Nanosphere smear: Using a spinning rod to deposit an ink suspension of silica nanospheres is a simple way to create bumpy, nanotextured coatings like these three.
ACS/Nano Letters

Energy

Bumpy Coatings for Better Solar Cells

A simple method applies nanoscale texturing over large areas.

  • Thursday, July 22, 2010
  • By Katherine Bourzac

Nanoscale wires, pores, bumps, and other textures can dramatically improve the performance of solar cells, displays, and even self-cleaning coatings. Now researchers at Stanford University have developed a simpler, cheaper way to add these features to large surfaces.

Nanoscale structures offer particular advantages in devices that interact with light. For example, a thin-film solar cell carpeted with nano pillars is more efficient because the pillars absorb more light and convert more of it into electricity. Other nanoscale textures offer similar advantages in optical devices like display backlights.

The problem is scaling up to large areas, says Yi Cui, a Stanford professor of materials science and engineering who led the new work. "Many methods are really complex and don't solve the problem," says Cui. Lithography can be used to carve out nanoscale features with precise dimensions, but it's expensive and difficult. Simpler techniques, such as spin-coating a surface with nanoparticles or using acids to etch it with tiny holes, don't allow for much precision.

Cui's group adapted a process that's used commercially to manufacture flexible packaging. A rod wound with wires is used to evenly deposit a liquid coating containing silica nanospheres. The treated surface ends up with specific nanoscale structural properties.

Advertisement

Changing the size of the nanoparticles, using wires of different diameters, and applying subsequent chemical treatments can further modify the properties of the surface. The coating method is compatible with roll-to-roll processes used to print flexible devices on plastic, metal, and other materials, and it can also be used on rigid surfaces like glass.

In the journal Nano Letters, Cui reports that he and his group have made superhydrophobic surfaces and a proof-of-concept solar device. To make the solar cell, the researchers deposit metal and amorphous silicon on the bumpy surface. The result absorbs 42 percent more light than a flat surface that uses the same quantity of materials. Cui hopes the nanoscale texturing will make it possible to produce thin-film solar cells that use very little material but are still very efficient; he's made such devices in the past using photolithography and other complex manufacturing techniques.

"This work demonstrates a simple yet effective method for achieving controlled assembly of nanospheres over large areas," says Ali Javey, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley. "It could present a route toward improved efficiencies in thin-film solar cells, without increasing the cost or the process complexity."

L. Jay Guo, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of Michigan who is developing roll-to-roll printing systems, says that the method should be useful for solar cells and displays. "It uses a traditional wire-wound coating method, which is applicable to large-area substrates," he says. But he believes that the process, which can apply the bumpy surfaces at 0.8 centimeters per second, may not be fast enough for industry unless the Stanford researchers can speed things up.

Cui is now taking the work in two directions. His group is tuning the size of the particles and the distance between them to determine which characteristics are best for solar cells. He's also developing a coating for light-emitting diodes that he hopes will help liquid-crystal displays appear brighter.

Print

Related Articles

Printing Electronic Skin

University of California researchers are making sheets of speedy, low-power transistor arrays for sensors that match human skin's sensitivity.

A Simple Filter Could Make LCDs More Efficient

The new approach wastes far less light, saving energy.

Nanopillars that Trap More Light

The new design could lead to cheaper solar cells.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

TruckersResource

1 Comment

  • 562 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2010

It seem round would harvest more light.

Just from thinking about it,it does seem  if there is a round shape the chances of collecting more light would be greater! More surface area equals more collection..

Reply

mattgroom

284 Comments

  • 559 Days Ago
  • 07/25/2010

round

I dont understand solar, but id say that the extraction of electrons from a single point on a cell would not be as efficient as extracting the same electrons from a greater area!

Hence id say the tube is better than the bubble that focuses more easily.

They may be intimating this when they say any-old structure seems to improve the efficiency rate without knowing why.

I would surmise that the recharging of the face electrons is a limiting factor to the extraction of them. I presume the electrons deeper in the cell are somehow moving to the surface to be extracted in the solar process. Though i dont know precisely how it all works. Though heat/radiation would conceivably be the catalyst that adds energy to molecules thus allowing electrons to be released.

I also presume these electrons are captured perhaps by conductive wires running through the cells, though again i dont know.

I believe ive heard other people talk about hooking up a heat exchanger to the cells and extract any excess heat. Not sure how that is going to help if indeed the heat is helping the energy released from a cell.

Im wondering if lowering the pressure on/around a solar cell would affect the release of electrons and thus improve efficieny. (Just a thought) Be nice to see some data on that one being tested. It would have an effect just might not be a usable effect.

It might also be that a mix of different materials, chemicals or acids are likely going to be involved in the removal of lights energy from all frequency spectrums. So when are we likely to see a solar chemical stew in a beaker...

Reply

nphyx

2 Comments

  • 557 Days Ago
  • 07/27/2010

Re: round

Keep in mind you're not really "extracting electrons" - you're just creating a current. Electrons in a circuit aren't being created or consumed; they're just moving from areas of negative charge (where there are more electrons) to places of positive charge (where there are less). Devices that "generate electricity" are just pushing electrons around to create a current.

Here's a good article on how solar panels do it:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/solar-cell1.htm

I doubt this answers your original question, but it should clear up your mental model enough that you can better answer it yourself. :)

Reply

briang1621

170 Comments

  • 516 Days Ago
  • 09/06/2010

Only one way?

Isn't there other ways to make bumpy surfaces at a nano scale? Correct me ?
Thanks
Dr. Glassman

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

SpaceX

Applied Materials

ARM Holdings

Ushahidi

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement