Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Genetic tests designed to weed out embryos that are unlikely to grow into healthy babies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) are often administered to couples receiving treatment even though it seems to have little impact on pregnancy rates. A new study involving higher-resolution genetic screening throws the practice into new doubt by showing that most of the cells in even healthy embryos have such chromosomal defects.

Evelyne Vanneste and her colleagues at the Catholic University of Leuven, in Belgium, used new, higher-resolution screening techniques to analyze cells from three- or four-day-old embryos from 23 fertile couples aged less than 35. Embryos are typically analyzed at this stage of development because less mature embryos contain less information, and more developed embryos are more difficult to transfer.

Vanneste and her colleagues found that more than 90 percent of the cells had some chromosomal abnormalities, a finding that goes some way toward explaining why humans have such low fertility rates in general. But it also means that some usable embryos may be discarded following screening.

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) usually involves either polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which detects genetic disorders by amplifying a specific chunk of mutated DNA, or fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), which allows chromosomes to be checked for structural flaws against normal chromosomes but cannot screen all chromosomes simultaneously. As a result, chromosomal problems that may prevent a successful pregnancy can be missed.

Vanneste and her colleagues used two newer tools–a SNP array and a BAC array–to look for chromosomal errors across the whole genome. The SNP array can identify variations in short pieces of DNA, while the BAC array can analyze larger chromosome chunks for structural errors. The team studied cells from 23 embryos taken from nine couples with normal fertility that were undergoing IVF treatment to exclude embryos with specific genetic diseases. To the researchers’ surprise, they found that 90 percent of the cells had duplicated or missing chunks of chromosomes. Not only that, but the errors changed in different cells taken from the same embryo.

This suggests that human embryos naturally have high chromosome instability, at least during the first few rounds of cell division. The same has been observed in macaques but not in mice, says Vanneste, and the evolutionary reason for it is not yet clear. “Possibly, instability is a mechanism that can rapidly generate genetic diversity, thus allowing more rapid adaptation to changing environments,” she says.

Vanneste’s results may partly explain humans’ relatively low fertility rate of about 30 percent, but the rate is still much higher than the 10 percent of apparently genetically normal embryos found by her team. This means that many embryos must go on to develop into healthy babies even though their chromosomes have defects at this stage. As the embryo grows, complementary mutations in its cells may compensate for each other, or cells without chromosome defects may preferentially populate the embryo.

The benefits of preimplantation screening are already hotly debated, since chromosome errors occur frequently in older women who may produce few eggs to begin with which stand a worse chance of successful impregnation following invasive biopsies to remove cells for genetic screening.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Credit: Evelyne Vanneste

Tagged: Biomedicine, IVF, embryo, genetic screening, genetic tests, chromosomes

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me