Technology Review
Search giant compresses the time frame of its results from minutes to seconds.
Gradually, over the past decade, Google has compressed the gap between fresh indexing of the Web from months to mere minutes. On Monday the search giant upped the ante in time-sensitive search, saying that within a few days it will offer search results--including headlines, blogs, tweets, and feeds from Facebook and MySpace--that are just seconds old.
At the same press event, the company unveiled new search features for mobile devices. These include a prototype visual search technology, which allows snapshots of real objects, like signs and buildings, to be used as search "terms." It also tweaked its geographic search--your GPS-derived position now causes Google to offer different search results based on location. For example: if you start a search with the letters "R" and "E" in Boston, the service will suggest various "Red Sox" search results, while the same two letters typed in San Francisco suggest the retailer REI.
However, Google clearly sees up-to-the-second search results as its most important new offering. The search giant has recently come under unfamiliar pressure from Microsoft's revamped search engine, Bing, which also provides some "real-time" search results.
"This is the first time, ever, that any search engine has integrated the real-time Web into the results page," Amit Singhal, a Google fellow, said yesterday in making the announcement.
"Information is being created at a pace I have never seen before--and in this environment, seconds matter," Singhal added. "I cannot emphasize enough--relevance is the foundation of this product. It is relevance, relevance, relevance. There is so much info being generated out there, getting you relevant information is the key to success of a product like this."
The arrival of Twitter, in particular, has focused the attention of many Internet companies on the value of real-time information on the Web. By tapping into customers' interest in time-sensitive information--from Twitter posts to breaking news stories--Google stands to build its audience and, ultimately, its advertising revenues.
A revamped search engine might return different results depending on whether you've researched a subject before.
Search queries aren't always better than traditional trend-spotting methods.
Algorithms judge the relevance of microblog posts containing 140 characters or less.
Yes, this search/surf with cloud/gps/ears/eyes/touch/measurement/etc. capability seems like a new continent to discover. Good luck to all adventurers of good will.
All else equal, whoever convinces that their search/surf scheme offers superior privacy protection from corporate or other malicious profiling could probably attract a quick critical mass of users.
Whoever doesn't tout and clearly explain the nuts and bolts of superior privacy, probably doesn't have it.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
bagapiev
2 Comments
Google Takes Search Real-Time
It is great to see Google get involved in the real-time space. Disclaimer: I am working for Wowd; real-time search is a tremendously exciting problem as it is much more difficult than most people currently believe.
First, Twitter is only a (small) part of what is going on the Web at any given moment. In aggregate, world over, Internet users are clicking on tens of billions of links daily. Twitter activity is a only fraction of percent of that activity.
Of course, Twitter deserves great credit for shining the spotlight on the issue of what people are doing/looking at any moment and real-time in general.
The issue really is what fraction of the Web will Google be indexing in seconds. In addition to the problem of discovery, i.e. what are the new things that have changed, there is also a huge problem of having to decide, in a very short time, which of those new things to actually include in the index.
This is the problem of real-time ranking, which is not only very resource intensive but also depends on other factors besides automation, such as user input.
In any case, we are really looking forward to analyzing the actual details of their offering and seeing what is there, as well as what is not :)
Reply