Web

The Wikipedia War

(Page 2 of 3)

  • Friday, December 16, 2005
  • By Eric Hellweg

Evidently, the motive for encyclo-vandalism is sometimes just humor. According to a report in the New York Times, the contributor who entered false information about Seigenthaler (claiming he'd played a role in Robert Kennedy's assassination) was playing a joke on some friends. Since then, the perpetrator, Brian Chase, who was ferreted out, has apologized to Seigenthaler, who accepted his apology.

I tested the Wikipedia correction process while reporting for this article. After logging on, without giving an e-mail address, I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained.

There are real, perhaps inevitable weaknesses in Wikipedia's system. But the Siegenthal ordeal seems to have unleashed a disproportionate number of Wikipedia critics. News site Official Wire, run by Baou.com, is now posting stories that allege “Nazi-style behavior” among Wikipedia contributors and editors.

And this week, a site called WikipediaClassAction.org went live, soliciting feedback and, more significantly, instances of monetary damages caused by Wikipedia. Their goal is to launch a class-action lawsuit against the site. When I called the phone number listed on that site, the person who answered refused to give his name, then rattled off a long series of allegations against Wikipedia. The charges felt specious to me, and were quite vitriolic.

A quick piece of sleuthing turned up a likely explanation: Baou.com also runs an organization called QuakeAid, the Wikipedia entry for which cites some questionable circumstances surrounding the organization and its founders. Furthermore, some of the anti-Wikipedia articles found on Official Wire are written by “Jennifer Monroe,” the same name listed as having registered the domain WikipediaClassAction.org.

Although Baou's actions imply a multi-pronged revenge campaign, some anti-Wikipedians appear to have more reasonable complaints. Daniel Brandt, the man behind wikipedia-watch.org (and also Google-watch.org), says that until Wikipedia drops its policy of allowing anonymous posts and edits, the quality of the site will suffer. “For research purposes you ought to be able to find [authors],” he says.

But Brandt, too, has a personal reason to be upset with Wikipedia. He admits his opposition to the site came after he learned that it included a page about him with links he considered unflattering. Brandt was a prominent draft resister in the 1960s.

Print

Related Articles

'Web 2.0' Has Arrived

It's unstoppable, say the digerati in San Francisco this week: Users are taking over the Web.

Socialized Computing

The founder of craigslist is obsessed with customer service.

Free the Encyclopedias!

Got a yen to write? A free Web-based encyclopedia takes contributions from anyone.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Aaron E. Klemm)

  • 2251 Days Ago
  • 12/16/2005

Baou and what Wikipedia has to do

First, its unfortunate that you legitimize Baous actions and the inflammatory articles on news.baou.com. They dont deserve to be valid voices in any discussion of Wikipedia.

Second, your conclusion is a bit overblown. Maybe Wikipedia *doesnt* have to adopt new tactics. I would argue the process is working despite recent and occasional problems.

The information and usefulness of Wikipedia content is improving daily--so whats wrong?

Reply

Guest (Ivor Smith)

  • 2251 Days Ago
  • 12/16/2005

The wikipedia war

An informative article for I, as it shook me out of my nievity, that all that I read on-line, must be factual!

Reply

Guest (funny article)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

funny that the writer  s##t him self while trying to discredit wiki.

unfortunetly the writers atempt to prove the problems with the system just proved it works better than he knows.

he wrote
I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained

however
Faithful [H] reader Peter Hamilton (who I’m assuming is a Roy Orbison fan) pointed out that the information of Costello and Waits playing together is indeed true. A quick google search netted me the tell tale result. A simple click under Actors on the more link revealed that both aforementioned artists did indeed play this concert together

Reply

Guest (funny article)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

funny that the writer  s##t him self while trying to discredit wiki.

unfortunetly the writers atempt to prove the problems with the system just proved it works better than he knows.

he wrote
I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained

however
Faithful [H] reader Peter Hamilton (who I’m assuming is a Roy Orbison fan) pointed out that the information of Costello and Waits playing together is indeed true. A quick google search netted me the tell tale result. A simple click under Actors on the more link revealed that both aforementioned artists did indeed play this concert together

Reply

Guest (James)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

Wrong

Too bad Tom Waits DID play with Elvis Costello.  You think the author could at least check information he was trying to falsify.

