Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Today, most websites end with one of only a few suffixes such as “.com” or “.org,” but the list of top-level domain name possibilities is now set to expand. The keeper of the Internet’s naming system will soon arbitrate applications from businesses, organizations and local governments that would like to run their own.  

Google wrote today that it has applied to own domains in several categories, and said it expects to be one of the highest-volume applicants. The blog post gave four examples: three brand and product-related names (“.google,” “.docs,” and “youtube”) and one for its creative possibilities (“.lol”). 

Since about half of all websites are today are “.coms,” the new options have plenty of potential, especially in the hands of Google. One might more intuitively locate the latest video by everyone’s favorite teenage heartthrob by going to JustinBieber.youtube, or see shared documents on a topic of interest by typing in “technology.docs.” Google could sell websites in the “.lol” domain to those wanting to own the meme of the moment or signify irony, similar to many hashtags on Twitter. 

No one is sure whether new domains will really catch on. Advocates of the controversial proposal say brand-specific domains could make Internet fraud more difficult. But the whole scheme could just become a money sink for companies needing to defensively protect their brand. When ICANN, the governing body controlling domain naming rights, issued the “.xxx” domain  last year, the University of Kansas felt it had to purchase “KUgirls.xxx” to fend off a public relations disasters.  Google writes it would work with brand owners to develop “sensible rights protection mechanisms” if its applications are approved. 

2 comments. Share your thoughts »

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me