The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
The process involves freezing old rubber and shattering it into small particles--resulting in new, low-cost materials.
Of the nearly 300 million tires discarded in the United States each year, more than half end up either as landfill or are burned for fuel in cement kilns and in other industries.
Lehigh Technologies of Tucker, GA, has developed a process for rejuvenating discarded rubber that could open up new recycling opportunities. If the company's technology catches on, it could carve out a billion-dollar market for high-performance recycled rubber.
Used rubber is hard to recycle because it is vulcanized--hardened and rendered chemically inert--by the addition of sulfur and other compounds to the material's long molecular chains. Small chunks of used tires can be partially melted and used as filler in asphalt, but devulcanizing rubber involves expensive chemical and thermal processes.
Lehigh Technologies instead shatters rubber into a fine powder using a process that involves freezing old rubber and smashing it to pieces. This starts with tires that have been torn into half-inch chunks using conventional shredding equipment. Lehigh mixes these rubber pieces with liquid nitrogen, cryogenically cooling the rubber to -100°C. The rubber is then fed into a high speed "turbomill" that shatters it into particles no more than 180 microns in size.
Creating such fine powder transforms the rubber from a highly inert filler material to one that can bond with other materials. "We deliver a huge increase in surface area relative to size, and that allows for a much more intimate mixing with other materials," says Lehigh Technologies CEO Alan Barton.
In 2006, Lehigh Technologies opened its first commercial facility, which has a capacity to produce 100 million pounds of rubber powder and to process four million tires per year. Sales of the company's products increased by 40 percent last year, but the facility is still operating at less than half capacity. Barton says that his firm has sold recycled rubber to a number of leading tire manufacturers. He estimates that 30 million tires now on the road in the United States are made in part with his company's recycled rubber, although only about 3 to 7 percent of all the rubber in these tires is their recycled material.
This is largely because Lehigh's rubber is still technically vulcanized. Carbon atoms in the rubber are still bound to sulfur atoms, and these bonds prevent them from forming covalent bonds with surrounding materials.
The company recently opened an in-house research center that is looking to change the chemical properties of powders it produces, to make their surfaces more reactive. The company has also developed ways to make recycled rubber bind to surrounding materials via noncovalent, intermolecular bonds.
Nearly a third of Lehigh's annual output also goes to specialty applications, from paints and coatings to injection mold plastics. Lehigh's PolyDyne and MicroDyne powders can be used to replace as much as 40 percent of the polymers that normally go into plastic.
PolyDyne, the larger and less expensive of Lehigh's two rubber powders, sells for just under 50 cents a pound; finer grained MicroDyne requires colder temperatures and higher milling speeds, making it significantly more expensive. PolyDyne is half the cost of nonrecycled synthetic rubber, a third of the price of natural rubber, and nearly half the cost of polypropylene, a polymer commonly used in plastic moldings.
This is an area that Lehigh's investors are particularly interested in.
"Pick whatever plastic product you want to make and it will have specific technical performance requirements," says Ben Kortlang a partner at venture capitol firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which recently invested in Lehigh Technologies. "Using a blend of PolyDyne and traditional materials, there will typically be a cost savings and, in many cases, a performance improvement. And many of these markets could be very, very large."
Hello MIT (My.TechnologyReview.com)
Crumb Rubber/Cryo-Style . . .
What a wonderful advancement for the World of
'Used-Up' Tires!
AND: Congratulations to "Lehigh Technologies" ! ! !
'Rubber'; meeting the road, again and again and again. As an reclaimed 'Landfill Nightmare', as re-used Rubber now meets, both 'In-the-Road' and 'On-The Road' . . . 'New relationships' for 'Old Rubber!
Thank You for Your continuing publication of very interesting 'rays of light, into the darkness of a World much in need of the 'Light' of Hope!
Who says:
"An Ant Can't; Move a Rubber Tree Plant!"
Roy Stewart,
Phoenix, AZ
This sounds like a very innovative company. It should be noted, however, that cryogenic grinding of rubber and plastics is not unique to this company. Nor is the idea of surface modification of the small particles produced, to allow them to bond with other components. Nevertheless, if Lehigh's technology can achieve significant cost or performance advantages, that makes a world of difference. The very small particle size achieved (microns rather than fractions of an inch) and the use of a "turbo mill" appear to be particularly unique aspects of their technology.
Recycling polymers can be extremely hard on the equipment used, wearing out the components in direct contact with the material being downsized. Depending on the process, replacement of these components can be a significant economic obstacle. Also, mechanical particle size reduction generates heat and shearing forces, both of which tend to reduce polymer chain length and, hence, performance properties of the output material. At low temperatures, polymer chain mobility is reduced, making the material more brittle. This makes it easier to reduce size by tearing action (granulators), smashing (hammer mills) or crushing (cracker mills). The last two methods won't work on rubber unless its cooled below its "glass transition" temperature.
Re: Cryogenic milling/grinding
I agree, this approach has been around for many years. An Ontario company called Recovery Technologies does the exact same thing, though I'm not sure they're still operational. The tires they shattered into rubber dust/fragments have been used as fake dirt for major indoor sports stadiums across North America. I've seen the plant in action, and it's quite cool -- excuse the pun -- seeing the hammer shatter the frozen rubber bits.
