Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

A person living in upstate Michigan may gain significantly more from the death of analog television than someone living in New York City–at least, as far as long-range wireless Internet is concerned, a study suggests. On November 4, 2008, the Federal Communications Commission voted to allow the “white spaces” in the radio spectrum that were freed up by the analog television switch-off to be used for long-distance wireless Internet connectivity. This spectrum will be unlicensed, meaning any standards-compliant device can use it.

The most detailed analysis yet of the potential of these white spaces for long-distance wireless Internet has now been published by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley. Their models illustrate how the interaction of population density, television stations, and economics will determine what consumers ultimately get.

The decision to free up white spaces was warmly welcomed by companies including Google, Microsoft, and Intel because the lower-frequency signals in the newly released spectrum travel further and penetrate buildings more effectively than existing wireless data connections like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cell-phone links. (Google cofounder Larry Page has dubbed this kind of wireless connectivity “Wi-Fi on steroids.”) But unlike other commercial spectrum, the frequencies available to devices will not be the same in every location. Devices will instead have to use whatever spectrum is unclaimed by the digital television stations in their area. Although this is intended to make more efficient use of available spectrum, it makes the actual deployment of these white-spaces devices more complex, because they will need to avoid treading on the radio-frequency toes of local television broadcasts.

The FCC has drafted rules on the requirements for how devices might do that, with the final version expected late this year, and various electronics companies are already working on white-spaces devices. But the exact scale of the opportunity is still unclear, says Mubaraq Mishra, who conducted the new study with Berkeley colleagues Anant Sahai and Kate Harrison.

To get at what may be on offer to people who want to use white-spaces Internet, their model uses the FCC’s database of active television stations to calculate the usable white space available in each area. It also draws on census figures for the number of people living in each U.S. zip code. Including population data at the zip-code level makes their assessments unique, says Mishra, and more powerful. “White spaces are ultimately for people, not random locations, so we think it’s important to also incorporate that,” he says. “We wanted to know how many channels or how much bandwidth does a random person in the U.S. get.”

5 comments. Share your thoughts »

Credit: Mubaraq Mishra/Berkeley/IEEE

Tagged: Communications, Internet, broadband, FCC, white space, wireless broadband

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me