The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Water Splitter: Daniel Nocera watches an apparatus that makes hydrogen and oxygen from water.
Donna Coveney
Researchers describe progress on technology for storing energy in the form of hydrogen fuel.
Anyone relying entirely on solar power or wind for electricity--say, in a remote location cut off from the grid--could use a cheap way to store power for use at night or when the wind isn't blowing. Today at the American Chemical Society meeting in Boston, researchers announced progress on one option: using electricity from solar panels or other sources to split water, producing hydrogen fuel that can be used to produce electricity anytime by means of a fuel cell or generator.
The researchers, led by MIT chemistry professor Daniel Nocera, say they've improved a system that uses potentially low-cost catalysts to facilitate a reaction in which electricity is used to break down water into hydrogen and oxygen, a process called electrolysis. Nocera says the catalysts could reduce the price of commercial electrolyzers to levels that are approximately 25 to 60 percent less than conventional electrolyzers and also make them practical for small-scale applications such as use in homes.
Nocera's work is part of an effort to mimic photosynthesis, the process by which plants convert sunlight into useful molecules. Using electrons to split water is a key step in artificial photosynthesis, and Nocera is attempting to commercialize this water-splitting step through Sun Catalytix, a startup he founded in Cambridge, MA. The reaction can be powered with electricity from any source.
Water-splitting reactions involve depositing separate catalysts on two electrodes. One catalyst facilitates hydrogen production; the other facilitates oxygen production, the most challenging part of the process and the one that limits its rate. Nocera first announced new oxygen-producing catalysts in 2008, but they didn't work very fast. Now, he says, they generate oxygen 200 times faster. The key is that his system now deposits the catalyst on a porous electrode, increasing the amount of catalyst in a given area. But the speed must increase 10 times to equal rates seen in commercial electrolyzers.
Whereas the catalysts used in commercial electrolyzers require acidic or highly alkaline solutions Nocera's can function in ordinary neutral water. Nocera says the catalysts can even work with water taken directly from rivers or the ocean, making them more consumer friendly and practical for small applications. He envisions a small $30 electrolyzer being linked to solar panels and a fuel cell or generator in parts of poor countries where there's no access to the electrical grid. In such settings, he says, the ability to use local water from rivers or the ocean would be a particular advantage, since pure water might be unavailable.
At this point, all cost figures are estimates: Sun Catalytix hasn't yet brought a product to market. John Turner, a research fellow at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO, says that Nocera's results are promising, but "many questions remain." For example, although initial tests show that the catalysts work with river water or seawater, the researchers haven't determined how long they'll last under those circumstances. "He's got a long way to go to show a commercial device," Turner says.
If the electrolyser is 80% (HHV) efficient and the hydrogen is converted to power in a 50% HHV efficiency fuel cell (equivalent to 60% LHV, which is usually quoted), the round trip efficiency is 40%, so the output power costs 2.5 times the input power. Li-Ion batteries are in the high 80% range for RTE, so any H2 based storage method will have to be very inexpensive to compete in a high load factor application.
So it would be Sun to electricity conversion with an efficiency of 40%.
In the case of a the Battery it would be, maximum PV conversion 20% max, and Battery 80% so it would be 16% max. Please explain. Thank you
The H2 route would be end up with power at PV efficiency x 40% whereas the battery woute would create power at PV efficiency x 80% (plus). If you don't cycle very often (eg once/year) and H2 storage+electrolyser is cheaper than battery then fine, but if you cycle this on a daily basis, the factor of 2 on RTE makes the battery look good.
Yes but Hydrogen can be stored in a simple metal tank or other large storage containers. I tend to see long tubular metal tanks for hydrogen storage at a local university facility.
Batteries are incredibly expensive compared to a metal tank to store the same total amount of energy. On top of that you can't get all the energy you store out. If you drain the battery completely, many forms of batteries are irreversibly destroyed. Car batteries included. THis is why hybrids have to oversize battery packs to avoid this happening, a serious tradeoff and disadvantage. If you drain a hydrogen tank, you simply fill it up again later.
Finally, the energy density of batteries is 1/70th to 1/35th according to articles here on TR, possibly improving eventually tho. So you'd need vast arrays of batteries to store the same energy a tank could. With no storage loss once converted.
Yes, you are correct about the H2 RTE, but the RTE of LiIon batteries is actually higher than you suggest. There are many LiIon chemistries (LiCo, LiFePO4, and so on), but I think most are >90% efficient at charge/discharge.
One reason that the H2 RTE is poor is that HHV/LHV ratio is particularly high for H2 (1.18). One starts with water and ends up with steam, and so the energy to boil the water has to come from somewhere.
IMHO, the most important aspect of this entire field is the ability to empower the individual: Nocerra's Personal Energy (PE). If the world goes from centralized control of energy (i.e. the Grid) to "Everyman His Own Master" can Personal Authority be far behind?
Sounds like Stan Meyers water fuel cell from the 90's..
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stan.html
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Gaetano Marano
246 Comments
>>> it's good, but... >>>
.
it's one of the most interesting technology around, but... it's hard to evaluate it because Nocera hasn't given any detail, so far, especially regarding the system used to separate the oxygen and the hydrogen, its efficiency and (very important) its SAFETY
however, if you have links to more detailed documents about this technology, please post them here, thanks
.
Reply