To customize the generator for children with varying strengths, or so that users can decide how hard they want to work, the design includes a computer chip that continuously adapts to how much resistance users feel. This electronic "variable motor loading" is like changing gears on a bicycle to go up a hill, Bulthaup says. "Each person pedals at the same speed, but a stronger person can push harder with each stroke. Our device automatically adjusts the loading to reach that optimum comfort/power point."
The device meets other key criteria, too, including durability and ease of use. If the string breaks, for instance, it can be easily replaced with a shoe string, or a similar object. And the generators should cost less than $10 apiece, Bulthaup says.
In an e-mail, Nicholas Negroponte, chairman of the One Laptop per Child project, says the device is the best-performing of the many they've looked at so far, and that they intend to use the design with their laptops -- if it continues to perform well in tests and another, better design does not appear. Other human-power options may also be used, however, depending on the situation, says Mark Foster, the project's vice president of engineering and chief architect.
The $100 laptop developers are also working with several firms on an ambitious, related project: developing a long-lasting battery system to be paired with the generator (or to charge off AC power). This battery system will include "custom chemistry, unique electronics, and complex charge and discharge monitoring algorithms to deliver 2,000 battery cycles -- four times more than normal PCs," Foster says. A long charging session in the morning, for instance, would allow kids to use the laptop throughout the day, with the batteries storing enough energy for eight hours of work -- with enough left over for the computer to serve as a wireless mesh network router for another 16 hours.
The $100 laptop, which the developers expect to start shipping to interested countries next year, will actually cost $135 to manufacture at first, before it drops to a projected $100 by 2008.
The project is making steady progress, moving forward on its integrated circuit, software, and industrial designs, Foster says. Once everything is ready, the group plans to conduct extensive testing: they've set aside 500 laptops to be tested until they're destroyed -- to make sure they're rugged enough for rough environments.
Comments
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
I still think that a decent laptop could use some of the "tricks" of this one; lower power and free open-source software, for example. Thing is, it's likely such a thing would in fact creat enough demand to make it worth selling at a low profit margin.
Ni si fallor.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
I'm sure any of these computers that actually get deployed will end up being used by militias to better coordinate communications.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
anyway, i think these would be more likely to enable kids who would otherwise be kidnapped into a militia (common in many conflicts) to organize and share information on how to evade the kidnappers.
07/25/2006
Posts:1
They're all using mobiles, radios, etc anyway.
will_e_web
10/13/2006
Posts:5
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
Or you could buy a used Blackberry. It is close to the same size and has more uses.
07/25/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
But are laptops really the most pressing need? How about clean water? With all respect, nobody sane will spend a dime on a computer if it means they'll drink polluted water.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
They can survive drinking polluted water, but if they don't get educated they will never learn how to take the polluted water and make it drinkable.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
If I can buy one of these for $280 for my nephew in order to give someone else one for free I might.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
I also think that there are plenty of people a little way above the level of absolute subsistence who could use these. Many of those are in the same countries, or even the same towns, as those who need clean water. Go to India if you want to see the contrast. So the govt should buy pumps and latrines for some, and laptops for others. If they only buy pumps they'll be stuck at subsistence.
will_e_web
10/13/2006
Posts:5
07/24/2006
Posts:1
Imagine the possible effects of a whole generation of educated citizens. It really could make a quantum leap in politics, activism and organizing.
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
will_e_web
10/13/2006
Posts:5
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
so that's bad for something that will be used in a classroom setting
also hand operated cranks are very wasteful and you tire quickly (couple minutes)
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
and their 44 million caregivers
Telemed is a good applicatin
07/24/2006
Posts:1
and again!
(so yes, it is to be seen if these computers will help establish world peace.)
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/25/2006
Posts:1
07/25/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
will_e_web
10/13/2006
Posts:5
07/27/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
Who needs a mobile? These kids will create a bigger VOIP network than googleChat and Skype together!
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
07/27/2006
Posts:1
Get it straight.. scarcity is deliberate at this point because narrow thinking people have been sold this concept of individual responsibility by cutthroat hooligans who run the global economy on sweat and blood of the poor.
Look out. Their time is coming.
07/28/2006
Posts:1
Just use a cell phone receiver, then phone it.
Or a radar trap detector and a radar gun to trigger it.
Or a mechanical clock - much more reliable over longer periods (you did notice that the laptop runs out of power pretty quick, didn't you).
All of the above are a lot smaller too.
will_e_web
10/13/2006
Posts:5
07/27/2006
Posts:1
07/25/2006
Posts:1
07/25/2006
Posts:1
Places with unreliable, expensive power?
How about Queens, NYC? Or SoCal?
07/25/2006
Posts:1
07/26/2006
Posts:1
08/08/2006
Posts:1