Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wikipedia Gets Ready for a Video Upgrade

Continued from page 1

By David Talbot

Friday, June 19, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Congress-ipedia: Among the early sources that will be tapped for video enhancements to Wikipedia pages is Metavid, an open-source repository of Congressional speeches and hearings.
Credit: Metavid.org

The project also includes developing Web tools to create smooth methods for transferring and editing videos. When a Wikipedia editor finds relevant snippets, he will be able to preview them, and set the "in" and "out" points, without having to worry about file conversions. "Presently, the work flow is pretty atrocious" for people trying to download, convert, and edit video, says Dale, citing the notoriously confusing array of incompatible video formats now in use. With the new Wikipedia system, "people will be able to easily inject media into pages, in a way that wasn't possible before," he says.

Kaltura is helping develop the tools needed to simplify video importing. "It's uploading, importation--all the things that have to happen before you can edit the files," says Shay David, CTO and cofounder of Kaltura. The system will be publicly demonstrated for the first time this afternoon at the Open Video Conference in New York City.

Erik Moeller, deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, says that he hopes the effort will help promote wider access to vast stores of historical material, political speeches, interviews, documentaries, and anything else that could figure into Wikipedia, the world's seventh most popular website. "It is sad and unfortunate that the public broadcasters are not the ones leading this movement," Moeller says. "The mission should be to do whatever they can do to maximize distribution, and I'm not seeing that right now."

Comments

  • A Little Latitude, Please
    Wikipedia is a pearl of great price and video will enhance it. The eight hundred pound gorilla is DRM (copyright). I would hope that the content owners would give Wiki a bit of latitude. I expect they will not.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Phineas
    06/19/2009
    Posts:84
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: A Little Latitude, Please
      What I have seen is that there are two big issues in the open vs. commercial video formats.  One issue is DRM.  If you are a publisher that has to make a living (or planning on it) on you content, or you just don't want the whole world to see your content, you may be wary of giving it all away once and for all.  The second issue I see is the tools environment.  The commercial vendors offer lots of tools, making it easy to create the content...and of course the tools is where they really make their money.  My company has developed a solution that provides publishers a third way.  We have developed a OGG/Theora/Vorbis player which can be deployed using with a la carte support for DRM/advertising/sponsorship/subscription so you can protect and/or make money of the content if that is a requirement but you don't need to pay one of the major vendors for tools. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      fchieux27
      06/30/2009
      Posts:1
  • Open Source Formats
    I'm thrilled to hear that the video formats will need to be open.  While ogg video is still not as good as some other formats, it's open, and .flv and .mov files are a nightmare to deal with if you want to do anything besides play it in the proprietary players offered by the manufacturers. 

    I love the closed caption search integration, hopefully this will inspire some standards there as well.

    Kudos to the wikipedia team!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tacman1123
    06/19/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Wikipedia already supports video
    This isn't any big news. Wikipedia already supports video and has supported it for at least a year now.

    The main problem is that currently video on Wikipedia is far from easy, requiring non-commercial "free" video codecs like Ogg/Theora/Vorbis and annoying, difficult to use command-line transcoders (ffmpeg2theora), and no guidance on video streaming rates or acceptable video resolutions. For quite a while they capped file uploads at 20 megabytes, but recently increased to 100 megabytes.

    (I am currently one of the big video contributors to Wikipedia and the Commons. Some of my videos can be found in the "Silo", "Baler", and "Otto engine" articles.)

    I don't know how Wikipedia intends to get around the free licensing issue for video codecs. Most of the stuff on archive.org is encoded with non-free codecs like MPEG. Unless Wikipedia plans to transcode all that to the free Theora encoder? I suppose that can be done, but it seems unlikely.

    For a long time Wikipedia has held firm against Adobe Flash even though it would make diagrams and illustrations FAR easier to provide in articles. If they are going to backslide on non-free MPEG from archive.org, will they now allow Flash as well?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DMahalko
    06/22/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Wikipedia already supports video
      We address the command line transcoder issue by integrating an extension called firefogg. ... It lets users choose any local file in any format and handles the transcoding and uploading of the file.

      We have worked with archive.org to make all their footage available in ogg format.

      We only plan to support free formats. Diagrams and figures should be possible via web technologies like svg & styled html. We will want to work on writing figure editor interfaces in javascript.

      more about the mediaWiki media projects
      Rate this comment: 12345

      mdale
      06/23/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.