Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wolfram Alpha and Google Face Off

Continued from page 1

By David Talbot

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Market watch: Entering “GM Ford” into the Wolfram Alpha engine produced tables comparing company data and stock prices, including charts plotting the price history.
Credit: Wolfram Research

VARIATIONS: Adding the word "in" changed everything. When I tweaked the search query to say "10 pounds in kilograms," the Wolfram site gave me the correct conversion: 10 pounds equals 4.536 kilograms. It also gave me the volumes (in various units) of 10 pounds of water. In a final, somewhat cheesy touch, it also told me that 10 pounds was 1.8 times the weight of Wolfram's book, A New Kind of Science. In Google's case, this revised search term produced the helpful calculated result up top: 10 pounds = 4.5359237 kilograms.

When I put in "10 lbs kgs," Alpha gave me the calculated result (the assumption was that I wanted multiplication), as it had with the full words. Google gave me metric conversion sites--the top one was a "Russian Brides Cyber Guide." (It offers both brides and metric conversions.)

When I tried "10 pds kgs," Alpha choked and didn't understand. Google helpfully asked if I meant "pounds" and gave me metric conversion sites, but not the calculated result.

SEARCH TERM: light bulb

WOLFRAM ALPHA: I was expecting some facts and figures on this ubiquitous technology but got a message saying that Wolfram Alpha "isn't sure what to do with your input."

GOOGLE: I got several links--starting with a Wikipedia entry--explaining what a light bulb is and providing some history.

VARIATIONS: When I tried "light bulb inventor," I got similar results: Alpha drew a blank, but Google gave useful links. When I tried "first light bulb," Alpha provided a table explaining that the light bulb was patented in 1878; under "people involved," it cited Thomas Edison.

SEARCH TERM: Aspirin Tylenol

WOLFRAM ALPHA: Alpha gave me molecular diagrams for aspirin and acetaminophen and lots of scientific information comparing their molecular weights, boiling points, vapor pressure, and so forth.

GOOGLE: Usefully (to nonchemists suffering from headaches), the top link was to a Wiki-answers page telling people whether they can take aspirin and Tylenol together. Other links gave information about toxicity, danger to kidneys, and the like.

SEARCH TERM: Stanford Harvard

WOLFRAM ALPHA: I got tables comparing data from the two schools: size of student bodies--broken down by full-time, part-time, undergraduate, and graduate--plus the number of undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees awarded, and similar data. Alpha listed Stanford's tuition as $25,000, which is incorrect, and no tuition for Harvard. As with all of Alpha's results, it gave me sources against which to check the information.

GOOGLE: Google gave me a collection of links (starting with a discussion board for students trying to make a college decision) and various news stories containing the two terms.

Comments


  • smihael
    05/05/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • comparisons not quite applicable
    This is fair and interesting data, but my concern is that you're not using these two sites appropriately. From what I understand, one of the chief benefits of Wolfram Alpha is that it can produce results based on natural-language questions, whereas Google relies on more machine-based queries.

    Putting in multiple-word keywords naturally favors Google, because you're not really asking a question there - you're just searching for data. In this instance, Google is most likely going to return more of the "right" kind of data that you're looking for, because they've had 10 years to finetune their algorithm in this way.

    I think a more practical test would be to think about a few real-life questions you want answered, and then put in the best Google search you can think of, and compare that to simply asking Wolfram Alpha the question.

    These sites/engines are tools, and it's tough to compare them by telling them to do the same thing the same way. You have to use them to their strengths.

    Thanks for the article, though - interesting data. Can't wait to try it out.

    Nate

    ItStartsWith...
    05/05/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: comparisons not quite applicable
      Post a pair of queries and I'll try it out.   But I think it's fair to use identical search terms -- otherwise how can you compare the two?  
      Anyway, I'd wager that most average users don't/won't know how to customize a query (though they might learn over time).  Thanks for your comment.

      david.talbot...
      05/05/2009
      Posts:6
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.