The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Firefox for phones: Mitchell Baker is the chairman of the Mozilla Foundation, an open-source software organization responsible for the Firefox browser. The foundation is building a browser for mobile devices.
Mozilla
Mozilla's chairman explains why mobile devices need an open-source browser.
There's no doubt that it's getting easier to access the Web on a mobile device. Thanks to the iPhone and Apple's Web browser, Safari, millions of people feel as though they finally have the Internet in their pocket. But there's still a lot of work that needs to be done in order to allow for the kind of innovation on the mobile Web that is possible on the traditional Web, says Mitchell Baker, chairman of Mozilla, maker of the Firefox browser.
Baker has been instrumental in building the open-source software community that gave the world Firefox, a popular alternative to desktop browsers such as Internet Explorer and Safari. But now Mozilla has turned its attention to the mobile Web. Last October, the foundation announced an initiative to build the first, fully open Web browser for mobile devices. As an open-source software project, the browser will be built using code from software programmers from all over the world. The hope is to spur innovation in an industry that's famous for locking out software developers.
Technology Review's information technology editor, Kate Greene, caught up with Baker at the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco last week to ask about her vision of the mobile Web.
Technology Review: What progress have you made since you announced a mobile Firefox initiative last fall?
Mitchell Baker: The first thing that we have done is make sure that the size and memory requirement of our code are more suitable for cell phones and related devices. We hadn't actually focused on that in the past years. We focused on building the user experience, and the [software developer] ecosystem, and making a browser that's flexible. So the performance characteristics of the code that runs Firefox are dramatically different than they were six months ago. They are equal to any mobile browser, and better than some, depending on the tests. We've done a lot of the hard basic engineering work that needs to get done.
We've also started the prototype development. There's a project called Fennec, which is another type of fox. We've released prototypes of this, not products. This is the classic Mozilla way of development: release early and release often.
TR: When do you expect a mobile Firefox to be available to the general public?
MB: We can expect to see things that the general public can play with sometime this year. I'm not sure it'll be a completely polished product, but it'll be within a range that's usable.
"Mozilla's chairman explains why mobile devices need an open-source browser."
Simply put: $.
How long Microsoft grant one use of Firefox? 30,60,73 days? After reading The Truth about Linux I'm very scared of Firefoxes OSs. I don't want all I do with my computers to be owned by Microsoft as Firefoxes probably has many of the Microsoft Intelectual Property inside. I don't see a sticker on it like 'Intel Inside". But it uses Internet Explore. It must. How can it not? The Firefoxes must log to IE to download the internets from the pipes. If I reboot it after 30 days, am I still libel for infringment and accessory? Will they come after me? I don't want to get sued. I don't have enought money to pay for defense. I just want to see the internets on my mobile.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
wowwow1@gmail.com
1 Comment
X86 processor (or emulator on ARM) is foundational
Firefox is surely on to a noble cause. The foundational architectural challenge lies in somehow emulating the X86-ISA on ARM processor/s underneath. Close collaboration with ARM and codec vendors such as Flash will be required. Today in iPhone, Apple has to literally transcode every Youtube video you watch - that's not a scalable model. Firefox also has the advantage of learning from Java history. Another vector to explore will be using an extra ARM core dedicated to emulating and executing the X86 code!
Reply
coldspell
1 Comment
Re: X86 processor (or emulator on ARM) is foundational
wow.
* Firefox is not emulating x86 on ARM.
* Adobe Flash is not a codec.
* The iPhone does not transcode youtube movies on the fly. youtube transcodes movies into multiple formats when they are first uploaded.
* I've never heard of any mobile phones with multi-core ARM chipsets.
Reply
bugme
29 Comments
Re: X86 processor (or emulator on ARM) is foundational
"codec vendors such as Flash will be required"
Flash isn't a vendor either.
Reply