Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

WiMAX Cell Phones Edge Closer to Reality

Power-saving chips are paving the way for super-broadband handheld devices.

By Kate Greene

Monday, June 26, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

WiMAX, the souped-up successor to the WiFi wireless standard, could greatly increase the amount of information that cell phones and other mobile devices can pull from the air. Until recently, however, the elaborate antenna technology needed for sending and receiving WiMAX signals has been a big drain on a mobile device's batteries.

Now that the telecommunications industry has settled on final specifications for WiMAX, though, including provisions for power efficiency, manufacturers are exploring ways to build the energy-efficient chips needed to make consumer WiMAX devices viable.

WiMAX-enabled handhelds would be able to access greater bandwidth than traditional cellular networks, allowing faster streaming media and Internet downloads. Moreover, WiMAX phones using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) might drop fewer calls and keep working up to 50 kilometers away from base stations, compared with 16 kilometers for cellular networks and WiFi's mere 100 meters.

Some phones already come equipped with a WiFi chip and can access local WiFi hotspots in addition to cellular networks. But WiFi coverage is spotty -- while WiMAX signals beamed from central towers could blanket entire metropolitan areas. In addition, WiMAX signals can carry 70 megabits of data per second -- more than three times the roughly 20 megabits from WiFi, and far outperforming the 300 kilobits on cellular networks.

So far, only a handful of businesses in large U.S. cities are taking advantage of WiMAX technology, using equipment installed before the recent standards were finalized. In December 2005, the Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers (which created the WiFi (802.11) standard) agreed on technical specifications for mobile WiMAX. Now large companies, including Intel, Alcatel, and Qualcomm, are pushing to develop WiMAX-compliant base station and chipset technologies. Also, in the next few months, the WiMAX Forum, a consortium of companies making and deploying WiMAX equipment, will begin testing and approving mobile products, says Jeff Orr, the forum's director of marketing.

Like most chips for cell phones, WiMAX chipsets have two halves: one sends and receives radio signals, the other processes those signals. Sierra Monolithics of Redondo Beach, CA, specializes in making the radio-frequency portion of WiMAX chipset, which sends signals from the phone and receives them from a base station. By early 2007, the company expects to ship communications chipsets that extend the battery life of WiMAX handhelds into the same range as cellular devices, including the traditionally power-hungry dual-band phones used by international travelers.

Unlike cellular chipsets, which can access only a narrow band of the radio spectrum, often making downloads slower, WiMAX chipsets are designed to tune into and process broader swaths of the radio spectrum. Collecting and processing more of the radio spectrum requires more power, though, because more frequencies must be sorted through.

In addition, most WiMAX equipment uses antenna technology called MIMO (Multiple Input, Multiple Output), which uses more than one antenna to simultaneously collect and send more information greater distances, and power-hungry signal processing algorithms are needed to sort through the information collected via MIMO connections.

The power problem is even more formidable for manufacturers who want to build chips for multi-band WiMAX phone for use in different parts of the world. Each region, such as the United States and Asia, is setting aside a different portion of the spectrum for WiMAX, and accessing multiple bands usually requires a separate chip for each band.

