They are talking about sending raw, undecoded data from the radio to the "cloud". Instead of having a modem at the basestation, which takes a lot of horsepower, they will have the cloud modulate and demodulate the data. This is a very bad idea as raw data takes up a lot more bandwith in the backhaul of the network. So instead of just having users data and control sinaling, this will have raw data from a ADC (analog to digital converter) sent back to some cloud computing. This has several probems. The first is bandwidth, the second is latency, and third is billing and privacy.
This will never happen.
Software Controlled Radio through cloud service remoting.
What it amounts to is a radio that will not work unless the vendor is present and allows it's use. Like any subscription service you won't own your radio you will have to rent it's usability.
This does not go into reliability and corporate lifetime issues. Security and Privacy likewise are not addressed.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Guest
huh?
I have come to expect clear, concise, writing in Technology Review---this is an exception.
I read and re-read this article, and still have little idea of what this article is really about. Is it about not having to install as many cell-phone towers? If so, what does this have to do with cloud computing? Does this have anything to do with the issue of limited bandwidth of wireless signals via phone service?
Reply
peterkaminski
1 Comment
Re: huh?
I think the article is straightforward as long as you understand the concept of software-defined radio (see the article in Wikipedia, for instance). SDR moves the RF modulation and demodulation to software.
SDR for the cellular base stations would be a large step forward, allowing easy changes and upgrades to frequencies and modulations just by upgrading the software.
The computers implementing the SDR could be located at the physical base stations, but Lin is advocating aggregating and centralizing the SDR computing, for the usual reasons a cloud computing approach is chosen.
Reply