Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Lights, Camera -- Jamming

A prototype device seeks out cameras and blocks them from taking pictures and video.

By Kate Greene

Thursday, June 22, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

As the bootlegging of first-run movies increases, with the availability of inexpensive digital cameras, there should be a way to thwart them, says Gregory Abowd, associate professor in the College of Computing at Georgia Tech. To do this, he and his team have developed a device that can detect the presence of a digital camera or camcorder -- and keep it from capturing usable images.

Two researchers at Georgia Tech with a prototype device that can detect digital cameras and camcorders and prevent them from taking useful images. (Courtesy of Gary Meek.)

Researchers have been trying to develop effective ways to jam a camera for years, says Edward Delp, professor of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue University. A number of companies, including Philips, Thomson, and Apogen Technologies, as well as a handful of universities, have been working on projects and prototypes. The Georgia Tech approach, which combines methods of detecting a camera and the means to automatically prevent it from taking pictures is "a nice technology," says Delp, that achieves these two goals in one device, while also using infrared light to spot cameras, in contrast to some other combination systems.

To locate a camera, the researchers exploited a component of many digital cameras and camcorders: the charge-coupled device (CCD) that converts light collected by a camera's lens into an image stored in its memory. Because of its shape, a CCD is retro-reflective, meaning it reflects incoming light back out at the same angle. Taking advantage of this, the Georgia Tech device shines infrared LED light, which is invisible to the human eye, at a distance of about 20 feet, then collects video of these reflections with a camcorder, Abowd explains. Then the video of the reflections is transferred to a computer, where it's sent through image-processing algorithms that pick out infrared light bouncing back. And to decrease the chances of false positives -- infrared light reflecting off other objects, such as eyeglasses and earrings -- the researchers added image-processing algorithms that account for the specific shape of the CCD reflections and those of other objects.

In the second step, to block the camera from taking pictures, the device uses a projector that emits a narrow beam of white light directly at a CCD. The beam saturates the CCD with varying intensities of light, Abowd says, forcing the camera's electronics to constantly adjust, and ultimately producing large white splotches that cover about one-third of the recorded scene. The result: a low-quality, if not worthless, recording or photograph.

Comments

  • Counter-counter measures?
    As with any technology, it will be only a matter of time before serious bootleggers adopt counter-measures to thwart the detect and destroy system.  It would seem to be only a matter of optics and electronics, a challenge to anyone with a modicum of knowledge of electronic technologies.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Michael Braundar)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
    • Optics Alone can
      With the advent of newer optic coatings that can filter out such white light and a few innovative means to adjust these optics to work with DVC's is not a problem. But my guess is why someone would want to buy a DVC copy of a movie taken in a dark theater is beyond me. Besides anyone knows the best way to stop theives as well as those annoying cell phones is to find a means to disable all electronic devices within the small area of the theater without damaging them in any way. Just the idea of device detection is good, at least that way they can be confiscated before they enter the room. All electronic devices emit a small EM field, why this can not be detected I do not know?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Mr.B)
      06/22/2006
      Posts:1
    • simple
      actually it wouldn't seem to take much of anything to overcome this...... how about a number of cameras filming?   how about dummy cameras that emit just the kind of infrared spectrum they are looking for, while the real camera in action doesn't....  but of course the real implications are... is the military or are the police working on this so there won't be "inconvenient" evidence of massacres, beatings etc.?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (david)
      06/22/2006
      Posts:1
      • easy
        How about an infrared filter over the lens so there's no infrared signature? 

        This sort of technology bugs the hell out of me.  Next, it'll be legally possible for someone to shutter your eyes and stopper your ears!
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Chris Rose)
        06/22/2006
        Posts:1
      • They already do that
        You don't have to filter any IR or EMF's to expunge unflattering news.  You just filter the information.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Jonathan)
        06/22/2006
        Posts:1
  • Bad News For Paparazzi??
    Is this sounds bad news for those paparazzi? Since they cannot capture those pirate photo or video anymore. But as what Micheal suggested above, is just a matter of time for those people to figure out how to counter bac this type of device.

    Seem there is everyone desire to intrude other people piracy. Then what shall we lay on for this problem? Education???
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (oyao)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • Good news for the bad guys
    Great invention for nak robbers and other who want to thwart legitimate survallience cameras and perhaps a market to thwart the thwarters.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (tj)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • But will it stop traffic cams?
    Just kidding, oppressive local Big Brother law enforcement agaencies!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (sentinelwolf)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • Nefarious applications will trump its good
    Team of theives use it to enter areas that use cameras. they rely on the fact that when someone uses a camera, they are overconfident and dont spend on things that would work without a camera.

    just the flashing white lite (or vibrating laser pointer), is enough and easy enough to set up to point into a camera lens from far away. once set up, no one would notice it, and the cameras are effectively disarmed.

    think of all the art museums and such that use external cameras (which were always vulnerable to being knocked out any way. however this is very unobtrusive).

    i will bet that even without the actual device being made, that there is some person out there willing to walk away with something now that they know how they can dissarm a camera from outside its view zone.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Artfldgr)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Nefarious applications will trump its good
      HELP, I have been years trying to get someone to listen to me that my cameras get shut down. I am a single 62 yr old woman that has spend a lot of money to protect my home and STILL Can't. In 1994, a man and his wife move next to me. He was in the Military as a high officer in Securities. His job was to disarm or distroy cameras. My house started getting broken into all the time. all christmas, tools, blankets , dishes  all my nice things gone and my house was still locked up. I kept changing my locks and put deadbolts in and still could not keep them out. I also in 2001 , I put 12 cameras in on three DVR's to tape them. First all my Tapes would be gone and still no proof. Then my cameras started been burned up. I sent a couple back to company and they say they was burned up.  I even quit my job to stay home and watch my home, but that did not do any good. I even changed locks again. This time got a lock that no locksmith can change. Now they keep trying to break into my new door. In June 2009, I again put up 3 cameras. all that I could afford. Iam on a small pension. Now when I leave, my cameras are shut down. example. Sun, when I go to church, they are shut down from 9am to 12 noon. Wed. Bible study , I leave about 6 Pm and home about 8:30 PM. I came home again this Wed and put in the time of 5pm to 8:30 and My cameras was down from 6:20pm to 8:15 PM. AS ALWAY down when I leave my home. My yard and everything is being torn up and still no proof. Do you have any answers for me. When I read your article, then I new someone would believe me.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Rainbow1946
      07/16/2009
      Posts:3
  • A simplier appraoch
    There is a simplier anti-camcorder technology.  Visit www.peervision.com.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (VSo)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • Film?
    How about using a film camera?  Maybe those old James Bond Minox-C cameras will make a comeback.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Fran Taylor)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • Humans
    How about just detecting the camera and then alerting the usher or manager that someone is filming?  No need for a technological solution to the actual filming part...
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Phil)
    06/22/2006
    Posts:1
  • Been done before
    It is always good when the predictions of science fiction are turned into reality - the Thunderbirds television series presented this capability over forty years ago !
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Allan Gillard)
    06/23/2006
    Posts:1
  • Why Oh Why?
    it's indicative of the increasing negativity in todays society, that Gregory Abowd. thinks this is a good way to further push the frontiers of technology. I see ity differently, i see it as a wasteful use of resources, only there to aid those who have something to hide, and have the bucks to hide it. WHY, OH WHY, CAN'T PEOPLE LIKE ABOWD DO SOMETHING BENEFICIAL TO SOCIETY? like make those digital cameras BETTER.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (peter ashworth)
    06/23/2006
    Posts:1
    • human nature
      Exactly. Especially considering that consumers are funding this kind of research. I guess the costs are in the ticket / cameras prices already. I guess some people will do anything for a buck or misunderstood "achievements".
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Al)
      06/26/2006
      Posts:1
  • Very easy to beat this system
    The technology already exists to beat this jamming system. Go to a professional photo shop, and buy yourself an IR filter and a photographic hood for your camera's objective. That's all you need. Let those retarded geeks at Georgia Tech think they accomplished something:)))
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (xyz)
    06/23/2006
    Posts:1
  • Good news for criminals or terrorists
    If this Technology reaches the market, anyone with criminal intentions will be able to block or to take out cctv-cameras or any digital device guarding our recording our vauluables i.e. homes or premises, not to speak the implementation on the battlefield to counter high-tech armies equipped with digital tracking and observation devices.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Gunnar Eriksson)
    06/29/2006
    Posts:1
    • u can already do that too
      If you want to take out security cameras, you just have to shine a laser beam onto them. You  can buy a laser pointer for $5 - but a "professional' would go for a more powerful laser - these are also widely avaliable to the public. The question is whether the security people will notice the camera blinding in time.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (xyz)
      06/29/2006
      Posts:1
      • Re: u can already do that too
        Please explain, I have cameras that keep getting shut down when I leave my driveway. When I am home they are working, when I leave , they are not.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Rainbow1946
        07/16/2009
        Posts:3
  • we-are-jamming-you
    earthlings-why-do-you-think-you-have-no-pictures-of-us -- that-is-because-we-always-make-sure-we-jam-you-(just-before-we-jam-it-to-you)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    alien
    03/06/2007
    Posts:1
  • [no subject]
    Please explain how you can shut down the cameras.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Rainbow1946
    07/16/2009
    Posts:3

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Microsoft's Many Multitouch Mice
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.