Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

What Your Phone Knows About You

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Thursday, December 20, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

TR: What could be some benefits to all this measurement?

SP: You can really see things in a way that you never could before--a God's-eye view. One of the examples I've been stuck on recently relates to how transformative Google Earth has been. Imagine having something where you can see all the people moving around on a map. Think about SARS in Hong Kong. What if in a particular apartment building, nobody left for work that day? You could identify a major health problem in 12 hours instead of two weeks. Another example is the social health of communities. It's known that social integration, or how well people mix, correlates with whether or not a community is thriving. With reality mining, you can actually see social integration, as it happens or doesn't happen. Once everyone can see it, then you can start to have transparent political discussions. Why isn't the mayor putting more sidewalks and crosswalks in this area? Could more community events make the area more livable?

TR: This all gets very creepy very fast. How do you provide a sense of privacy in a world where cell phones are constantly logging your life?

SP: That's not a trivial thing. Do you really want your government to know about you to that level? It could stop SARS, but there's a big trade-off there. You could make this a much more transparent world where that's available to everybody. But we definitely need to talk about it and figure out a new deal for privacy--to use this data and not be abused. The typical way is to make sure people can opt into these services so that they aren't mandatory. Another thing is to make sure the personal data is removed from the information that anyone other than you sees. It comes down to needing to have open discussions about the implications of these things. The people making policies don't know what is possible, and they don't necessarily make policies that are in our best interest. You know, excuse the example, but I've been in a downtown somewhere and I don't know where the nearest bathroom is, or it's raining and I'd like a taxi. I'd give up a little bit of personal information to find these things. There are times when those services are really valuable. These capabilities are coming, but we have to come to a new deal. It doesn't do any good to stick your head in the sand about it.

TR: Right now, reality mining is mainly done as research projects. Where do you see the technology and applications in five years from now?

SP: One is personal health monitoring. This means that people get feedback on how well they're doing. This is really important in elder care. I see a reality check [coming] on e-mail lists and spam. How about I never get e-mail from a person I've never met? You can build whole systems based on real physical experience so it defaults the right way. I'm not saying any of this would be completely automatic; you could adjust it as you needed to. There's also the personal-coach aspect of this stuff. All of us have the experience of talking to other people in public, but it's hard to see yourself as others see you. Reality mining will help us see ourselves and, in an anonymous way, compare ourselves to peers. And I see organizations and companies using this to help people collaborate more effectively and do their jobs more efficiently.

Comments

  • Liberation or control?
    Congratulations for this interview. This is powerful stuff, and a look I just took at the to-be Nature paper confirms it. In the interview, however, Professor Pentland seems to strive to offer a view of reality mining as a personal, subjective, citizen-oriented technology, while it seems to me [and his paper does confirm] that most conceivable applications will be top-down, i.e. control-oriented or sociological at best. (To clarify: I think both classes of applications are powerful and mosttly welcome). Paolo Magrassi. Milan, Italy
    Rate this comment: 12345

    pmagrass
    12/20/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • For the bathroom idiots
    Do you guys read what this fellow is saying?

    "...I've been in a downtown somewhere and I don't know where the nearest bathroom is..."

    How about all the franchise food and drink stores, which are ubiquitous?...McDonald's, Dunkin Donuts, Starbucks, you name it. Bookstores like B&N, Borders etc., and many other type of stores have public restrooms too. And how about just simply asking a local person, a street vendor, a police officer etc.

    You know people went to bathrooms since time immemorial, and somehow they managed to do just fine, without building the creepiest and most invasive surveillance systems.

    I find it ridiculous to justify trading our freedoms for such trivial "problems" as finding a bathroom, or hailing a cab.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    12/20/2007
    Posts:418
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Big Brother
    And does anyone believe that the government is not mining such data today? They are mining data from the landlines with the help of those phone companies, as the news reported earlier this year. Internet use is also suspect. What is legal? Why do you want anyone to know such level of information on an individual?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    fiberman
    12/20/2007
    Posts:80
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Big Brother
      Anyone who thinks his datum is sacrosant is delusional.

      This is why I line my hats with tinfoil and fight alien abduction. Those blue pills are tastey.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Phineas
      12/24/2007
      Posts:93
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Double Click on Mobile
    One of the solution mentioned by the Author for privacy is to opt-out from the services. Most of the time I have seen that the parent contract allows most of the companies/ govt to use such information provided automatically.

    Also, what is the guarentee that...
    1. This is hack proof i.e. nobody will be able to hack in such a network and use the data for abuse.
    2. Combine this information with the profession/ additional information of the mobile user e.g. these signals are coming from security agency people and u know the deployment of forces.. another e.g. Most of the Tech Consultants with income group of XYZ went to this exhibition/ hotel/ bar and ordered XXX drink !!!
    3. Combine this information with your credit card !!!

    4. Imagine corporate companies using this for selling thr products !!

    Too Dangerous !!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Sundeep
    12/26/2007
    Posts:1
  • Phones, Social Network Mining
    This technology is of-a-piece with the mining referred to in the IBM network mining article.  I don't really want others to know who I know or where I am, or who I know that knows someone I don't want to know.  This is all creeping me out.  I think I've hit my Luddite threshold.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Deskdiva
    12/28/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.