Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Yesterday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the creation of a nanotechnology initiative in collaboration with the eight Texas academic institutions that make up the Houston-based Alliance for NanoHealth. (These include Rice University, the University of Texas, and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.)

So far, not many details have been released. The FDA’s announcement describes the initiative’s goal as “to help speed development of safe and effective medical products.” The statement also emphasizes the need to “expand knowledge of how nanoparticles behave … and to facilitate the development of tests and processes that might mitigate the risks associated with nanoengineered products.”

This is good news for environmental and consumer groups concerned that research on the potential toxicity of nanomaterials hasn’t been keeping pace with research on their applications.

There are certainly large gaps in our knowledge about these materials, and filling them in will be no small task. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken the stance that nanostructured materials shouldn’t be regulated differently from conventional materials with the same chemical structure. But of course size matters in nanotech–that’s the reason people are excited about its applications to begin with, and assuming that toxicity isn’t affected by these materials’ size and shape doesn’t make sense. The diversity in size, shape, and composition of nanomaterials makes it impossible to make blanket statements about their safety. Hopefully, the FDA program will help make sense of these complex questions.

Information gathered under the FDA program, according to the statement, will be in the public domain. Let’s hope this promise is one with more teeth in it than the EPA’s. Much of the information submitted to that agency’s voluntary nanomaterials program has been classed as “confidential business information” and is not available to the public.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Tagged: Materials, nanomaterials, nanomedicine, FDA, EPA, nanotoxicity, regulation

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me