Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Reducing Roadkill

Researchers in Montana have developed a radio sensor system to combat highway accidents involving wildlife.

By Brittany Sauser

Thursday, October 05, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Deer, moose, and elk don't usually follow the rules of the road. Wandering across a highway, they risk their own lives--as well as those of drivers. With the number of vehicular collisions caused by large wildlife on the rise in the United States, some states are looking to the latest sensor technology to solve the problem.

A Roadside Animal Detection System has been installed along a highway in Yellowstone National Park. The sensor is attached to the bottom of the pole, which also has flashing warning signals on it. (The solar panel is a power source.) (Courtesy of Marcel Huijser, WTI-Montana State University)

Researchers at the Western Transportation Institute at Montana State University (MSU) have been testing a number of different approaches for sites with a high intensity of wildlife-vehicle collisions, including one developed by Sensor Technologies and Systems (STS) of Scottsdale, AZ.

The STS system, called the Roadside Animal Detection System (RADS), uses radio sensors to detect large animals approaching a roadway. If one gets too near a road, the sensor activates a warning signal, alerting drivers to be cautious and slow down.

"Animal-vehicle collisions are a growing problem, with growing costs," says Marcel Huijser, head researcher on the RADS project at MSU. In fact, according to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, a quarterly scientific journal, such collisions cause tens of thousands of injuries and more than $1 billion in property damage in the United States each year.

The researchers at MSU have been testing RADS on a highway in Yellowstone National Park for the last four years, as part of a joint pilot project with STS to develop a cost-effective system for reliably detecting large animals.

The RADS design is based on the "break-beam" principle. A pair of sensors--a transmitter and a receiver--is attached to poles up to one-quarter of a mile apart. A low-power microwave radio signal (around 35.5 GHz) is sent between them. When an animal blocks the radio "beam," the receiver signal output is diminished, indicating a detection. This event triggers flashing amber warning lights, which alert approaching drivers.

The detection requires a clear line of sight between the transmitter and receiver. Thus, roadways with curves, slopes, or other "blind spots" will need extra sensors and may require more maintenance. Also, signal interference from tall, wet, or moving vegetation and large vehicles such as 18-wheelers and buses can cause failures and false detections, if the radio signal reflects off these objects and breaks the beam.

"If the driver's confidence in warning signals is eroded because of alarms being constantly triggered, the driver won't respond," says head researcher Huijser. "But, even more importantly, you absolutely cannot have any false negatives--something RADS had very few of."

By evaluating changes in beam intensity, the researchers were better able to determine when the system was actually detecting an animal. These "signal signatures" allowed developers to change the computed thresholds for detection in the digital signal processor and create software filters. While this has greatly reduced the number of false positives, the researchers plan to continue studying the effectiveness of the RADS system.

According to STS developer Terry Wilson, RADS is a lower-cost solution compared with other available methods, such as the building of overpasses for wildlife. And, unlike animal fencing, the RADS system doesn't interfere with migratory routes. "The cost of RADS continues to be lowered as technology continues to shrink and the equipment needed becomes more power efficient," says Wilson.

A collision with a deer costs an average $7,890, according to the MSU researchers. This includes vehicle repairs, injuries to humans, the value of an animal, and the cost of disposing of carcasses. An accident involving an elk can run an average $17,000; for moose, the figure rises to $28,000.

Comments

  • Why is this......
    ....MIT tech news?  Isn't this the same stuff that's been signaling my entrance/exit to Radio Shack [et al] for the last 10 or 15 years?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rttedrow
    10/05/2006
    Posts:43
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Already on the market?
    I think this technology has been out for several years. http://sensor-tech.com/sub%20pages/products/RADS/rads.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    te26504164
    10/05/2006
    Posts:3
  • Homeocentric POV
    The idea here is to reduce injury to two-legged critters, not four-legged ones. Let insurance pick up the car and let moose watch out for themselves.

    If you are a biker, and you turn Bambi into venison, your chance of transubstantiating is eighty percent. Should you survive, you may not feel very fortunate.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Phineas
    10/05/2006
    Posts:85
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.