Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

On Wednesday European officials confirmed the inevitable: Beagle 2, the British-built lander that was scheduled to land on Mars on Christmas Day, has been declared lost. The British government and the European Space Agency have launched a joint investigation into the failure of the mission, looking at both the technical reasons why the lander never established communications with Earth as well as broader programmatic reasons. The latter may turn out to be more interesting: Beagle 2 was done on a shoestring budget that initially relied on private funding (later supplemented in large part by government money). Several years ago NASA ran into problems when it tried to do too much for too little money with its Mars exploration program, resulting in the failures of Mars Climate Orbiter and Mars Polar Lander/Deep Space 2 missions in 1999. Of course, spending money is no inoculation against failure: Mars Observer cost NASA nearly $1 billion a decade ago, yet failed just days before arriving at the planet.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me