Reply

Guest (TR editor)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

need link

Re: Wrong by James: Give us a link to a reliable source saying that Waits played with Elvis Costello in the 1990s--and well even credit you! Thanks. -- Editor

Reply

Otto42

1 Comment

  • 370 Days Ago
  • 02/09/2011

Re: need link

You could just watch the video and see them together instead:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cast-crew/B0000203YR/

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (TR editor)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

need link

Re: Wrong by James: Give us a link to a reliable source saying that Waits played with Elvis Costello in the 1990s--and well even credit you! Thanks. -- Editor

Reply

Guest (Max)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

Wikipedia works and at the same time does not work..

My profs at the University used to say that any reference to Wikipedia in any paper you submit, will be considered a minus and crossed-out and I think they are right about it. It is a good idea to get a first glimpse at a problem by looking at the wiki, but for more information, one should consider standard references and books.

However, an entire unnoticed problem is bias in the wikipedia. It is not so much about factual errors, but rather the supremacy of political belief systems. While this is not a big deal in the US wiki, it is in Europe. I have seen that socialist content doesnt allow any criticism on their pages, while they censor anything that goes beyond their political scheme. This might be a big problem in the future and is why I abstain from using any social science pages from the Wiki.

Reply

Guest (Sly)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

Europe

What you are saying about Europe content is quite wrong. But may be its just that you dont agree with the content.
When you use censorship to tell the truth, its only the truth of the censor.

Reply

Guest (Sly)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

Europe

What you are saying about Europe content is quite wrong. But may be its just that you dont agree with the content.
When you use censorship to tell the truth, its only the truth of the censor.

Reply

Guest (Andy)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

Wikipedia  accuracy

It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?

Reply

Guest (Eric Hellweg)

  • 2247 Days Ago
  • 12/20/2005

Tom Waits and Elvis Costello

While I dont doubt that Tom Waits and Elvis Costello played together some time in the 1990s, my false Wikipedia entry said that he played with Tom Waits at the Raven Theater in Healdsburg CA in 1996. I was at that show, and have a recording of it. Elvis Costello did not play.

Reply

Guest (Eric Hellweg)

  • 2247 Days Ago
  • 12/20/2005

Tom Waits and Elvis Costello

While I dont doubt that Tom Waits and Elvis Costello played together some time in the 1990s, my false Wikipedia entry said that he played with Tom Waits at the Raven Theater in Healdsburg CA in 1996. I was at that show, and have a recording of it. Elvis Costello did not play.

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Andy)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

Wikipedia  accuracy

It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?

Reply

Guest (Aaron E. Klemm)

  • 2251 Days Ago
  • 12/16/2005

Baou and what Wikipedia has to do

First, its unfortunate that you legitimize Baous actions and the inflammatory articles on news.baou.com. They dont deserve to be valid voices in any discussion of Wikipedia.

Second, your conclusion is a bit overblown. Maybe Wikipedia *doesnt* have to adopt new tactics. I would argue the process is working despite recent and occasional problems.

The information and usefulness of Wikipedia content is improving daily--so whats wrong?

Reply

Guest (Ivor Smith)

  • 2251 Days Ago
  • 12/16/2005

The wikipedia war

An informative article for I, as it shook me out of my nievity, that all that I read on-line, must be factual!

Reply

Guest (James)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

Wrong

Too bad Tom Waits DID play with Elvis Costello.  You think the author could at least check information he was trying to falsify.

Reply

Guest (Max)

  • 2249 Days Ago
  • 12/18/2005

Wikipedia works and at the same time does not work..

My profs at the University used to say that any reference to Wikipedia in any paper you submit, will be considered a minus and crossed-out and I think they are right about it. It is a good idea to get a first glimpse at a problem by looking at the wiki, but for more information, one should consider standard references and books.

However, an entire unnoticed problem is bias in the wikipedia. It is not so much about factual errors, but rather the supremacy of political belief systems. While this is not a big deal in the US wiki, it is in Europe. I have seen that socialist content doesnt allow any criticism on their pages, while they censor anything that goes beyond their political scheme. This might be a big problem in the future and is why I abstain from using any social science pages from the Wiki.

Reply

Guest (Andy)

  • 2248 Days Ago
  • 12/19/2005

Wikipedia  accuracy

It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

A Social-Media Decoder

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Nissan

iRobot

Cellular Dynamics International

Zynga

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement