Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wireless Wonder Chip

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Thursday, July 20, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The most technically challenging aspect of the Memory Spot project, explains Taub, was to integrate all of the components -- an antenna, a modem, memory, and a processor -- onto a chip less than a millimeter wide. All the components are placed in a specific configuration to keep the antenna from interfering with circuitry in the rest of the device.

Part of the reason this high capacity is possible, explains Taub, is the wireless frequency used to transmit data to and from a tag via the Memory Spot reader. The chip's antenna and reader operate at the 2.45 gigahertz frequency band, which is used in Wi-Fi, while most RFID tags use 13.56 megahertz. By operating in Wi-Fi range, significantly more bandwidth is available to send data from chip to reader, resulting in transmission rates of 10 megabits per second, much faster than traditional RFID. Data transfer speed is a crucial feature because "people wouldn't want to wait around for a couple of seconds while the reader is reading the chip," he says.

Additionally, how data is transmitted is an important consideration, says John Waters, a researcher at HP Labs in Bristol, U.K. who worked on the project. "We have specifically designed a scheme that...requires a minimum amount of circuitry in the chip to function," he says.

The HP announcement is another step in the evolution of wireless, ubiquitous computing, says Lionel Lavallee, senior RFID solution architect at Intel. Looking back at the types of RFID available a few years ago, the devices were fairly distinct, he says, and could be broken into a few categories: passive RFIDs that use power from the reader and hold only a small amount of data; active RFIDs that have more computing power and memory, but also use batteries that have a limited lifetime; and battery-powered sensors that collect information from the environment. "Now you're seeing a continuum of all the technologies bleeding together," he says. "You get this cross pollination that grabs the best bits of both worlds."

Lavallee predicts that RFID will finally start to become widely adopted in businesses in the next 12 months. "Right now we're at a tipping point," he says. Standard RFID technology will start to become commonplace, showing up in hospitals to track patients and treatments, in pharmaceuticals to prevent counterfeiting, and increasingly on products to replace bar codes.

And Memory Spot could add another set of applications to wireless chips because of its much greater memory capacity and battery-free longevity. Still, HP's chip will not completely replace traditional RFID, suggests Taub, since it's more expensive than conventional RFID tags, which can cost less than 10 cents each. Additionally, not all applications -- for example, authenticating a shipment of flip-flops for Wal-Mart -- would need so much memory.

Nonetheless, the chip's relatively large storage capacity makes it an ideal candidate for some wireless technology and applications. While it was conceived as a way to add audio to photographs, says Taub, he can envision attaching the chip to a postcard, to send pictures of vacations to family and friends, or being used in textbooks to create media-rich environments.

At this early stage, however, it's not clear what applications Memory Spot will be best suited for, if it does make it out of the lab. "It's hard to predict a killer app until it's released in the marketplace," says Rajit Gadh, professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at UCLA and a specialist in RFID technology. But he's encouraged by the capabilities of the HP chip and expects that one of its most exciting applications will be for storing and sharing digital media. "I think this is a very positive development for the field of RFID," he says, "with the possibility of creating new markets, such as media streaming content over passive RFID."

Comments

  • chip
    not really that handy, i mean sure it has some uses but its the size of memory is too small for me.  Even if they had to make it bigger, i wouldnt mind.  Its the size that really counts.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (lucifer)
    07/20/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      i agree we would need more size, or networking multiple chip together in order to obtain greater size.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (gpfistner)
      07/20/2006
      Posts:1
    • 4meg RFID
      I think it has a great many potential new uses.  If worm it will limit use to product marking and other info when poled applications.  If the memory can be easily updated with very low power that opens many more novel applications
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bob Zeliff)
      07/20/2006
      Posts:1
      • Forget traditional RFID applications
        This isn't a "super RFID" so much as a new idea. How 'bout an electronic wireless passport that keeps all your travel history--you just walk thru customs, your passport is read AND updated, and you keep going. Or it could be used for tracking shipping containers--once received a history of the container's (and more importantly its contents) could be printed out. No, there are a ton of uses.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Jim Van Sickle)
        07/20/2006
        Posts:1
  • Why the size Issue?
    The point of this chip isn't to be the world's next flash drive.  Four megabits is plenty to hold some bacis instructions about a document, or the history of something, or the authenticity of medication.  The goal for this isn't personal use, like being attached to a PC to hold Word documents and music...
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (The Guru)
    07/20/2006
    Posts:1
  • Any relation to MRAM announced by Freescale
    Is there any relation with Freescale's  MRAM technology, which also targets similar market.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Shan)
    07/20/2006
    Posts:1
  • RFID future
    This device seems to be one of many RFID chips that could interact with any object of our life. The evolution could be the "interaction" among varius RFIDs, the same way of some cooperative robots. Insn'it?
    Marco
    http://www.marcodesalvo.it
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (MARCO DE SALVO)
    07/21/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.