Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Last night’s election was one of the most hotly contested midterm elections in recent memory. Millions raced to the polls, casting votes that eventually overthrew the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives and left its hold on the Senate in jeopardy.

Despite the feel-good voting hangover many Americans have this morning, not everyone is convinced that our current system–now made up largely of electronic voting machines–serves our republic well.

The main culprit: distrust in electronic voting machines.

There were numerous reports from polling stations around the country concerning glitches with the e-voting machines. While most of the reports indicated that the glitches happened during the first hours the polls were open, the cascade effect was that lines got longer throughout the day.

Some attributed this to the newly installed machines, since nearly one-third of all e-voting systems were installed for this election.

That the new machines hiccupped, though, provides just enough ammunition for people who believe these “technological abacuses” are unreliable. Just north of my home in Kentucky, this was evident. Throughout the day, the news in Ohio–the state at the heart of the controversial 2004 presidential election–focused on the potential for voter fraud.

And maybe that wasn’t such a bad idea. After all, election officials reported hundreds of calls about problems with e-voting machines. From Forbes:

By early afternoon the hotline had received over 500 calls reporting problems in Ohio alone, according to coordinating lawyer Jennifer Scullion.

As more glitches popped up around the country, nervous editorial boards began calling for yet another overhaul of the vote-counting system, claiming that doubt sowed by e-voting machines undermines our democracy. From the Houston Chronicle:

The right to a free and fair vote is the essence of a functioning democracy. The confusion evident Tuesday calls out for continued improvement. Every electronic machine should produce a backup paper trail. Provisional paper ballots should be on hand in case the entire system goes down. Alternatives such as Oregon’s system of mail-in ballots also should be considered.

Other news sources, such as Wired News, are calling for a more rational “debugging” approach to the election. Find the problems, address them, and build a better voting machine.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Tagged: election

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me