Re: Cryogenic milling/grinding
In fact crio is not an innovation:
I did start up of a recycling rubber plant (30 years ego) in EL SALTO, JAL. MEXICO to pulverize rubber tires by criogenics means, but inmediatelly we devulcanize powder, incorporating a propietary oil and steaming it (in pans) into an autoclave (for devulcanizing by braking Sulphur bridges so) ending up with an 100% recyclable rubber powder material,- with little loss on properties.
Next -by milling such powder- we produced devulcanized rubber slabs ready to send them for compounding into a Bambury mixers, prior, to reshaping and revulcanizing into molds to make all kind of recycled rubber products (floor mats, solid rubber cargo tires, hoses, bumpers, etc.) or partially mixed with raw rubber to make auto tires, all with very good quality.
However, there are actual technologies that properly used easier the way to devulcanize the powdered rubber -without using old steaming process-.
This rubber recycling company is just on time to reenter this huge green market.
I like to contact them. Do some one knows their e-mail addres or phone?
Proper data will be appreciated.
Re: Cryogenic milling/grinding
Mr. McKenna:
I , a venezuelan polymer and extrusion rubber engineers, was surfing through the net when I saw your comment on the article New Life for Old Tires.
I felt interested in helping you to approach to a solution in depolimerizing the carbon-sulphur bond of the micro rubber particles obtained by the cryogenic milling/grinding proccess above described.
the group you might contact is the the Petra Group in maylasia which has developed a Delink proccess to depolimerize the carbon-sulphurs bonds that come from vulcanization.
I hope this information would be valuable to your inquiry
feel free to contact
Daniel Rodriguez
Rubber&Polymer Engineer
mobile:58-414-4211492
home: 58-241-8710689
The article speaks of cross links and the challenges presented by them, I don't think that it makes clear that the powederization does not actually de-vulcanize.
Economics of Cryo-Recycle vs. Gasification to Liquids
Unless the author of the "Rubber Pellets Vs Ethanol" comment knows the ROI (return on investment) for either of these technologies it's hard to make comparisons between cryo-freezing tires to make micrometer sized polymers versus gasifying the tires to make syngas for conversion into liquid fuels.
I don't know the ROI for either of these technology, but I would suspect that the ROI for the plasma gasification followed by a biological conversion to ethanol (with distillation of the ethanol from the aqueous froth) has a much lower ROI than the cryo-freezing, and a much lower ROI than its main competitor (pressurized gasification of waste followed by downstream conversion to diesel with Fischer-Tropsch catalysts.)
I thought that this was a "retro" article
It's been stated here already, but Lehigh Technologies is pursuing "technology" that is decades old. The old Cryo-Grind type programs, focused upon by many industrial gas companies, typically threw up a red flag whenever tire grinders were involved. The opportunities tended to be fly by nighters and the economics were always dubious and low profit for high volumes of LIN. Not to mention a tendency for shady connections to less than stellar business backgrounds.
There is literally NOTHING in this article that can be claimed to be new! I'd suspect that Lehigh is either bamboozling someone for funding or has never read the prior art! Spare us the rehash of old technologies that state nothing new in their advancement! This reads like an article from the late 1970's!
See a brochure from a leader in this field, the copyright is 2004 but this has to be about the seocond or third update to the old original brochure from at least the late 1970's / early 1980's!
http://www.airproducts.com/NR/rdonlyres/DE19CA0C-7E3F-445D-BF72-D0B6DFDE77CD/0/CryoGrind_Size_Reduction_PlasticsandPigments.pdf
Why not interview others in the field first before you swallow a rah rah story and then write an article about a group pumping their rehashed tech.
Maybe the technology isn't new but I doubt that a venture capital firm with the standing of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers is going to be bamboozled out of their money. Those folks do their research.
This "old technology" may not have been economically feasible is the '70's and '80's when oil was cheap. Now it takes a lot more money to extract the remaining available oil. Plastic is made from oil - see the comments at the end of the article about market potential.
Great article. We will continue to look at ways in which we can reconfigure existing products into new ones, both in an effort to be innovative and environmentally-friendly. We are also increasingly looking to nature, too, to provide us with inspiration when it comes to new product development and efficiency.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
cloudmaster101
5 Comments
I like how US is starting to improve it's recycling capabilities as we waste a large quantity of resources on a daily basis.
Reply
Relaston@web.de
1 Comment
Our old German Technology
This supposedly new technology of Lehigh, we have installed already in 1997 in the Spreerelast AG.
In addition, we are since 1997 owners of the revolutionary and best rubber Devulcanising process in the world. Lehigh and Petra Group/Dr. Sehkar from Malaysia is 10 years behind our technology.
Now, King & Krieg Inc. from Tulsa/Oklahoma in front of Lehigh and Magnum D' Or Recouces Inc. with patent protection in the US, Canada and Europe too.
Reply
nickkler
1 Comment
Re: Our old German Technology
Why don't you read "RIPOFF" report of your company
http://www.ripoffreport.com/environmental-violators/german-rubber-indust/german-rubber-industries-ag-9pcc2.htm
Reply