Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 Next »

March 2006

Confessions of a Scan Artist

You, too, can commit your life to digital -- and throw away your paper records.

By Simson Garfinkel

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

As our lives become more digitized, a number of eminent computer scientists are starting to warn that our most treasured family photos, heartfelt correspondence, and legal documents might be irretrievably lost if we do not print them on acid-free paper and safely store them in a cool, dark, and dry place. After all, the original Declaration of Independence, written on parchment, is still on display in Washington, DC, but digital documents from even 1990-vintage personal computers can be difficult to read, because few people have five-and-a-half-inch floppy-disk drives anymore.

I think those computer scientists have got it wrong. The problem with paper documents is that they are forever vulnerable to destruction -- from fire or flood, for example -- because they exist in one place. I prefer electronic documents, which can be easily copied and "backed up" to different locations -- different hard drives, different buildings, and even different states. And though it does require dedication to manage your life this way, today's technology makes it easier than ever.

I bought my mother an Apple eMac with a high-speed Internet connection. Every day my family's digital photo album is copied to her computer. Mom gets to see up-to-the-minute photos of her grandchildren, thanks to Apple's marvelous screen saver, and I get reliable off-site backup. Other people I know simply send CD-ROMs to their parents every few months. Either way, the ease of making useful off-site backups demonstrates one of digital documents' real advantages over paper.

Some of the paper documents that show up at my house, like credit card bills, annual tax statements, and even snapshots from my mother's disposable camera, aren't as easily rendered into digital form, of course. It's all too tempting to throw them into a file cabinet or photo box. Moving them into the digital domain takes work; taking the extra step, and throwing away the paper original, used to require an act of faith. But digital documents are worth the effort, and we should all be creating them. These days, it's relatively easy to understand which formats will survive and be readable in 20 years' time and which are likely to go the way of the eight-track tape.

The key to survival, it turns out, is openness. File formats that are published and can be implemented without payment of a licensing fee -- formats, that is, that embody the principles of open-source software -- survive, because knowledge about how to read them can be freely incorporated into many applications. Other file formats die when the companies behind them stumble.

Two modern file formats likely to enjoy long-term durability are the Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF) and the JPEG image format. That's because both of these formats are public, and there is a wide collection of software compatible with them. Yes, the source code for Acrobat itself is proprietary, but PDF files can be directly opened on the Macintosh platform without the use of any Adobe code. They can also be viewed on Linux machines with an open-source program called GhostScript. JPEG, meanwhile, is widely used by millions of digital cameras and practically every computer that's sold today. I cannot imagine a future computer system that could not read the JPEG file format. Your digital photos are safe -- provided that you have good backups.

[1] 2 3 Next »
March/April 2006

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April 2006 issue?

This article is from the March/April 2006 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Legal docs
    Guest (Chris Miller) on 04/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I'm in agreement with your ideas for personal documents and images, but will a scanned version of a credit card bill or tax statement be accepted as legal evidence?

    As we all know, it's far too easy to 'photoshop' such images in ways that are hard to detect.  What is needed is for financial e-documents to be authenticated and digitally signed by the originator.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • ScanSnap for Mac, too
    Guest (DVB) on 04/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    There is a ScanSnap for Macs that has a slightly different model number, but has the same functionality: ScanSnap fi-5110EOXM . Work like a charm, best peripheral purchase I've ever made, and am really clearing off that desk (finally)!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • You are ahead of the curve :-)
      Guest (rer) on 04/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I love it :-) ... but $500 for a scanner ; $500 for software ; plus consistent expenditure of time. Yeah, *maybe* the people who read TR have this kind of money to drop, but certainly not very representative.

      The biggest concern backing up.  Yeah, you obviously back up, but, how many other people that you know, TR readers or not, do this *consistently*? 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Figiting over Digiting; Where we get more info?
    Guest (John MacGregor) on 04/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Impressed by the article and glad some computer smarties are moving in this direction, which is where I’d like to go but lack the smarts.  Where can those of us who like the article go to find out more?  Are there usegroup or websites where this is discussed and other techniques are outlined?  Where on theinternet (or in books; I still remember them) can we go to find out more? 
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Great Article
    Guest (Dorical) on 04/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I like your point of view regarding keeping digital records of all your different documents. I too am a person who loves to take digital records of all my documents. However, I sometimes question whether I spend too much time "recording" and not enough time "creating". It's time consuming and  mind consuming to think of ways to store and search. Losing some records is like forgeting. Sometimes we need to forget just not to move on to new ideas and things.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology