Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Wikipedia War

Continued from page 1

By Eric Hellweg

Friday, December 16, 2005

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Evidently, the motive for encyclo-vandalism is sometimes just humor. According to a report in the New York Times, the contributor who entered false information about Seigenthaler (claiming he'd played a role in Robert Kennedy's assassination) was playing a joke on some friends. Since then, the perpetrator, Brian Chase, who was ferreted out, has apologized to Seigenthaler, who accepted his apology.

I tested the Wikipedia correction process while reporting for this article. After logging on, without giving an e-mail address, I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained.

There are real, perhaps inevitable weaknesses in Wikipedia's system. But the Siegenthal ordeal seems to have unleashed a disproportionate number of Wikipedia critics. News site Official Wire, run by Baou.com, is now posting stories that allege “Nazi-style behavior” among Wikipedia contributors and editors.

And this week, a site called WikipediaClassAction.org went live, soliciting feedback and, more significantly, instances of monetary damages caused by Wikipedia. Their goal is to launch a class-action lawsuit against the site. When I called the phone number listed on that site, the person who answered refused to give his name, then rattled off a long series of allegations against Wikipedia. The charges felt specious to me, and were quite vitriolic.

A quick piece of sleuthing turned up a likely explanation: Baou.com also runs an organization called QuakeAid, the Wikipedia entry for which cites some questionable circumstances surrounding the organization and its founders. Furthermore, some of the anti-Wikipedia articles found on Official Wire are written by “Jennifer Monroe,” the same name listed as having registered the domain WikipediaClassAction.org.

Although Baou's actions imply a multi-pronged revenge campaign, some anti-Wikipedians appear to have more reasonable complaints. Daniel Brandt, the man behind wikipedia-watch.org (and also Google-watch.org), says that until Wikipedia drops its policy of allowing anonymous posts and edits, the quality of the site will suffer. “For research purposes you ought to be able to find [authors],” he says.

But Brandt, too, has a personal reason to be upset with Wikipedia. He admits his opposition to the site came after he learned that it included a page about him with links he considered unflattering. Brandt was a prominent draft resister in the 1960s.

Comments

  • Baou and what Wikipedia has to do
    First, its unfortunate that you legitimize Baous actions and the inflammatory articles on news.baou.com. They dont deserve to be valid voices in any discussion of Wikipedia.

    Second, your conclusion is a bit overblown. Maybe Wikipedia *doesnt* have to adopt new tactics. I would argue the process is working despite recent and occasional problems.

    The information and usefulness of Wikipedia content is improving daily--so whats wrong?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Aaron E. Klemm)
    12/16/2005
    Posts:1
  • The wikipedia war
    An informative article for I, as it shook me out of my nievity, that all that I read on-line, must be factual!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ivor Smith)
    12/16/2005
    Posts:1
    • funny that the writer  s##t him self while trying to discredit wiki.
      unfortunetly the writers atempt to prove the problems with the system just proved it works better than he knows.

      he wrote
      I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained

      however
      Faithful [H] reader Peter Hamilton (who I’m assuming is a Roy Orbison fan) pointed out that the information of Costello and Waits playing together is indeed true. A quick google search netted me the tell tale result. A simple click under Actors on the more link revealed that both aforementioned artists did indeed play this concert together
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (funny article)
      12/18/2005
      Posts:1
    • funny that the writer  s##t him self while trying to discredit wiki.
      unfortunetly the writers atempt to prove the problems with the system just proved it works better than he knows.

      he wrote
      I edited the entry dedicated to musician Tom Waits. In a section on the artist in the 1990s, I wrote that Waits had played a concert with Elvis Costello, Elvis Presley, and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Within 24 hours, the Presley and Mr. Ed references were removed, but the Elvis Costello citation -- also false, but not as glaringly so -- remained

      however
      Faithful [H] reader Peter Hamilton (who I’m assuming is a Roy Orbison fan) pointed out that the information of Costello and Waits playing together is indeed true. A quick google search netted me the tell tale result. A simple click under Actors on the more link revealed that both aforementioned artists did indeed play this concert together
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (funny article)
      12/18/2005
      Posts:1
  • Wrong
    Too bad Tom Waits DID play with Elvis Costello.  You think the author could at least check information he was trying to falsify.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (James)
    12/18/2005
    Posts:1
    • need link
      Re: Wrong by James: Give us a link to a reliable source saying that Waits played with Elvis Costello in the 1990s--and well even credit you! Thanks. -- Editor
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (TR editor)
      12/19/2005
      Posts:1
    • need link
      Re: Wrong by James: Give us a link to a reliable source saying that Waits played with Elvis Costello in the 1990s--and well even credit you! Thanks. -- Editor
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (TR editor)
      12/19/2005
      Posts:1
  • Wikipedia works and at the same time does not work..
    My profs at the University used to say that any reference to Wikipedia in any paper you submit, will be considered a minus and crossed-out and I think they are right about it. It is a good idea to get a first glimpse at a problem by looking at the wiki, but for more information, one should consider standard references and books.

