Pillar power: This microscope image shows the layers of a solar cell built on a nanopillar substrate. The core of each pillar is coated first with metal, then amorphous silicon, and then a transparent conductive oxide.
Solasta

Energy

Nanopillars Boost Solar Efficiency

A new design can make more-efficient thin-film solar cells using existing manufacturing equipment.

  • Wednesday, February 17, 2010
  • By Katherine Bourzac

Thin-film solar cells are less expensive than traditional photovoltaics sliced from wafers, but they're not as efficient at converting the energy in sunlight into electricity. Now a Newton, MA-based startup is developing a nanostructured design that overcomes one of the main constraints on the performance of thin-film solar cells. Solasta fabricates on arrays of nanopillars, rather than flat areas, boosting the efficiency of amorphous silicon solar cells to about 10 percent--still less than crystalline silicon panels, but more than the thin-film amorphous silicon panels on the market today. The company says that the design won't require new equipment or materials and that it will license its technology to amorphous-silicon manufacturers at the end of this year.

Solasta's solar architecture eliminates the tradeoff between thick and thin in thin-film solar cell design by separating the electrons' path from the photons' path. Light tends to reflect from thin-film cells without being absorbed. The thicker a cell's active layer, the more incident light it will collect, and the more free electrons it will generate. But the thicker the active layer, the fewer free electrons will make it out of the cell.

The cells designed by Solasta are built on a substrate forested with long, thin, vertically arrayed nanopillars. The pillars are coated first with metal, then with a thin layer of semiconducting material such as amorphous silicon, and then with a layer of transparent conductive oxide. Though the silicon layer is thin, a photon still has a relatively long path to travel down the length of the nanopillars, and a good chance of transferring its energy to an electron. Freed electrons then travel perpendicularly over a very short path to the metal at the core of each pillar, and shimmy down this electrical pole off the cell. "Electrons never have to travel through the photovoltaic material," says Zhifeng Ren, professor of physics at Boston College. "As soon as they're generated, they go into the metal." Ren founded Solasta with professors Michael Naughton and Krzysztof Kempa.

Advertisement

Other groups are also attempting to increase the efficiencies of thin-film solar cells by creating nanostructures that provide separate paths for electrons and photons. But the advantage of Solasta's nanopillar substrate is that it's compatible with the manufacturing techniques used to make today's thin-film solar cells, which are mostly built on glass using chemical-vapor deposition techniques. "We'll license to existing thin-film manufacturers to get them an efficiency boost without having to switch out their equipment," says Mike Clary, CEO of Solasta. "Other people are working on nanostructured surfaces to improve the performance in one way or another, but there's nothing close to these efficiency levels or this close to commercialization," adds Clary.

Print

Related Articles

Nanopillars that Trap More Light

The new design could lead to cheaper solar cells.

Material Traps Light on the Cheap

The flexible composite requires far less silicon than today's solar cells.

Solar Cells Use Nanoparticles to Capture More Sunlight

Optical antennas could help solar cells produce more energy.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

R.Blakely

16 Comments

  • 690 Days Ago
  • 03/19/2010

Boost using another method...

  Nanopillars boost efficiency because area of undoped silicon is greater. Another method to increase area is to use a stack of series-connected conventional cells. Each layer would need to be thinner to obtain the current-collecting advantage. A stack would capture more photons because of the stack's great thickness. Voltage would be greater for a stack, since current would flow vertically, and so less energy would be wasted conducting electricity out of the collector.
 

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Square

ARM Holdings

Groupon

HTC

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement