The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
The same technology used in TNT detectors in Iraq is being adapted for airport security to sniff out liquid-bomb-making materials.
A company based in Stillwater, OK, has developed a detector for hydrogen-peroxide explosives, which are thought to be popular with certain terrorist groups. It is now working to place its liquid-explosives-detection technology in airports.
The need for such a device was highlighted last summer, when a plot to bomb airplanes using liquid-explosives ingredients was uncovered in the United Kingdom. ICx Nomadics, whose TNT detectors are now sniffing out explosives in Iraq, has developed a device that can sense hydrogen peroxide and the peroxide-based explosive triacetonetriperoxide (commonly referred to as TATP), which was used in the subway and bus bombings in London last year. The device is sensitive enough to detect peroxide even if it is inside a factory-sealed container, says Aimee Rose, a researcher with the company.
Rose says ICx Nomadics should be ready to start tests with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in a couple of months. If it passes those tests, the detector, based on chemically sensitive films, would represent a novel--and potentially far faster and more accurate--way to detect liquid explosives. The company's existing TNT detectors are based on a semiconducting polymer film that was developed in the lab of Timothy Swager, a professor of chemistry at MIT. The film creates a signal when TNT vapors bind to it (see "Stopping Roadside Bombs").
The DHS is now testing 10 commercial devices for detecting liquid explosives, according to DHS spokesman Christopher Kelly. The department uses four main types of technology: X-ray, acoustic/ultrasound, Raman spectroscopic, and electromagnetic. And all of these can detect liquid explosives through a sealed container. But these devices, while sensitive, tend to return too many false positives, making them impractical for use in airports.
My question is how is someone going to go on a plane with strong smelling chemicals (acetone and HCl) and use these in a mix without someone noticing it, form TATP in a reasonable amount of time (usually takes 24 hours to form enough to do any damage), and then filter the solid from the liquid solution and dry it (usually takes another 24 hours) all in the few hours they are on a plane? Also if they say TATP that means it has to be formed at low temperature to obtain the tricyclo isomer so they are going to need an ice bath or refrigerator. If they do this reaction at room temperature it will form faster in a few hours but you are getting DADP which is a dicyclo isomer and much more unstable, but this still doesn’t change the fact that it needs dried before it can be used as an explosive.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
iddo
4 Comments
Detecting TATP explosives
This is not the first technology to be able to identify TATP - this article covers the subject in-depth:
http://www.tfot.info/content/view/92/
Reply