Sun-soaked silicon: Researchers at the new Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis will work to optimize light-trapping silicon microwires, like these, to produce fuel from solar energy.
Nate Lewis, Caltech

Energy

Fuel from the Sun

The DOE funds a research center aimed at making artificial photosynthesis practical.

  • Tuesday, July 27, 2010
  • By Nidhi Subbaraman

The U.S. Department of Energy has awarded $122 million to establish a research center in California to develop ways of generating fuel made from sunlight. The project will be led by researchers at Caltech and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and will include researchers at various other California institutions, including Stanford University, the University of California, Irvine, and the University of California, Berkeley.

The goal, says Nate Lewis, director of the center and a chemistry professor at Caltech, is to commercialize fuels made using only sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide. For years, researchers have been exploring ways to mimic photosynthesis: the way a plant can capture solar energy and store it in chemical bonds by splitting water and carbon dioxide. But the pace has been slow. The new research center will employ rapid, automated experimentation methods to accelerate the process of discovering new catalytic and photovoltaic materials. "So instead of the few dozen choices for catalysts that we have, we want to be in a position to choose from millions of different candidates," says Harry Atwater, a professor at Caltech, and a team leader on the project.

One of the biggest breakthroughs in this area came from Dan Nocera's lab at MIT two years ago. Nocera, a professor of chemistry, developed a cheap catalyst that would split water and release oxygen. Researchers at other institutions have been working on other isolated parts of the photosynthetic process--for instance, designing materials that would trap light more efficiently, synthesizing catalysts for water-splitting that will be cheap and easy to make, and creating membranes to separate the resulting fuels from the starting compounds. Progress has been incremental, but has yet to produce a practical method for making fuels.

The new center will align isolated research into a single, focused collaboration, says Lewis. "There are various individual groups making progress on different fronts, but there is no one benchmarking these catalysts to determine which one is better than the other ones," says Lewis. To see solar energy become a scalable, economically viable reality, Lewis says, collaboration is "essential."

Advertisement

The first step is to set up two facilities--one on the Berkeley Laboratory campus and one on the Caltech campus. The two research stations will house the 150 researchers and 30 principal investigators who will work full-time on the project over the next five years. They will work to develop better catalysts, light absorbers, and energy-storage materials, and research how to assemble the various parts into a small prototype solar fuel generator.

Print

Related Articles

A Greener 'Artificial Leaf'

New device offers distinct advantages over previous attempts to improve upon natural photosynthesis.

Faster Catalysts Improve Hydrogen Generation

Researchers describe progress on technology for storing energy in the form of hydrogen fuel.

Solar Metamaterials

A Caltech group has created materials that could improve the efficiency of solar cells.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

devassocx

111 Comments

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

making fuel

likely to be an expensive boondogle for the
taxpayer with no practical result.

Reply

prime3end

13 Comments

  • 565 Days Ago
  • 07/29/2010

Re: making fuel

Nocera's team at MIT have already busted much of the hydrogen problem wide open.  Using cobalt and phosphate they have been able to cut the amount of energy required to crack open water into hydrogen and oxygen.  No other serious energy saving measure has ever been developed in electrolysis till Nocera's team did so.   The world , and this new venture, will improve on Nocera's work.  Hydrogen from solar and seawater is great. Hydrogen from co2 emitting fuels is stupid.  Not wanting to spend tax money on clean energy is treasonous and stupid, stupid, stupid.

Reply

simspeed

1 Comment

  • 533 Days Ago
  • 08/30/2010

Re: making fuel

I have been unable to find specific information concerning electrical power required for electrolysis utilizing this new catalyst. As a percentage what are the power needs relative to conventional methods?

Reply

TooMany

125 Comments

  • 562 Days Ago
  • 08/01/2010

Re: making fuel

Where is this anti-science coming from, Fox News?

It seems to be more and more prevalent these days. Scientists are a bunch of idiots who are boondogling the public. Right. This anti-science attitude is a prime contributor to the decline and fall of the U.S. It is promoted by people with a strange capitalistic ideology and little knowledge of either science or history.

Reply

mattgroom

290 Comments

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Every little helps

Having structure never hurt anyone and it will remove the nonsense advertising companies will do about how good their product is in the renewable field.

By having an independent,(university), researcher based community organised into a dedicated team will help in this emerging field.

As the technologies and sound understanding develops along with all key area of the life-cycle addressed we will see more spin-offs in the long-run.

I can only see this as a plus for people, investors and the renewable industry in general.

Reply

1mikeyob

4 Comments

  • 561 Days Ago
  • 08/02/2010

Re: Every little helps

The "independent (university) " . Although I would freely admit there is / has been & no doubt will continue to be major contrubitions from places of higher learning . Independent is not and it seems never will be nor should be used
Look at where the funding comes from , who owns the results . As always follow the money , everyone works for someone , when $ is involved .

Reply

bentoronto

10 Comments

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Alberta Tar Sands

If the big companies which are raking in billions of dollars in the Alberta tar sands (paying minuscule royalties), and making tons of CO2 in the process of extraction, why aren't THEY funding this kind of research? And in Alberta.

Reply

Advertisement

TooMany

125 Comments

  • 562 Days Ago
  • 08/01/2010

Re: Alberta Tar Sands

To state the obvious, because they are raking in billions of dollars.

Reply

El Zato

5 Comments

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Don't forget

"Don't forget what you already know". Why invest so much money and effort in producing new energy sources when we already have an alternative to oil? Natural gas works the same way, it's cheap and doesn't pollute.

Reply

lego70

1 Comment

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Re: Don't forget

Natural gas it's being used. There's tons of geseoducts, liquificators and regasifictors and many more are on it's way.

CO2 remains the issue with NG.

B.T.W. An engine running on LNG does not emit much less CO2 than an equivalent gasoline engine.

The talking is about reclaiming CO2 from the atmosphere and using it to make (carbon neutral) fuel.

Reply

3DTOPO

1 Comment

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Re: Don't Forget


Ever hear of "Carbon" or "Renewable"?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Twitter

Layar

iRobot

Google

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement