Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Saul Hansell in The New York Times has written an article about the a new (?) phase in the spam-wars: instead of trying to identify spam, spam-fighters are developing techniques for trying to isolate the good mail instead. This is something that is called a Mandatory White List, and it’s been around for several years. (Five? Ten?) The problem with this approach is that it requires that all of your email senders to participate, or else you don’t get their mail.

The article also obliquely discusses ways that SMTP might have to be changed, including adding digital signatures. And it rightfully points out that any sender-based approach to solving spam is going to be victim to those spam-viruses that take over a person’s computer and sends email out using that person’s identity.

Frankly, I don’t have a spam problem: I use SpamAssassin. It catches 150+ spam messages for my account a day, and I just see one or two of them.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me