Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Galves says most of the companies that received funding can afford to wait a few years for the market for lithium-ion car batteries to grow. The exceptions, he says, are Ener1 and A123 Systems. Ener1 is getting help from one of its largest investors, wood pulp mogul Boris Zingarevich, who also bought the automaker Think after it failed last year, and who plans for the company to restart electric-vehicle production.

A123 Systems, a relatively small, young company that got its start making batteries for power tools, faced a setback late last year when one of its major customers, the startup Fisker Automotive, decreased its orders, forcing A123 Systems to lay off workers. The company has other customers that could eventually take up the slack, but in the meantime, it is limiting the growth of its production capacity.

Like Ener1, some of the other companies that received government help don’t have major customers lined up. However, “they have very deep pockets,” Galves says. “If demand for batteries is not where it needs to be—if it comes two to three years later—that’s not a problem for them.”

Deutsche Bank predicts that, as a result of federal funding, battery production capacity worldwide will exceed demand until at least 2015. The prediction is significantly better than the forecast made in 2009, when it said capacity would be almost double demand in 2015. Since that earlier prediction, companies have decided to build smaller or fewer factories. The bank lowered its forecasts for electric-vehicle sales after weaker-than-expected sales of the GM Volt last year. It still expects the market to grow, however. “Every automaker has electric-vehicle plans. By the end of the decade, regulations essentially require them,” Galves says.

These predictions depend upon several assumptions about the growth of the electric-car market and the cost of battery manufacturing. Galves says that lithium-ion batteries for electric cars cost about $600 a kilowatt-hour, compared to $250 a kilowatt-hour for laptop batteries. “There’s no reason automotive batteries can’t get that low,” he says, but if these targets aren’t met, demand may not grow as quickly, and the overcapacity could last longer than expected.

Based on sales of about 20,000 to 30,000 for cars such as the GM Volt (compared to less than 10,000 last year), U.S. battery manufacturing capacity could exceed demand by five times or more by the time all of the Recovery Act money is spent, says Menahem Anderman, president of Advanced Automotive Batteries. That’s in part because much of the demand for automotive batteries will be met by Asian manufacturers, as it is today.

But a recent trend might help companies with factories in the U.S. compete with their Asian counterparts: automakers are seeking to reduce freight costs by using components made close to where cars are built, something that is particularly important with heavy lithium-ion electric-vehicle batteries.

72 comments. Share your thoughts »

Tagged: Energy, electric vehicles, A123, lithium-ion batteries, recovery act

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me