Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Making Electrical Grids More Efficient

Beacon Power offers a new way to keep the juice flowing steadily.

By Peter Fairley

Thursday, August 10, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Electric transmission and distribution has long been a tough nut for technology innovation. But deregulated power markets are helping technology developers bypass notoriously tight-fisted, conservative utilities.

Beacon Power’s flywheels can absorb and release power in less than four seconds, balancing supply and demand on the power grid faster, cleaner, and cheaper than conventional power plants. (Credit: Beacon Power Corp.)

TransÉnergie led the way, using DC power technology to build its own "merchant" power lines that carry power for the highest bidder, rather than simply serving the local utilities (see "TransÉnergie: Playing Two Power Games").

Now energy storage developer Beacon Power Corp. of Wilmington, MA, is proposing a similar end-run around slow-moving utilities. Rather than marketing its flywheel-based energy storage systems to utilities, the company plans to build its own merchant flywheel plants that move power on and off a power line to stabilize the grid.

It is an idea that's attracting attention from the independent system operators (ISOs), the regional organizations charged with operating the nation's power grids. California's and New York's ISOs are already testing Beacon Power's equipment. And Matt Lazarewicz, the company's chief technical officer, says an equally important constituency to impress is Wall Street. According to him, the merchant model is the only model Wall Street will finance. "The returns are higher that way," says Lazarewicz. "As soon as you say a utility's going to buy something or do something, investors roll their eyes and walk away."

Beacon Power's flywheel energy storage systems are designed to provide frequency regulation -- a service for which ISOs paid more than $600 million last year. Grid operators need help with frequency regulation because the frequency of a grid's alternating current is constantly fluctuating as electric devices and generators turn on and off, causing temporary imbalances in power production and demand. Unmet demand puts a strain on a grid's power plants, slowing them down and dragging the grid frequency below its set-point (60 hz in North America, 50 hz in Europe and most of Asia). Excess supply has the opposite effect. And either condition can cause utility lines and power plants to automatically disconnect from the grid, thereby preventing damage to utility and customer equipment, but also increasing the risk of blackouts.

ISOs currently rely on fossil-fuel power plants -- primarily gas turbines -- to smooth out a grid's frequency variations. Utilities bid to provide this service, in doing so, placing a set proportion of their power plants' capacity (some 1-2 percent of a grid's total power generation) under the ISOs' direct control. On signals from ISOs, designated plants ramp up and down to roughly balance supply and demand. It's a costly and polluting process because power plants burn their fuel most efficiently when run steadily and at full capacity. "Doing regulation with fossil-fuel generation is the tail wagging the dog," says Imre Gyuk, who runs the U.S. Department of Energy's energy storage research program.

Comments

  • Why generate and pollute?
    Why not reduce excess consumption to obtain the same end ressult, avoiding 15% loss plus obtaining savings in usage at the same time? Generating at the margin or "wasting" to spinn a flywheel just in case, is at best a temporary solution. "Dynamic Flexible demand response" must be the real way forward!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Espen)
    08/10/2006
    Posts:1
    • Because...
      ... you are probably no better than any of those out there sitting in front of their desktop PCs, laptops, 2 or 3 mobile phones, PDAs, plasma TV sets, wardrobe-sized refrigerators and 1 SUV/family member and keep buying power-hungry gizmos, but are the first to raise their voice when it comes to environmental issues without taking one single second to think about it. Who knows, maybe they are part of the cause... Backup power will always be necessary and at least flywheels are efficient and do not represent environmental hazards. As for your "Dynamic Flexible Demand Response", I think it crossed the minds of many people smarter than you. Now the problem is: how do you want to implement that without a system that responds in due time?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Count Zero)
      08/10/2006
      Posts:1
      • Response system
        We have the system, the patents and already we have signed up a lot of people smarter than me (technically). What is your virtue and knowhow regarding the functioning of a balanced electricity grid?
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Espen)
        08/16/2006
        Posts:1
    • zero sum game
      No matter how much 'WE' conserve, there will always be room to conserve more.  Until we all consume zero energy, and that is not going to happen.  So your post is nonsense.
      I was told about the airforce using this type of system for computer UPS decades ago.  They liked it, because nobody could read the power usage and tell what the computers were doing.  According to my friend, they did a great job of power conditioning and stopped lighting strikes from getting into the system. No direct wire.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sir Lanse)
      08/10/2006
      Posts:1
    • It's not about consumption, but frequency
      The whole point is to regulate frequency variations due to unavoidable, unpredictable variations in usage. Cutting overall consumption is a good idea, but unless you can predict, to the second, when a surge in demand will take place, you can't cut consumption to match.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (guest)
      08/10/2006
      Posts:1
      • frequency regulation 2 sec response
        Our patented system, being tested live at the moment in one grid area, responds in under 2 seconds and reach 99,8% of the units to cut as oposed to feed in more power to avoid frequency fluctuations. In addition most of the marginal production polutes and cost more than average. By reducing power consumption, reinforcing the grid can be postponed and transformerstations can be better utilized.
        A flywheel "wastes" by using more than it delivers (and the energy going into production of a large enough number of units to make an impact is also counterproductive.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Espen)
        08/16/2006
        Posts:1
        • Re: frequency regulation 2 sec response
          Yeah good one. And how does reducing consumption help with frequency overruns? Unless you can magically reinject that demand in under 2 seconds when the frequency goes too HIGH, you are just blowing hot air.  A flywheel and capacitor arrangement can address high and low frequency situations in the one unit, with minimal energy wastage.
          I suspect you know virtually nothing about large-scale power systems.  Do you even know what reactive power is?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          Notnerb
          09/27/2006
          Posts:1
  • Flywheel "smoothing" is good, and so are
    all conservation and efficiency measures.  Technology is improving across the board, and removing subsidies helps us implement them.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mark Shapiro)
    08/10/2006
    Posts:1
  • Just a big Capacitor
    It is about time they created this.  In an electronic circuit, you have capacitors and coils to smoothout the voltage and amperage.  But in the electrical distribution system, they don't have it.  I guess it would take a giant capicator to do the job and there is no such thing as a giant capacitor.  So this flywheel storage device should help alot to smoothout the circuit call the distribution line.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Capacitor)
    08/10/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Just a big Capacitor-Not Really
      The flywheel represent a rotating mass that provides both real power and reactive power that within limits of the equipment rating can provide support to the grid during a transient condition
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rpf
      08/25/2006
      Posts:1
  • Residential Unit
    Do they make a residentila sized unit? If yes - where is it available and how much does it cost?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mike)
    08/15/2006
    Posts:1
  • Why frequency varies
    ON a power grid with many generators, often at different locations, the AC generators must be kept in sync.  Heavy transient loads will slow down the nearest generator as it works harder to supply the demand.  If it slows to 59Hz while others are still at 60Hz then the line voltage is no longer a sine wave.  Generators can't change speed very fast because they are big and heavy so an oscillation can start where each one is playing catch up to the others.  Local flywheels could supply this transient energy before it slows the generator and everything stays stable. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ron)
    08/15/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.