The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Internet rights: Dick Durbin and Nicole Wong, vice president and deputy general counsel of Google, at a hearing of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law.
Senator Durbin promises legislation that would force companies to protect human rights.
Yesterday a leading member of Congress put pressure on Internet companies to support human rights and Internet freedom abroad. U.S. Senator Richard Durbin, the Democratic representative from Illinois and the Senate majority whip, said he plans to introduce legislation "that would require Internet companies to take reasonable steps to protect human rights or face civil or criminal liability." An aide later said the proposed legislation had not been written, but would likely be based on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The chances of such a bill passing, or being enforceable if it does, are far from clear. But the issue it would address is pervasive. Right now, many U.S. Internet companies that do business in China, and other countries with government-enforced censorship, actively filter content to comport with local customs or laws. Filtered content includes results on search engines, social networking groups on sites like Facebook, and book listings on retailing sites like Amazon. Google's recent announcement that it would stop censoring search results in China (in the wake of cyber attacks against the company) was a major break from this standard business practice.
At a hearing of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law, which Durbin chairs, he said: "The bottom line is this: with a few notable exceptions, the technology industry seems unwilling to regulate itself and unwilling even to engage in a dialogue with Congress about the serious human rights challenges the industry faces." Durbin invited 30 Internet companies to testify, but only Google did so. Those who took a pass included Facebook, Twitter, Hewlett-Packard, Apple, and McAfee.
Durbin added: "The explosive growth of social networking services like Twitter and Facebook has helped human rights activists organize and publicize human rights violations in Iran and elsewhere. However, repressive governments can use these same tools to monitor and crack down on advocates."
At the hearing, a Google executive said the company was still working through exactly how to fulfill its anti-censorship pledge. "We will not censor our search results in China and we are working toward that end," Nicole Wong, Google's vice president and deputy general counsel, testified in response to a question. "We have many employees on the ground. We recognize both the seriousness and the sensitivity of the decision we are making, and we want to make a way to stop censorship of our search results that is appropriate and responsible."
Three major companies, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo, have joined with an industry-academic coalition called the Global Network Initiative, which was formed three years ago to "collaborate in the advancement of user rights to freedom of expression and privacy" through information technology. Durbin and others have been encouraging other companies to join, but most have begged off, with some saying they don't have the resources to contribute to the effort, and others saying that they are pursuing similar goals on their own.
The Liberty-Privacy Dichotomy between US and EU
A recent Harvard grad's thoughts on the recent Google-Italy debacle and its illustration of the ideological dichotomy of liberty and privacy between the US and EU:
http://stevenduque.com/2010/03/liberty-vs-privacy-the-us-eus-ideological-collision-on-the-internet/
Before WW2 IBM sold census machines to the National Socialist.
This came in very handy when rounding people up for the holocaust.
It is one thing to know a town has Jews and Gypsies. It is another to have a list of names and addresses.
A computer and the information and organization it provides can kill as easy as a gun.
On the other side of this, if Google is helping to crush dissent in China by providing services, what about the companies that are helping them build their economy?
What about our government that allows all of our manufacturing to HAVE to go to China in order to compete in the world market?
It is just such a mess. And our government allowed it to happen.
Oh, but now its Googles fault......
Indeed, our government has been corrupted by corporate greed. Think of the "revolving door" phenomenon, when former government employees go into lobbying and consulting, and make fat profits on the back of the government. The revolving door also works in the opposite direction. Large firms can plant their former employees into top government positions (ex: Dick Cheney a former oilman, and Henry Paulson a former Goldman-Sachs leader).
Our democracy is devolving - the level of public discourse has sunk to really low levels (think of G.W. Bush 2nd, and Sarah Palin), while the amount of corporate money flowing into the political system has skyrocketed (Obama is no saint either).
And then of course, we're left with no moral high ground when we ask/demand other countries to be democratic and civilized. It's all our fault actually.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
gabrielg01
450 Comments
They are working against America.
Our government spends untold amounts of money trying to promote and uphold democracy across the world. We have peacekeepers 'everywhere', we try to support democratic opposition forces, plus the "nation building" wars in Iraq, Afghanistan. Think of the amount of effort and resources that have gone into these things...
Then the corporations come along, and they do exactly the opposite things. They strike deals with dictators for oil, and natural gas extraction. They follow "the law" in totalitarian places like China, Iran (if you've ever been there, you'd know that there is actually no law - these authoritarian govs violate their own laws).
So, as taxpaying citizens we should ask, whose interests are these corporations supporting, and on whose side are they actually on?...
If you're caught supporting some anti-American forces, you would be prosecuted for abetting an enemy. Yet, when Cisco, Yahoo, or Microsoft (and many others) support totalitarian and obviously anti-American regimes, it is business as usual. Isn't that just wrong?
We are accustomed that the average GI Joe shows a (un)healthy amount of patriotism. They risk limb and life for the American values. Shouldn't this apply for higher levels of society as well? What about the patriotism of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Carol Bartz, Steve Ballmer? These are the guys who make the calls to do dirty deals with the Beijing communists and the likes.
Reply
gabrielg01
450 Comments
Re: They are working against America.
Just to follow up on this...there is a recent NYT article on how corporations are screwing up American foreign policy, and the American tax payer:
U.S. Enriches Companies Defying Its Policy on Iran
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/world/middleeast/07sanctions.html
Reply