Thick and thin: A scanning electron microscope image shows dual-diameter light-trapping germanium nanopillars.
Ali Javey, UC Berkeley

Energy

Nanopillars that Trap More Light

The new design could lead to cheaper solar cells.

  • Friday, July 16, 2010
  • By Prachi Patel

A material with a novel nanostructure developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley could lead to lower-cost solar cells and light detectors. It absorbs light just as well as commercial thin-film solar cells but uses much less semiconductor material.

The new material consists of an array of nanopillars that are narrow at the top and thicker at the bottom. The narrow tops allow light to penetrate the array without reflecting off. The thicker bottom absorbs light so that it can be converted into electricity. The design absorbs 99 percent of visible light, compared to the 85 percent absorbed by an earlier design in which the nanopillars were the same thickness along their entire length. An ordinary flat film of the material would absorb only 15 percent of the light.

Structures such as nanowires, microwires, and nanopillars are excellent at trapping light, reducing the amount of semiconductor material needed, says Erik Garnett, a research fellow at Stanford University. Nanowires and nanopillars use half to a third as much of the semiconductor material required by thin-film solar cells made of materials such as cadmium telluride, and as little as 1 percent of the material used in crystalline silicon cells, he says. These structures also make it easier to extract charge from the material. Overall, these improvements could make solar cheaper. "Reducing material costs while achieving the same amount of light absorption and hence efficiency is very important for solar cells," says Shanhui Fan, an electrical engineering professor at Stanford.

Many nanostructrued materials have complex designs and require cumbersome fabrication methods to deposit multiple layers, says Ali Javey, an electrical engineering and computer science professor at UC Berkeley who is leading the new work, which is posted in the journal Nano Letters. He says the technique to grow the nanopillars is relatively simple and low-cost.

Advertisement

The researchers make nanopillars two micrometers high, with bases that are 130 nanometers in diameter and tips that are 60 nanometers in diameter. They start by creating a mold for the pores in a 2.5-millimeter-thick aluminum foil. First they anodize the film to create an arrangement of pores that are 60 nanometers wide and one micrometer deep long. They then expose the foil to phosphoric acid to broaden the pores to 130 nanometers--the longer the foil is exposed to the acid, the broader the pores get. Anodizing the film again makes the existing pores one micrometer deeper, and this additional length has the original 60-nanometer diameter. Trace amounts of gold are then deposited in these pores as a catalyst to grow crystals of semiconductor material--in this case germanium, which is good for photo detectors--inside each pore. Finally, some of the aluminum is etched away, leaving behind an array of germanium nanopillars embedded in an aluminum oxide membrane

Javey says that this method of making nanopillars of varying diameters and shapes is simple compared to other approaches, which involve a complicated layer-by-layer assembly of materials, and complex materials that combine wires with metal nanoparticles.

Garnett agrees that Javey's method could be cheap, but says it's still too early to know if the method can translate to a large-scale manufacturing process. "The most exciting thing is proof that nanostructuring can dramatically increase absorption," he says.

By tweaking the arrangement of the pillars, it could be possible to make materials that absorb longer infrared wavelengths of light, which would be useful for making efficient, cheap infrared light detectors. Since submitting the Nano Letters paper, the researchers have also used the technique to make nanopillars of cadmium telluride, a material better suited for solar cells than germanium.

Print

Related Articles

Bumpy Coatings for Better Solar Cells

A simple method applies nanoscale texturing over large areas.

Material Traps Light on the Cheap

The flexible composite requires far less silicon than today's solar cells.

Nanopillars Boost Solar Efficiency

A new design can make more-efficient thin-film solar cells using existing manufacturing equipment.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

irjsiq

44 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

Nanopillars that Trap More Light

re. Nanopillars that Trap More Light . . .
What is the distance from the Laboratory to the Factory Floor?
Trapping 90% of 'Light'; What about 'Trapping' also the Heat, for some allied/energy production utilization?
Recent Solar Powered Flight of 26 hours, and that was without Your 90% Light Trappers . . .
And Boeing has completed the First 'Hydrogen Powered' Airplane flight!

I keep seeing a ICE Motor Vehicle which has No Exhaust! . . . Making it's Own Fuel 'On Demand' and on board and the vehicle!
Continuing 'Breakthroughs' in 'All Known' Energy Storage Systems and combining them would render as a 'Reality', the Vehicle which I continue to see in my mind!
Range would be of little matter or consequence, as not too many years ago, a 'Motorcar' did well to make 25-30 Miles/Day: Primitive Vehilcles; Primitive Engines; Primitive Parts; Primitive Tires; Primitive Roads!

After the Odometer passed 200,000 miles,I finally Changed the Spark Plugs (they were STILL in Fair Condition) in my 4-Cylinder 2002 Nissan Frontier (great Parts Technology) 3rd or 4th Set of Tires

. . . Plus: Burning only Oxygen enriched Hydrogen as Fuel, (All produced on board) keeps the Engine Oil very clean as there is No Carbon to deal with! And Engines treated with Newly Available 'Friction Reduction Media' at time of Engine Manufacture . . . virtually 'Infinite Miles of Life' for Motor Vehicle!

Out of the Lab! and On to the Road!
What is the distance from the Laboratory to the Factory Floor?
I keep seeing a (ICE) Motor Vehicle which has No Exhaust!

Roy Stewart,
Phoenix AZ

Reply

KeplersThirdLaw

11 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

Re: Nanopillars that Trap More Light

This is a forum of intelligible thought and discussion, not incoherent ramblings. Your post, which is well within your rights to post, makes no sense.

Reply

irjsiq

44 Comments

  • 567 Days Ago
  • 07/17/2010

Re: Nanopillars that Trap More Light

KeplersThi... 
Interestingly another reader contacted me directly!
Regarding an FC vehicle which his research firm is developing.
We are scheduled for a meeting Monday . . . when one turns over a stone, one never knows what the other side may reveal.
You have the option of bypassing anything submitted!

Roy, Phoenix

Reply

headshox

1 Comment

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

Re: Nanopillars that Trap More Light

WHAT? They found a way to make solar cells better which has more than just transportation applications.

Reply

richbham

3 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

Additional article by Javey

Javey et al. describe this work in an article published in March on the SPIE Newsroom website: http://spie.org/x39220.xml -- A 3D nanostructure for improved solar-cell efficiency.

Reply

KenGilleo

7 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

Old Nano Pillars

In the early 1970's, Ford tested a light-trapping finish called "Moth's Eye" (check out why moth's eyes are so black) as an anti-glare surface for smooth black dash boards. It was made by replicating (photopolymer process) a specially prepared alumina surface that was comprised of pointed pillars. Nano finishes and nano replication methods are much older than the terms.

Reply

profquatermass

57 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

As Seen on TV?

Is this the non-reflective surface demonstrated on BBC TV (a look at the science being developed at the Natural History Museum in London) a few months ago?

It showed a surface material _not_ reflecting glare from surrounding bulbs. It was very, very impressive!

Whilst the developers talked about benefits for solar cells and increasing efficiency, I thought of other uses we could use it for like PDA, spectacles, car wind screen, phones, TFT displays, etc.

This'll be big!


Reply

Advertisement

mattgroom

284 Comments

  • 568 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2010

glad to see

I believe forums like this have also motivated researchers to test ideas. I remember a long time ago talking about that it would better to have a 1% absorbtion rate while the light flittered around trapped in a pillar. Eventually all the photons would release there energy and thus release electrons. The tubes could be filled with different materials to test variations, including spacing and size tc.

It seems researches read forums and mull ideas around in there heads and then they themselves come up with interesting, radical and uptimately successful implementations. Equally they could sort through our rubbish and extract nuggets...who knows.

Reply

ericnordman

2 Comments

  • 562 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2010

2.5 mm foil?

It didn't seem right to refer to a 2.5-millimeter-thick aluminum as foil. Seems more like plate.  I suspect they were using 2.5mil (0.0025") thick foil and someone converted mil to mm. 
Absorbing 99% in visible is impressive but it would be good to know how much near infrared is absorbed.  Many solar systems concentrate light to provide both electricity and about half the energy is outside visible range.   

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Ushahidi

Calxeda

Amyris

A123 Systems

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement