Better than HybridsA proposed engine design approaches the efficiency of gas-electric hybrids, but could be far cheaper.
Consumers hoping to cut gasoline spending, with average gas prices nearing $3 a gallon, could opt for hybrids. But even with gas prices high, the added cost of hybrid cars can cancel money saved at the pump, suggesting the need for lower-cost alternatives. A new type of ethanol-boosted, turbocharged gasoline engine could be the answer. The engine would be almost as efficient as gas-electric hybrids, but cost much less, according to its MIT inventors -- Leslie Bromberg and Daniel Cohn, plasma science and fusion center researchers, and John Heywood, professor of mechanical engineering. The new engine would improve efficiency in two ways. The first is to decrease the size of the engine, which reduces friction, thus saving fuel at light engine loads, such as during city driving. When more power is needed, a turbocharger kicks in. It uses exhaust flow to compress air, making it possible to combust more air and fuel in a smaller space. The second approach is to engineer the engine to have a higher compression ratio -- the ratio of the volume of air and fuel before and after it is compressed in an engine. A higher compression ratio "makes the engine more efficient, because you expand the burned gases more and extract more energy out of them," Heywood says. Neither of these are new ideas. But in the past, such efforts have been limited by a phenomenon called knock: high compression ratios and extreme turbocharging cause gasoline to spontaneously combust when the engine is under heavy loads, such as during acceleration or at high speeds, potentially causing serious damage. The MIT researchers have found a way to prevent knock, allowing them to crank up the turbocharger and increase the compression ratio -- and thereby increase the power of an engine by 250 percent. If this increase in power is taken advantage of to reduce the size of the engine -- which would go against long-time trends emphasizing performance over fuel economy -- it could save gas. "This allows very large pressure turbocharging, very large downsizing of the engine, and makes it possible to have a small engine with much higher efficiency," Cohn says. The researchers solved the knocking problem by injecting into combustion chambers precisely controlled amounts of ethanol at moments when the engine is working hard enough to cause knock. Compared with gasoline, ethanol has higher octane, a rating of how much a fuel can be compressed before it combusts spontaneously, that is, before it causes knocking. The injected ethanol also cools the mixture, so it effectively increases the octane rating of the fuel mix to about 130 -- as good as high-performance racing fuels, Cohn says.
|
Nonelectric Hybrid Engines
04/01/2008









Comments
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/27/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
As Methanol is an alcohol it does not contain octane. Methanol, however, mimicks a high octane value by preventing detonation- much in the same way toluene does. IT has the added benefit of cooling combustion chamber temperatures and thus allowing even higher compression.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
Higher octane fuels do not nessesarily have a higher energy content, but can be compressed to a greater degree that will compensate for it's energy rating.
06/08/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
BWM was developing a system to generate steam from that waste heat and to use a small steam engine to provide copious low end torque. It's a great idea but adds a LOT of complexity.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
Gasoline hydrogen injection:
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/11/hydrogenenhance.html
Diesel hydrogen injection: http://www.hydrogen-boost.com/Diesel.html
04/24/2006
Posts:1
He claims 80 MPG W/standard IC
engine.
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
Problem Solved!
Slobber...slobber...
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
Imagine a car fire involving gasoline- we've all seen how horrifice those can be. But what about hydrogen? The fact is that leaking hydrogen would immediately rise and be blown away from the scene of an accident- unlike gasoline- thus reducing the risk of a fire in the first place.
The issue most people have with Hydrogen is images of the Hindenburg burning. The problem there is the Hinderburg (and R101 for that matter) were both built using highly flammable materials to begin with. On top of that the Hindeburg was painted with the same chemical used a fuel oxidizer by the German rocketry program!
Stored correctly Hydrogen is no more dangerous than Gasoline. Stored incorrectly both Gasoline and Hydrogen as extremely dangerous.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
And yet Hydrogen is dangerous...Hydrogen doesn't flow and stick like gasoline, it doesn't sink and pool like propane. The only common fuel that's safer is diesel, and I can safely say Hydrogen is far better on the breathing than diesel fumes.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/27/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
1) e-85 gasohol attracts moisture so that the so that the octane rating can fluctuate widely from day to day even using the same tank of fuel.
2) e-85 gasohol is hard on most fuel injectors if they are not built to cope with the higher corrosive property. Just try adding 'dry gas' to every tank of gas you use for a year and see what the repair bill is.
3) By injecting the ethanol in separately a much more precise and continuous monitoring of, as well as continuous adjustment for the octane rating can be achieved.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
It still makes sense to make vehicles lighter and more aerodynamic, and to use them first on taxis and buses, where the return on investment is higher.
04/24/2006
Posts:1
Unfortunately the "versus hybrid" meme is propagated widely. GM pushed it in their "ethanol versus hybrid" arguments, because that is their marketing battle. For them it is Yellow Gas Caps versus the Prius.
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
05/03/2006
Posts:1
"Including fuel savings and tax credits, Consumer Reports said, the Toyota Prius hybrid would save about $400 over five years and the Honda Civic hybrid would save about $300 compared with conventionally powered models."
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-briefs8.4mar08,1,4067793.story?coll=la-headlines-business
There are still some questionable assumptions there, about depreciation, and their choice of the smaller Corolla as a Prius "equivalent."
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
They should have done a few passes and let people see the effect of $2, $3, $4 as the 5 year average.
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/26/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
04/24/2006
Posts:1
http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars_trucks/1266891.html
04/24/2006
Posts:1
Another company recent announced a car that would do over 100 MPH and get 157MPG using a 20 HP diesel.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
Like most conspiracy theories it is just full of holes. What, the US is the only place that has this technology, even though it is so simple and obvious? Or is it some "world shadow governement" that is suppressing these technologies? The government doesn't OWN technology, and if this could be done so easily some big enterprise would have jumped all over it by now.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
Straight Methanol injection (into the air intake or throttle body as in current systems) would be expensive (methanol is very expensive in any sort of pure form) and the alcohol would evaporate before it made it into the cylinders.
What these people have proposed is using direct injection of methanol and delaying injection until the methanol can do the most good.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
Hydrogen can be done, but the problem is the long term effects. I could see possibly injecting ethonal into hydrogen(gas form, not frozen liquid form) to help knock. Dont think for a second that hydrogen hasnt been done already. You have to think of the economical impact it would have on the world.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
it is a few linden vs 30 to 40 linden
Just my observation.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/26/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
Propane is much easier to store, is safer and is already available throughout much of the US. Wet jet propane systems can enhance gasoline engines and straight propane powered conversions work well too. It still has less power than gas, but it's viable now.
I think any next gen vehicle that gets great efficiency is going to have to use the new diesels and/or a combination of two or three fuels to take advantage of multiple efficiency 'tricks' in the heat cycle.
04/25/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
04/25/2006
Posts:1
05/25/2006
Posts:1
http://www.angellabsllc.com/mytengine.html
04/26/2006
Posts:1
05/03/2006
Posts:1
04/26/2006
Posts:1
04/27/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
sighting enemy could activate a methonal-water mixture that increased fuel consumed, thus an increase in power and the mixture reduced pre-ignition problems !
06/08/2006
Posts:1
is gone, can we make tires straight out of the reactor? Back to wooden cleats?
How about this -- stay home!
04/27/2006
Posts:1
04/28/2006
Posts:1
05/03/2006
Posts:1
I can't get to this file. Do you have download instructions, or is there a URL?
05/10/2006
Posts:1
05/11/2006
Posts:1
05/16/2006
Posts:1
Are you suggesting that your system is not heavy, bulky, expensive, complex as most hybrid systems are?
05/16/2006
Posts:1
05/17/2006
Posts:1
05/15/2006
Posts:1
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/21/2006
Posts:1
06/09/2006
Posts:1
07/15/2006
Posts:1
Guest(yont)
02/05/2007
Posts:2
In Hawaii a PERSON HAS INVENTED an apparatus that can fit into any reciprocating automoble engine diesel or gas and have it preform over a hundred miles (MPG) per Any Combustible gallon of fuel. And dose not admit toxic fowl exhaust into the atmosphere.
At the moment the person and automoble is under trial. and it is "successful it works". we should hear of this invention sometime this year.2007
first to act we believe will be the EPA.
manallc.com
02/16/2007
Posts:1