Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

You heard it here first – in fact, you heard it here in November. Salon has finally gotten around to writing about Velvet-Strike, the effort by artist Anne-Marie Schleiner, to protest militarism within the online game world of Counter-Strike. Salon is so often way out in front of the rest of us in covering online topics, that I can’t help but gloat that we got there first for once.

Informed Technology Review readers will remember that this movement took advantage of a built-in feature of the game to allow players to spraypaint anti-war icons and language or images evoking childhood innocence within the game world. This action got players pretty upset since they argued they used the game to get away from the craziness of the real world and they didn’t like to see the game (which, after all, deals with things like counterterrorism) politicized. Here’s what the artist had to say about these concerns in the Salon interview:

Anger is an important tool. First, people get angry. Then they are forced to take a position and defend why they are angry. Then, if there is dialogue, they may change their minds. This happened to me with at least one of the flamers I wrote back to. The fluffy, teddy bear-type sprays bring to mind connotations of women and children, components that are excluded from the harsh, bare military world of these types of games. And humor has a subversive effect.

I enjoy playing violent games and I enjoy watching action movies. But I don’t want to play violent games where I am an American killing Arabs in a contemporary Middle East setting. Then there is no difference between entertainment and propaganda. The U.S. government is well aware of the propagandistic potential of games, which is why they have developed free military games like “America’s Army” and “Full Spectrum Warrior.”
This is another example of the ways that games are being used as a form of political speech.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me