Comments

  • WiMAX is not a replacement for WiFi
    Introducing WiMAX as a successor to WiFi is incorrect.  WiMAX is a wireless alternative to Wide Area Networks, such as ADSL.  WiFi is a wireless alternative to Local Area Networks such as Ethernet.  WiMAX isn't intended to connect my laptop in the garden to my desktop in the house.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Chris Miller)
    06/26/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      While I agree with the general point, the article primarily concerns  Wifi and WiMAX as they relate to mobile phones, generally meant to be farther roaming than WiFi allows; in this specific application, WiFi isn't very advantageous, and will likely be superceded in general use by WiMAX. Ni si fallor.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sean)
      06/26/2006
      Posts:1
  • How will it works?
    I mean, I will be able to buy an WiMAX device and install it like a WiFi HUB, so I can use my WiMAX mobile phone and I will be able to talk to anyone using VOIP for free many miles from my house. If I am far from my house, I will be able to use someone's network for free too? That's it??? Is a licence required to operate these devices??? How it will work if anyone can use an wireless device that can send RF signals for 70 Km???
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Richard)
    06/26/2006
    Posts:1
    • Consumers need not apply
      the article makes is clear that WiMAX is about public access to the internet: it is intended for cellphone access, and for computer access. Public WIFI hotspots (airports, muncipal, etc) might be replaced by these, but not your home network. Unless you want to apply to the radio spectrum licensing ageny in your country. (FCC in US, right?).What you are more likely to do is by a Wimax modem for your computer, or a WiMAX capable PDA or Cellphone.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Brian)
      06/26/2006
      Posts:1
  • The end of mobile phone?
    So if you have free internet on your mobile, who will pay for air time in urban areas if you can use voip for free? For sure, the cheapest plan will fit for 90% of the users. A pre-paid plan will be enough to keep the phone number and use it when no network is available. It can happen in 5 years ...
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Richard)
    06/26/2006
    Posts:1
    • Not likely.
      I don't see the big phone companies giving up their revenue so easily. They'll make up the cost with the charges for WiMaAX access and VOiP (Call me a pessimist, but I'd look for free VOiP providers to get acquired/regulated away.)
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sean)
      06/27/2006
      Posts:1
  • WiMax-believe it when I see it
    claims of 50 kilometres and 70 megabits are misleading--all wireless proponents vastly exaggerate the true real-world performance of their gear. Let's wait & see what the production gear does.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Guido)
    06/26/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: WiMax-believe it when I see it
      Sprint is begining a buildout for a WiMax network that is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2008.  Mobile range is estimated to be 4 miles and the fixed range is estimated at 8 miles.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rasp57
      01/29/2007
      Posts:1
  • Stop Propagating bullshit
    It is very sad to see same hype getting mindlessly written by correspondents. the 50Km coverage is theoretical maximum for a base station operating at maximum and the Maximum throughput of 70 mbps is shared between users in a cell.Actual speeds will be around 1-2 mbps (max) and coverage of 1-3 Km. This will be quite comparable to 3G networks after the HSDPA and HSUPA upgrades. The basic problem with the handsets is that they will be operating at much higher frequencies as compared to WCDMA (3G), Hence they will need to use much higher amounts of power to operate at those frequencies. I would love to see some concrete proof of good battery life of a WiMAX handset, rather than the correspondent putting some obscure comments together to write a piece and giving it a sensational title.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Dinesh)
    07/03/2006
    Posts:1
    • It will work
      Yes, there's a lot to do about bandwith and throughput, but that's not the important thing here. Anyone can remember the size of the analog cell phones 10 years ago, WiMAX will eventually work and will eventually be a solution. What is important about this now, is that we are opening for competition, the mobile service providers will have to be able to deal with this competition, this means lower prices and value agregated services. And yes, of course the speed of a WiMAX access will be the same as GPRS or other 3G protocol, and I think that's a very good start!!!
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Alfredo Ulloa)
      07/11/2006
      Posts:1
  • WiMax ... Local Loop
    WiMax (or ... plus) used as freqHop RF local loop to home and businesses may prove a replacement for telco/cable communications and entertainment services. Local/Home electricity eliminates power issues for the customers at home and on the job. Eventually the personal phone power problem and global signaling issues will be resolved by TEK.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JDBailey
    12/29/2006
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: WiMax ... Local Loop
      WiMAX is not Frequency Hopping - Its OFDM/SOFDMA. Big difference.

      I think most of the nay-sayers are unaware of the stark differences between FHSS systems like CDMA and OFDM systems like WiMAX. OFDM handles error correction and multipath at the air-interface by encoding parity into RF subcarriers. This is what really enables the technology to work, not just the beam-forming antenna technology.

      To be honest, comparing non-OFDM 3G technologies to WiMAX's air interface (specifically 802.16e) is just unfair to 3G.

      Although Qualcom purchased Flarion and it's Intellectual Property there's no OFDM-like 3G technology commercially in use toay. Flarion had a compelling proprietary OFDMA implementation and successful field trials (Nextel - Raliegh-Durham NC for instance).

      The other piece of the puzzle thats not even mentioned here is the business case offered by WiMAX. It's a STANDARD. There's going to be a bazillion different devices with the standard integrated thanks largely to Intel and Motorola. Remember what Intel's Centrino did for WiFi? They're doing the same thing with WiMAX. You never going to see wide-implementation of UMTS or EVDO in laptops or other devices bacause every vendor that wants to implement these technologies has to pay a royalty to Qualcomm or some other IP licensing giant. That's not even mentioning the lack of economies of scale a non-standard technology poses.

      Ok - back to whether or not it works: Having worked directly with pre-certified WiMAX (802.16d) equipment and other unlicensed fixed OFDM systems operating in 5.8Ghz, I have been astonished at the capability of such systems even at 1/25th of the power of licensed-spectrum WiMAX.

      Real World Example: My company has fixed-multipoint links operating at distances of four miles (no MIMO involved - just single-diversity sector panels and directional antennas) over hilly terain, through coniferous and deciduous trees, maintaing actual throughput of 15-20 MBps (We use Alvarion BreezeACCESS VL, if you're curious).

      Don't buy believe what you read, fine. But I think everyone will be singing a different tune in about 24 months.

      JDW
      Rate this comment: 12345

      soundtivity
      01/22/2007
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • practical call quality effects?
    How would all of this effect call quality?
    1) signal strength?
    2) sound quality (error rate?)
    3) standby/call capability (hours)?

    And, on a broader issue -- does 3g enabled phone
    has any advantage (strictly for voice calls!)
    over, say, EDGE only phone?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    realpro
    10/07/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.