Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

Drop-down menus and submenus are a necessary evil of graphical user interfaces. For a site like Amazon, which forces the customer to manipulate an endless number of Matryoshka-doll-like text labels, it’s absolutely crucial to make this hierarchical navigation as easy and fluid as possible. How can you screw up a simple submenu? Oh, trust me, there are ways. If you’ve ever encountered what engineer Ben Kamens calls the “whack-a-mole” menu, you’ll know what I mean. Here’s his example:

GIF by Ben Kamens.

The submenu displays itself instantly when you roll the mouse over its target, but also makes it disappear just as instantly unless you “thread the needle” by moving your mouse exactly horizontally into the submenu area. 

This is super irritating. If Amazon’s menus acted this way, it could cost them millions of dollars in lost sales. 

According to Kamens, the usual solution to “whack a menu” is something called hysteresis. It’s a fancy word that basically just means “delay.” Software engineers makes sure that the submenu doesn’t display (and un-display) instantly; instead, there’s a tiny lag. This gives the user enough time to move her mouse directly (i.e., diagonally) to the submenu item she wishes to click, without the damn thing disappearing out from under her in the process.

The downside is that the submenu itself takes a small bit of time to display in the first place. It’s a very small amount of time, but when navigating in software, anything less than “instant” can feel sluggish. Amazon’s submenus display instantly (no hysteresis up front), but there’s no “whack a menu” problem either. How? 

As Kamens explains, it comes down to something pretty simple: predicting where you’ll move your mouse. Amazon’s engineers predict a certain “zone” of possible mouse paths when you roll over a submenu. If you move into this “zone” (as you would when moving to select an item in the submenu), the hysteresis effect engages, holding the submenu open for you. If you move the mouse outside of this zone, Amazon assumes you’re not interested in the submenu, and it vanishes as instantly as it appeared. 

The result? Well, the result (most likely) is that you never even know how good you have it when using Amazon’s menus. They “just work”; they do what you want and stay out of your way. This is the hallmark of a good software interface: not noticing how good it is. 

But what Kamens’s post (you should really read it) makes fascinatingly clear is just how much engineering and design must fuse together behind the scenes in order to deliver this kind of ultra-subtle, yet ultra-important bit of user experience. At Amazon’s scale, this atomic attention to detail has huge downstream effects on revenue. It’s the perfect example of what Steve Jobs meant when he said “design isn’t how it looks, it’s how it works.” And it’s the kind of human-centric nano-innovation that you never even notice, but have to applaud when you do. 

Read Ben Kamens’s original post here. 

6 comments. Share your thoughts »

Tagged: Web, Mobile, Amazon

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me