Energy

Bacteria Make Diesel from Biomass

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Thursday, January 28, 2010
  • By Katherine Bourzac

LS9's process is built on E. coli bacteria's metabolic machinery for converting sugars into fatty acids, which they then use to make other molecules. The advantage of working with E. coli is that the organism, a workhorse of molecular biology, is well known and easy to grow, says Keasling. And the bacterium's fatty acid pathway is more efficient at turning feedstocks into fuel than metabolic pathways used by other synthetic biology companies.

Fatty acids are a large class of molecules that can form the basis of many commodity chemicals and fuels that are conventionally derived from petroleum. These metabolic pathways are complex networks, and taking advantage of them required changing several of the bacterium's existing genes as well as adding new ones. After years of engineering, says Keasling, "we can get the molecule we want specifically."

Del Cardayre says LS9 has tested the diesel-production process at its 1,000-liter pilot-scale plant in South San Francisco using sugarcane as a feedstock. The company will scale the process to a commercial level at a 75,000-liter plant this year.

LS9 isn't the only company turning sugarcane into diesel: last year, another synthetic biology company founded by Keasling, Amyris Biotechnologies of Emeryville, CA, opened a demonstration plant in Campinis, Brazil. Amyris's process is based around yeast engineered to convert sugars into hydrocarbon-fuel precursors. Del Cardayre says LS9 may open a plant in Brazil as well, but because the new bacteria can convert cellulose, not just sugar, the company isn't tied to sugarcane or any other feedstock.

Jim Collins, professor of biomedical engineering at Boston University, says the question now is whether LS9's process will be cost-effective on a large scale. "As you go from 10 gallons to thousands of gallons, the biology changes, and analyses that worked well in the lab no longer work," notes Collins, because the microbes' environment changes. "The interesting question in the next few years is, which company can get their yields high enough, and get their processes up to scale to keep costs down," says Collins.

Print

Related Articles

Amyris Announces Commercial Production of Biochemicals

A leading biofuels company will begin making farnesene for cosmetics and fuel in Brazil.

Genes to Make Hydrocarbon Fuels

The startup LS9 reveals a discovery that could lead to biofuels that would work in conventional engines.

From Biomass to Chemicals in One Step

A startup's catalytic process converts biomass directly into components of gasoline.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

granitet

4 Comments

  • 748 Days Ago
  • 01/28/2010

Jim Collins comment

A Million liter production facility could just be 1000  1000 liter production lines. The scale ou could just having many lines where the process and environment work as expected. 

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 746 Days Ago
  • 01/30/2010

1000 1000 liter pdn lines

yes but the point in the article is that at 1000 liters, the plant is NOT cost effective.

it MUST be scaled up.

1000 production lines would mean ALOT more overhead than 10 production lines.  you have 100x more personnel, maintenance, etc with 1000 production lines.

Reply

bsudduth

5 Comments

  • 733 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: 1000 1000 liter pdn lines

1000 liter plants don't make a feasible production facility.  However, could small scale plants be mass produced for sale to individuals/businesses for personal scale production?

Reply

jjsmith

1 Comment

  • 745 Days Ago
  • 01/31/2010

also plastic to diesel

JBIGlobal.com is using a breakthrough technology to break down plastic to diesel and gasoline. You guys should be doing an article on them.

Reply

Devere

32 Comments

  • 742 Days Ago
  • 02/03/2010

Whoah...finally a possible breakthrough

I'm not a professional chemical engineer, so I'm not sure about the scalability of this process, but whoah!!!
I'm not a biologist either, so I'm not sure about how the bacteria convert the biomass to diesel, but this sure sounds exciting.
It's seems a lot better than biomass to ethanol because ethanol is hard to separate from water and the conventional oil pipelines can't transport it to markets.

Does anybody know if this biological process is cheaper than thermal processes? (such as gasification followed by Fischer-Tropsch catalysis to diesel)

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Netflix

American Superconductor

Geron

Facebook

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement