Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

A lack of support for Flash, which is ubiquitous on the Web, has been held up as a major differentiator by companies making competing tablet computers. But the mass market appeal of Apple’s products has encouraged many developers to find a ways to replicate the functionality of Flash using iPhone and iPad-compatible tools.

Brightcove, which serves video for a number of media companies, including Time and the New York Times, announced on Monday that customers can stream video in the iPad-friendly h.264 video codec, as an alternative to Flash. Re-creating the rest of the Flash-based online video ecosystem–including the profit-critical tools for analyzing user behavior and serving ads against videos–will take longer. Developers are using iPad-friendly tools such as HTML 5, CSS, and Javascript to accomplish this.

“We’re rebuilding that as fast as we can in HTML 5 to offer a roughly equivalent experience. It took four years to build that in Flash, and we’re thinking less than a year in HTML,” says Jeff Whatcott, senior vice president of marketing for Brightcove.

On April 10, Adobe will address the lack of Flash on the iPhone/iPad OS by releasing Creative Suite 5, which will include tools for converting Flash applications into iPhone and iPad compatible apps.

In addition to a larger screen and new interface conventions, the biggest different with the iPad is its significantly faster Apple-made A4 processor. Many of the first iPad apps will not push its limits, however, in part because the vast majority of developers have been forced to test their applications on an iPad simulator and not on the real thing. Lynch and his colleagues at Panelfly plan to use the iPad’s faster chip to power video and animation in the comics they distribute, but they won’t release their app until after they have tested it on a real device.

In this respect, developers porting applications from the slower iPhone platform have an advantage. For example, Phil Hassey, creator of a “real-time RISK” game called Galcon, which started as an iPhone app, was able to port the desktop version of his game to the iPad in just a few days.

If the satisfaction of a handful of iPad developers is any measure, Apple has already succeeded on one front, and happy developers should lead to a healthy ecosystem of applications for the iPad. Even the device’s deficiencies are opening up new business opportunities for third-party developers. “We think [the lack of Flash on the iPad] is actually a good thing for us because customers come to Brightcove when dealing with video,” says Whatcott.

7 comments. Share your thoughts »

Credit: Brightcove

Tagged: Computing, Apple, software, iPhone, iPad, iPhone app, development kit

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me