Web

The Times Emulates Print on the Web

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Tuesday, May 2, 2006
  • By Wade Roush

Do readers actually care whether a publication's website resembles its print version? Perhaps not. Growth in online news reading has been robust, despite the cluttered and unpredictable appearance of most online newspapers. Some 43 percent of people with broadband Internet connections at home turn to the Internet for news at least once a day, while only 38 percent pick up a local newspaper, and a mere 17 percent look at a national newspaper, according to a 2005 survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project. On the other hand, online viewership might have grown even more briskly, and penetrated other, older audiences, if websites looked more like print publications.

It is known that the Web's limitations are a huge bother for designers, who have struggled for a decade to create print-like layouts within the generally meager limits of HTML, written by computer scientists, which was never intended to support sophisticated graphic design. "PCs may have opened up the door for anybody to be a designer, but they've also put in some huge restrictions, in terms of HTML and what somebody can actually do," says Sarah Quinn, a member of the visual journalism faculty at the Poynter Institute, a journalism school in St. Petersburg, FL.

There are many ways to convert print layouts to electronic form. The most popular is Adobe Systems' Portable Document Format (PDF), designed to ensure that a page of text will have the same appearance whether it's viewed on a computer screen or printed out on paper. Technology companies such as Zinio use PDF as the underlying format for online periodicals. (Zinio produces Technology Review's digital edition.) But PDF-based documents have their own limitations; text does not reflow when a window is resized, for example.

To some commentators, the Times Reader project, Zinio editions, and other efforts to replicate the look of a print publication online are throwbacks to a pre-Internet past in which newspaper editors spoonfed news to the public. "Why not design the next frontier for the sharing of news [to take] advantage of all the new opportunities technology permits -- linking, conversation, multimedia, search, selectivity, depth, currency? Oh, yeah, it was already invented. It's the Web," writes Jeff Jarvis, a critic and columnist who writes the popular blog BuzzMachine. Jarvis characterizes the Times Reader and alternatives such as the British Guardian Digital Edition as attempts to "grasp desperately onto a past that is disappearing."

But with Microsoft's new presentation technology, Web-like interactivity doesn't have to come at the expense of the design wisdom of the past, say designers. "If a newspaper or a book or a magazine or a billboard follows the classic principles of design -- dominance and hierarchy on a page, and particularly designing on a grid -- that's very helpful to anyone looking at it," says Quinn. "This new technology enables the flexibility to use some of those principles online."

Microsoft says it will eventually release software development tools so that other publications can create their own versions of the Times Reader. Test versions of the Reader will be available to Internet users this summer, the company said.

Home page image courtesy of The New York Times.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (t)

  • 2114 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

Good Morning, stupid Microsoft: What about including 'real' CSS in IE Browser?

Then there would be no need for any screenreader to be consistent with and in control of your design...
Even PDA's can cope with standard CSS, so support it.

Reply

Guest (Sarb)

  • 2114 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

Stupid Microsoft

Yes but CSS is owned by Microsoft, and there may seem to be little milage in it as there can be no new "Isn't Microsoft Technology so Good" let's get Vista!

Reply

Guest (Paul N.)

  • 2114 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

Microsoft owns CSS -- NOT!

No, Microsoft does not own CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) -- neither in the sense of owning intellectual property nor in the sense of embracing the technology.  The CSS specification is at w3c.org, not microsoft.com.  Even Microsoft's too-little, too-late effort IE7 will not bring their browser up to community standards.

Reply

Guest (pandy)

  • 2068 Days Ago
  • 06/17/2006

Think again!

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,860,073.PN.&OS=PN/5,860,073&RS=PN/5,860,073

http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Disclosures

Reply

Guest (Mark Freeman)

  • 2114 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

Great website for newspapers

Through my public library I can access over 200 papers from around the world on the day that they are publish and see them in their orignial format.

Great website and interface - not sure how far you can go without a membership but check it out...

http://www.pressdisplay.com/pressdisplay/viewer.aspx

Reply

Guest (Donald Ravey)

  • 2114 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

The jury is out

My first reaction is like the first one, about CSS.  We already have a platform neutral tool.  It will take some experience with MS's WPF to demonstrate whether it is really a new and better publishing tool, or whether it is just another MS marketing tool.

Reply

Guest (Walter)

  • 2113 Days Ago
  • 05/03/2006

How is this different from Adobe Acrobat?

I'm sure it must have *some* advantage, but until I have a chance to review it, I have to say it doesn't seem to add much beyond Acrobat. (Or plain old CSS).

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Matt)

  • 2113 Days Ago
  • 05/03/2006

reflow.

This is different if only because it allows for rehyphenation and reflow when the window size changes - which means that the article author/designer doesn't specify hard line breaks - the Reader software does. That lets you target deskbound machines, laptops, cellphones, PDAs, wall-mounted displays and the like, without having to re-create the source material. PDF can't do that.

That said, I wish they'd just release a browser that was CSS compliant.

Reply

Guest (Art Hampton)

  • 2113 Days Ago
  • 05/03/2006

No horizontal scrolling

Acrobat blows chunks. Well, maybe it's just that all the uses I've seen of it suck big time. This is the computer age. We need to be able to easily search through documents, and they should come with comprehensive indexes that let the reader quickly jump to issues that seem of interest. Check out Investors Business Daily for an example of how NOT to do it. The online version is merely a page for page pdf of the paper version. To get around in it you must scroll vertically AND horizontally. No hyperlinks, just really stupid. If it takes a Microsoft to fix this, more power to them. I detest Microsoft, but this really needs to be done.

Reply

Guest (Gerald)

  • 2113 Days Ago
  • 05/03/2006

Acrobat is just a tool

With acrobat file, it is possible to set up an index, as well as a table of contents and other cool little gizmos, but the person creating the file just needs to do a little extra work.  It sounds like the people at that Investors Business Daily wanted to put as little effort into their pdf files as possible, and so came out with a crummy product.

Reply

Guest (Neilo)

  • 2113 Days Ago
  • 05/03/2006

Typical

Add a fisher-price interface and a MS logo.  Stupid people will buy it just because it's "pretty"

Reply

Guest (Roger C.)

  • 2111 Days Ago
  • 05/05/2006

Old hat repackaged

Hate to tell these folks, but this is really old hat. See:

http://epaperdaily.timesofindia.com/

for a fully navigable online representation of a newspaper that's been available for 2+ years to my certain knowledge.

Regards,


Roger C,

Reply

Guest (SK)

  • 2108 Days Ago
  • 05/08/2006

Not sure what the big deal is...

Not sure what the big deal is, indian newspapers like 'TimesOfIndia' had this ability more than 2 years ago. Maybe i'm missing something here..

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

A Social-Media Decoder

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

First Solar

Cotendo

Suntech

Lattice Power

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement