The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Solar material: Caltech researcher Stanley Burgos uses a focused ion beam microscope to examine a new metamaterial. The material’s microscopic structure, visible on the computer screen, can be tuned to interact with light in unusual ways.
Stanley Burgos
A Caltech group has created materials that could improve the efficiency of solar cells.
In an advance that could lead to solar cells that more fully utilize sunlight, researchers at Caltech have designed materials that can bend visible light at unusual but precise angles, no matter its polarization. The scientists hope the materials are a step toward perfectly transparent solar-cell coatings that would direct all the sun's rays into the active area to improve solar power output.
Many groups are working on novel antireflective solar cell coatings in the hopes of getting more light into solar cells. The Caltech group, which includes Harry Atwater, professor of applied physics and materials science, and researcher Stanley Burgos, is addressing the problem by precisely tailoring the structure of materials at the nano and micro scales, creating "metamaterials" that exhibit optical properties that are not found in naturally occurring materials. In the most recent work, Atwater and his coworkers demonstrated a material that precisely controls the path of visible light regardless of the polarization of the light--a first for metamaterials.
The Caltech metamaterial is a metal film several hundred nanometers thick. The films are patterned with circular cavities, each of which surrounds a wirelike column made of the same material. The space between the wire and the cavity wall is filled with a second metal. Depending on the dimensions of the patterns, the material bends, or refracts, light of different colors to a different degree. Atwater says the goal of his project is to make films with a refractive index exactly equal to that of air. Such a material would not bend light at all but would transmit it perfectly, with no reflection. When light moves from one medium to another, it scatters--this is why a straw in a glass of water appears to be broken. There's a mismatch between the refractive index of water and air. A solar cell coated with a material whose refractive index is identical to that of air would reflect no light at all.
The films that Atwater's group is making are metallic conductors, and could also serve as the top electrode on a solar cell. Atwater says that while some metamaterial designs have been complex to make and involve multilayered structures, these single-layer films can be made using lithography and etching techniques commonplace in the chip-making industry.
The ability of the material to work with both polarizations of light is exciting, says Nicholas Fang, professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. But, he says, one of the major remaining challenges in engineering metamaterials is loss. As these metal structures interact with light, they lose energy to heat. This heat loss is so great in Atwater's current materials that just 40 percent of incident light passes through them.
For solar applications, Atwater says his goal is a metamaterial film that passes 90 percent of the light. To that end, his group and others in the field are developing ways to amplify light as it passes through metamaterials. Optical amplifiers are used in lasers and in telecommunications; incorporating them with thin films like Atwater's will enable metamaterials to find their way into practical applications in devices like solar cells.
scattering is not the same as refraction
The broken straw is an example of refraction--when light obliquely crosses the interface between materials with different refractive indices, it changes direction according to Snell's law. In some cases it is completely reflected (total internal reflection).
Is the light passing through the cavities filled with the second metal? Is the second metal heavier or lighter? and is the loss (or inefficiency) related to the cavity spacing?
cavity size is important, i hear they need to be sub wave length scale. apparently light in these nano volumes can create a wave in the electron gas of the atoms on the surface of the cavity. article doesn't really talk about the science of this much. likely they are trying to create polaritrons or surface plasmons,which i have seen as being credited as what causes the lensing or bending effects in meta-materials. i guess the second metal is there to create a dielectric junction, i'm interested in this and would like to see a treatment at a different level
Ms. Bourzac,
Could you please reference/source the original papers at the beginning/end of your articles so that we don't have to go about searching for papers that interest us? You would be saving us much time. Thank you.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
dmm
270 Comments
perpetual motion machine
So, they're going to amplify the light as it passes through the metamaterial, in order to increase the efficiency of the solar cell. And the energy required for this amplification will come from the electricity generated by the solar cell. Does anyone else see the problem here?
I'm hoping Ms. Bourzac just misunderstood the researchers, and will be able to fix the article.
Reply
Gnana
1 Comment
Re: perpetual motion machine
A Perpetual motion machine is where energy used in the process is greater than the energy Generated from system.
In this case the energy used by the amplifiers will be a small part of energy Generated by the Solar cells. Hope this will remove the suspicion.
Reply
dmm
270 Comments
Re: perpetual motion machine
No, that doesn't help at all. I know what a perpetual motion machine is. Read the last two paragraphs of the article. They say that 60% of the incoming light is lost, but they're going to make that up with amplification. Supposedly that amplification will make the devices useful for generating energy. That is nonsense.
Reply
IronGoober
3 Comments
Re: perpetual motion machine
I believe they meant that they will locally amplify the light. It will be amplified in some regions and reduced in intensity in others. They weren't claiming to defy the first law of thermodynamics.
Reply
dmm
270 Comments
Re: perpetual motion machine
Thanks for the idea. What you are describing is focusing, which could conceiveably increase the conversion efficiency. All solar cells give more electrical power if the light is brighter (obviously). For some devices, the increase in electrical power is nonlinear compared to the increase in light power. (E.g., Double the light power and you triple the electrical power.) So, one might be able to make up for a loss of light by concentrating the remainder. That may be what the researchers were trying to explain, but that's not what the reporter understood them to say. The article should be fixed.
Reply