Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

When a geothermal power plant started spewing hot water into the barren, volcanic landscape of Iceland’s Southern Peninsula in 1976, the locals turned the steaming lake into a health spa that’s now frequented by half a million people a year. Now a small Icelandic company is hoping to turn a profit from waste carbon dioxide from the same plant.

Carbon Recycling International has built an adjacent plant that converts the carbon dioxide into methanol, a fuel and feedstock for making plywood, paints, and other products. It may be the first company anywhere to demonstrate a commercially viable way of making liquid fuel directly from carbon dioxide, something that could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

So far, though, the economics work only in rare places that have cheap power and cheap carbon dioxide. For carbon dioxide recycling to make a big dent in emissions, we’ll need breakthroughs in catalysis and almost certainly a tax on emissions of carbon dioxide to provide an incentive to capture and use it.

In Iceland, industrial prices for electricity are only four cents per kilowatt-hour, roughly a third of what industry pays in Germany or in New England in the United States.

The carbon dioxide emitted by the geothermal plant is also cheaper to capture than the carbon dioxide from fossil-fuel power plants. At coal-fired plants, carbon dioxide is a product of burning coal in air—the resulting flue gas, like air, is mostly nitrogen, and separating the carbon dioxide is expensive.

Geothermal plants are powered by water heated by hot rocks underground, often those associated with volcanoes. Carbon Recycling brands its methanol Vulcanol, says CEO K-C Tran, because “it’s made with energy from a volcano.” Carbon dioxide is formed by the decomposition of underground carbonate rocks. The amount of carbon dioxide is relatively small—roughly one-20th as much as for coal-fired power plants per kilowatt-hour of electricity. But the geothermal plant emits highly concentrated streams of carbon dioxide that require less energy and equipment to separate and capture.

To make methanol from carbon dioxide, you need a source of hydrogen, since methanol is partly made of hydrogen. Hydrogen is also a fuel in its own right and provides the chemical energy needed to form methanol. Carbon Recycling gets its hydrogen by using electricity from the geothermal power plant to split water. Tran says that the process will be profitable by next year, when its five-million-liter methanol plant is operating at full capacity.

As the company thinks about expanding beyond Iceland, it is looking for other niches. The economics might work, Tran says, in places like Germany, where environmental policies have led to a glut of wind-generated electricity at night (see “Audi to Make Fuel Using Solar Power”).

Meanwhile, researchers are looking at other ideas for making carbon recycling profitable. Matthew Kanan, a professor of chemistry at Stanford, is developing catalysts that decrease the amount of energy required to turn carbon dioxide into useful chemicals, and also make it possible to produce chemicals more valuable than methanol, such as the chemical feedstock propanol. He says that with the price of electricity in Iceland, he could make a ton of propanol (which sells for about $3,200) with less than $800 of electricity.

The market for propanol, however, is relatively small. To make large-scale production of liquid fuel from carbon dioxide profitable, researchers are also turning to biology and genetic engineering (see “Making Diesel from CO2 and Sunlight”). Or they’re concentrating sunlight to heat catalysts up to extremely high temperatures to facilitate the reactions (see “Demonstrating a CO2 Recycler”). But biological approaches remain costly for now, and systems that use very high temperatures are prone to break down.

Technology alone probably won’t be enough to make fuels from carbon recycling viable, Kanan says. For fuel made from carbon dioxide to become widespread, governments will likely have to make it more expensive to emit carbon dioxide. “You can’t compete with oil out of a well,” he says.

26 comments. Share your thoughts »

Credit: Photograph by Colin Jaworski | MIT Technology Review

Tagged: Energy, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gases, methanol

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me