Briefing Fuels

Technology Overview

Making Cellulosic Biofuels Competitive

  • September/October 2010
  • By Kevin Bullis

This jar contains a sample of switchgrass, one type of cellulosic feedstock.
Charlie Neibergall/AP

As long as electric vehicles remain a niche, biofuels will be the most serious alternative to fossil fuels as a way to power cars and trucks. Millions of existing vehicles can run on fuels mixed with high concentrations of ethanol or biodiesel. The rest, hundreds of millions more in the U.S., can run on mixtures that include some ethanol.

Making vast quantities of biofuels without cutting into food supplies, however, means finding a way to use wood chips, corn stalks, and other forms of cellulosic biomass as feedstocks. Dozens of pilot and demonstration-scale plants for producing cellulosic ethanol have been built across the United States, and a few are planned abroad, including some in China. But it's still not clear when the technology will prove competitive.

Most approaches to making cellulosic biofuels require enzymes to break down cellulose into simple sugars, but these enzymes are expensive. Some companies have developed cheaper ones--Denmark-based Novozymes, for example, says it has lowered the cost by 80 percent over the past two years--while others are engineering microbes to create their own. An organism developed by Qteros, in Marlborough, MA, produces enzymes that convert cellulose into sugar and then turns that sugar into ethanol.

Another strategy is to try to get rid of the enzymes altogether. For example, Coskata, based in Warrenville, IL, uses gasification technology to break down biomass and municipal waste into carbon monoxide and hydrogen. It has developed organisms that can feed on this mixture and produce ethanol.

Other companies are trying to make fuels that resemble gasoline or diesel. BP and DuPont are developing a process for turning cellulose into butanol, an alcohol with properties similar to those of gasoline. LS9, in South San Francisco, has used synthetic biology to design organisms that can process sugars into something "essentially indistinguishable" from petroleum-based fuels such as diesel.

But these companies also need to build large biorefineries capable of producing fuels as cheap as gasoline, which has production costs of around $2.00 a gallon. The latest public data suggest that it costs between $3.00 and $4.50 to produce cellulosic ethanol that matches the energy content of a gallon of gasoline. The figure for corn ethanol is $2.40.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

terryrigger

1 Comment

  • 457 Days Ago
  • 11/04/2010

bio fuel

what the heck do people for get that the usa at one time raised hemp for seed it made a real good bio fuel and grew quite plenteful its the government that stoped the production of the fuel becouse the gas companys started crying becouse they were loosing $$$$$ i say start growing it again and use tho product for fuel and the by product for making paper and cloths and other things that the plant can be used for time to keep the government out of our way and let us develup a real cheap fuel and that is HEMP SEED OIL  thanks terryrigger

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lattice Power

Suntech

Twitter

Nissan

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement