Light materials: Cadmium telluride, a semiconductor that’s good at absorbing light, can be used to make inexpensive solar panels.
GE

Energy

GE to Make Thin-Film Solar Panels

Its entrance to the market could help make solar power cheaper.

  • Wednesday, March 24, 2010
  • By Kevin Bullis

GE has confirmed long-standing speculation that it plans to make thin-film solar panels that use a cadmium- and tellurium-based semiconductor to capture light and convert it into electricity. The GE move could put pressure on the only major cadmium-telluride solar-panel maker, Tempe, AZ-based First Solar, which could drive down prices for solar panels.

Last year, GE seemed to be getting out of the solar industry as it sold off crystalline-silicon solar-panel factories it had acquired in 2004. The company found that the market for such solar panels--which account for most of the solar panels sold worldwide--was too competitive for a relative newcomer, says Danielle Merfeld, GE's solar technology platform leader.

She says cadmium-telluride solar is attractive to GE in part because, compared to silicon, there's still a lot to learn about the physics of cadmium telluride, which suggests it could be made more efficient, which in turn can lower the cost per watt of solar power. It's also potentially cheaper to make cadmium-telluride solar panels than it is to make silicon solar cells, making it easier to compete with established solar-panel makers. Merfeld says GE was encouraged by the example of First Solar, which has consistently undercut the prices of silicon solar panels--and because of this has quickly grown from producing almost no solar panels just a few years ago to being one of the world's largest solar manufacturers today.

GE will work to improve upon cadmium-telluride solar panels originally developed by PrimeStar Solar, a spin-off of the Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO. GE acquired a minority stake in the company in 2007, and then a majority stake in 2008, but it didn't say much about its intentions for the company until last week, when it announced that it would focus its solar research and development on the startup's technology.

Advertisement

"It definitely makes sense that they would avoid silicon at this stage," says Sam Jaffe, a senior analyst at IDC Energy Insights in Framingham, MA. Especially in the last year, the market for silicon solar panels has been extremely competitive, with companies making little or no profit. "There's a lot more space to wring profits out of making cadmium telluride."

Print

Related Articles

A Super-Absorbent Solar Material

A new material, patterned at the nanoscale, absorbs a broad spectrum of light and could make thin-film solar cells more efficient.

Printable Solar-Cell Material Reaches a Milestone

A performance boost for "small-molecule" solar cells could make the materials more practical.

Redesigning Solar Power

A new lab is inventing innovative ways to package and install solar cells, with the aim of making solar energy far more affordable.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Devere

32 Comments

  • 691 Days Ago
  • 03/24/2010

640 Jobs for Manufacturing Operators

I was checking out job openings at First Solar (the main company producing CdTe thin-film solar panels.)
They have 640 job openings for "Manufacturing Operators" in Kulim, Malaysia. There's another hundred or so in "Quality Inspectors", "Quality Technicians", "Shift Supervisors", etc.

That's a lot of job opening. When was the last time that you applied to a job in the US and saw that there are 640 job openings???

Crazy! Exciting, but crazy none the less.

Check out
http://tbe.taleo.net/NA3/ats/careers/searchResults.jsp;jsessionid=B25E1459B9D0E4C1B2D5C5C370872B4D.NA3_primary_jvm?org=FIRSTSOLAR&cws=1

Reply

DennisBuller

118 Comments

  • 691 Days Ago
  • 03/24/2010

Re: 640 Jobs for Manufacturing Operators

  Yes, it is very exciting that there are no jobs in the United States....

Reply

carlhage

84 Comments

  • 691 Days Ago
  • 03/24/2010

Re: 640 Jobs for Manufacturing Operators

Note that labor cost in panel manufacturing is only a small percentage of panel purchase price. (The manufacturing lines are mostly automated.) Much of the cost is raw material and capital equipment amortization, which leads back to many US jobs.

But PV installation labor costs are currently pretty high around $1/W (actually a problem) so amount to ~10X more jobs than panel manufacturing. Installation, of course, involves local jobs.

Reply

R.Blakely

16 Comments

  • 691 Days Ago
  • 03/24/2010

Amorphous silicon is a better choice...

Ideas are a dime a dozen. GE is going with a better idea. I think GE should develop silicon thin-film panels. Simply increasing the number of layers in a thin-film solar panel raises its efficiency. The trick is in the thicknesses of each layer in the stack, and in the materials used in all the layers.

Reply

yoatmon

30 Comments

  • 687 Days Ago
  • 03/28/2010

Thin-Film Solar Panels

Sorry to object but Graphene is by far the most promising alternative to Silicon.  First Graphene prototypes have already been proven.  It's just a matter of implementing a proper manufacturing process for industrial scale.  Graphene, which is based on carbon, is one of the most abundant terrestrial resources, cheap and unparalled for its electric attributes.

Reply

R.Blakely

16 Comments

  • 680 Days Ago
  • 04/04/2010

Re: Thin-Film Solar Panels

Crystalline solar cells are efficient because of excellent diode properties. Charge build-up in a solar cell is because of reverse flow of charge. A very short reverse-recovery time is needed, when charges can flow back across the depleted layer. But voltage can be increased by stacking cells. Stacking increases efficiency. But, in order to stack cells properly a well developed technology is required. The trick is to subdivide the cell into very many electrically separate diode stacks. 

Reply

ailakhani

4 Comments

  • 685 Days Ago
  • 03/30/2010

A bigger picture

It surely feels great to know that Cd-Te thin film modules have demonstrated its true potential of achieving production costs at less than $1 per Wp. 

What needs to be looked at, however, is the total cost of installation.  Thin film solar modules have notoriously low efficiencies - meaning you need larger foot print, bigger support structure, longer cables and guess what... special inverters to put the system together.  All this adds up to system costs close to crystalline module based installations.  Let not get into land rate appreciations and other missed opportunities due to higher foot prints.

Between First solar (lowest cost module) and SunPower (highest efficiency modules), I'll bet on the later to sustain over the long run.  Any other bets?

Reply

Advertisement

v.hg-770

2 Comments

  • 549 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2010

Re: A bigger picture

agree with you completely, except on the land issue - or, rather, NON-issue - there are more than enough rooftops and non-usable land - low biocapacity or brownfields - to go around...

Reply

bakerj

4 Comments

  • 625 Days Ago
  • 05/29/2010

Thinner? Still probably expensive. Why not cheaper?

Build you own solar panels CHEAP. I looked at solar panels a while back and they were as much as $1000+ each! Then I finally stumbled upon this site that shows you now only how to build your own solar panels, but wind turbines as well. It cost me just a little over $100 each per solar panel, which is more than twenty times less that some solar panels. For more info visit  http://8ac8d615gjld9o63blzc8m0teg.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=EARTH4

Reply

solarpanelsmake

1 Comment

  • 325 Days Ago
  • 03/25/2011

Making Solar panels

Just wondering if it will ever be practical and economical for the average person to make their own solar panels for home use.

I have read a few things online and have been looking at sites like this one: Solar Panels Make Sensible DIY project and I am intrigued. Can anyone out there comment on home DIY kits or guides to make solar panels at home?

thanks

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Pacific Biosciences

eSolar

PrimeSense

Crowdcast

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement