Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

Schiller said the resulting display makes graphics and images crisper than before. He also said the new screen has greater color saturation than the one on the iPad 2, and as a result, images look richer and more detailed. “Everything you do is just going to look stunning—surfing the Web, reading your e-mails,” he said.

Bringing such a high-resolution screen to the iPad isn’t easy. DisplaySearch analyst Richard Shim says it requires making the pixels smaller to pack more of them in the same amount of space—which must be done without shrinking the portion of the pixel that allows color manipulation—while still pushing enough light through them to reach the iPad’s screen. It’s hard to make such displays without any messed-up pixels, so the larger the display, the more difficult it is to produce. Apple had to elevate some pixels onto a different plane in order to avoid crossed signals.

The iPad will be run by a beefier processor, called the A5X chip. The iPad also is getting a better rear camera, with a five-megapixel sensor and the ability to take high-definition videos in 1080p resolution. Some new video features include image stabilization and temporal noise reduction.

In addition, more expensive versions of the iPad will be able to surf the Web on LTE networks, which makes activities like downloading photos and streaming videos much speedier. In the U.S., AT&T and Verizon Wireless will provide LTE service for the new iPad in the United States. Pricing was not available Wednesday.

Schiller said the battery life will remain the same. However, the new iPad is a smidgen plumper than the iPad 2; it’s 0.37 inches thick and 1.4 pounds, compared with 0.34 inches and 1.3 pounds for its predecessor, though I was hard-pressed to notice a difference when I briefly tried a demonstration unit. Videos seemed to be crisper, but it was hard to tell without a side-by-side comparison, which Apple didn’t offer at Wednesday’s event. Of course, not all videos, including much of what you see online, will merit such a sharp display.

7 comments. Share your thoughts »

Credit: Apple

Tagged: Computing, Apple, iPad

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me