    However, an entire unnoticed problem is bias in the wikipedia. It is not so much about factual errors, but rather the supremacy of political belief systems. While this is not a big deal in the US wiki, it is in Europe. I have seen that socialist content doesnt allow any criticism on their pages, while they censor anything that goes beyond their political scheme. This might be a big problem in the future and is why I abstain from using any social science pages from the Wiki.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Max)
    12/18/2005
    Posts:1
    • Europe
      What you are saying about Europe content is quite wrong. But may be its just that you dont agree with the content.
      When you use censorship to tell the truth, its only the truth of the censor.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sly)
      12/19/2005
      Posts:1
    • Europe
      What you are saying about Europe content is quite wrong. But may be its just that you dont agree with the content.
      When you use censorship to tell the truth, its only the truth of the censor.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sly)
      12/19/2005
      Posts:1
  • Wikipedia  accuracy
    It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Andy)
    12/19/2005
    Posts:1
    • Tom Waits and Elvis Costello
      While I dont doubt that Tom Waits and Elvis Costello played together some time in the 1990s, my false Wikipedia entry said that he played with Tom Waits at the Raven Theater in Healdsburg CA in 1996. I was at that show, and have a recording of it. Elvis Costello did not play.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Eric Hellweg)
      12/20/2005
      Posts:1
    • Tom Waits and Elvis Costello
      While I dont doubt that Tom Waits and Elvis Costello played together some time in the 1990s, my false Wikipedia entry said that he played with Tom Waits at the Raven Theater in Healdsburg CA in 1996. I was at that show, and have a recording of it. Elvis Costello did not play.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Eric Hellweg)
      12/20/2005
      Posts:1
  • Wikipedia  accuracy
    It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Andy)
    12/19/2005
    Posts:1
  • Baou and what Wikipedia has to do
    First, its unfortunate that you legitimize Baous actions and the inflammatory articles on news.baou.com. They dont deserve to be valid voices in any discussion of Wikipedia.

    Second, your conclusion is a bit overblown. Maybe Wikipedia *doesnt* have to adopt new tactics. I would argue the process is working despite recent and occasional problems.

    The information and usefulness of Wikipedia content is improving daily--so whats wrong?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Aaron E. Klemm)
    12/16/2005
    Posts:1
  • The wikipedia war
    An informative article for I, as it shook me out of my nievity, that all that I read on-line, must be factual!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ivor Smith)
    12/16/2005
    Posts:1
  • Wrong
    Too bad Tom Waits DID play with Elvis Costello.  You think the author could at least check information he was trying to falsify.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (James)
    12/18/2005
    Posts:1
  • Wikipedia works and at the same time does not work..
    My profs at the University used to say that any reference to Wikipedia in any paper you submit, will be considered a minus and crossed-out and I think they are right about it. It is a good idea to get a first glimpse at a problem by looking at the wiki, but for more information, one should consider standard references and books.

    However, an entire unnoticed problem is bias in the wikipedia. It is not so much about factual errors, but rather the supremacy of political belief systems. While this is not a big deal in the US wiki, it is in Europe. I have seen that socialist content doesnt allow any criticism on their pages, while they censor anything that goes beyond their political scheme. This might be a big problem in the future and is why I abstain from using any social science pages from the Wiki.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Max)
    12/18/2005
    Posts:1
  • Wikipedia  accuracy
    It seems to me that Wikipedia is only slightly different than any other media source in history (newspapers, TV, etc.).  There is always bias, either cultural or intentional.  The difference discussed here is the transient nature of the information, so if referencing a hard copy should always be made, particularly noting specific date and time of the Wikipedia image.  Does Wikipedia have a CM system so that, if necessary, the history canbe rebuilt?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Andy)
    12/19/2005
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.