Clean machine: Researchers at the Technical University-Munich have used this test engine to demonstrate the simultaneous reduction of nitrogen oxides and soot, without a catalytic converter.
Sebastian Pflaum, Technical University-Munich

Energy

New Diesel Engine Emits Cleaner Fumes

Design cuts pollution--but is it practical?

  • Monday, December 14, 2009
  • By Erika Jonietz

A new engine designed in Germany reduces the pollutants in diesel exhaust emissions to barely measurable levels. The motor relies on extremely high fuel-injection and combustion pressures to burn fuel more completely--dramatically reducing both soot and nitrogen-oxide emissions.

Diesel engines use fuel more efficiently than gasoline engines and emit less carbon dioxide, but the trade-off is that they are usually more polluting. The higher combustion temperatures required to burn diesel lead to increased nitrogen-oxide emissions. And because diesel is heavy and less volatile than gasoline, not all the fuel is burned during combustion, resulting in the formation of soot particles. The worst offenders are buses and heavy-duty trucks.

Engineers at the Technical University-Munich (TUM) designed the new engine in a three-year project called Niedrigst-Emissions-LKW-Dieselmotor (NEMo), which translates to "lowest-emission diesel truck engine." Georg Wachtmeister, chair of internal combustion engines in the university's Department of Mechanical Engineering, led the effort. Using a single-cylinder research engine, Wachtmeister's team found a balance between exhaust gas recirculation, turboboost pressure, and fuel-injector nozzle configuration that allowed them to minimize both soot and nitrogen-oxide formation.

Modern diesel engines decrease nitrogen-oxide formation by cooling down part of their exhaust and recirculating it back into the combustion chamber (together with the fresh air used to burn the fuel). In this mixture, carbon dioxide and water from the exhaust gases moderate the combustion process, keeping the temperature in check. As a result, fewer nitrogen oxides are formed--but soot production increases, since the proportion of oxygen in the air-exhaust mixture is lower and the fuel burns less completely.

Advertisement

The TUM researchers designed their test engine so that the turbocharger compresses the air-exhaust mixture to 10 bar--roughly 10 times the atmospheric pressure at sea level--before introducing it into the combustion chamber. In contrast, mass-production engines can compress the mixture to a maximum of about 3.5 bar. Once compressed in this way, the air-exhaust mixture in the new engine contains enough oxygen for the diesel fuel to burn more completely. The maximum air pressure inside the combustion chamber is 300 bar, double that used in most production engines.

To offset the increased soot production caused by changing the exhaust-gas recirculation rate, the NEMo team modified the fuel-injector nozzle so that it atomizes diesel fuel at a pressure of over 3,000 bar, generating a fuel mist of microscopic particles that burns very quickly and practically soot-free. The most advanced production engines today use an injection pressure of about 1,800 bar.

Print

Related Articles

The Two-Stroke Engine, Reconsidered

Once thought too polluting, the two-stroke engine makes a comeback in advance of stricter fuel efficiency standards.

Fuel Sipping Diesel Hybrids to Debut in Europe

High fuel prices make the cars cost-effective in Europe.

Supercritical Fuel Injection

A supercritical diesel engine could increase efficiency and cut emissions.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

holoman

37 Comments

  • 793 Days Ago
  • 12/14/2009

We need REAL Clean Fuel

The is a band aid not a real solution.

Reply

aka_mythos

8 Comments

  • 793 Days Ago
  • 12/14/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Their design claims to eliminate the constituant parts that comprises over 90% of diesel's pollution. This is very significant. Combine this with reasearch into producing diesel from atmospheric CO2 and you have potential for an even more higly efficient energy supply chain.

Systemic efficiency of the energy supply chain is as much concern as the actual energy use. Right now the "clean" energy systems are inefficient and costly. I think a study to compare clean diesel to electrical conversion for vehicles would be crucial to making the sort of blanket statement you made.

Reply

Guest (-barrieglassford)

  • 793 Days Ago
  • 12/14/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Better than all of this, why not just burn the crude oil in a 95% thermal efficient power station and charge up electrical storage batteries large enough to power trucks fitted with high efficieny electric motors on each wheel.
the thermal efficiency of the very best internal combustion engine is is about 30%. This will give a massive saving alone, and you don't have to refine the crude to diesel fuel.

Reply

srmakowski

2 Comments

  • 793 Days Ago
  • 12/14/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Great idea. Have you decided where to site those power plants in Africa, South America, ...
Solutions have to be applicable to the land and population masses where the most development is required/will take place.

Reply

aka_mythos

8 Comments

  • 792 Days Ago
  • 12/15/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Power plants that derrive their power from combustian are relatively easy to refit. So you could use existing sites.

These types of engines would be ideal for large trucks. The trucking industry is composed of 200,000 commercial drivers yet consumes 60 percent of the fuel used on the road, almost all of which is diesel. If fully implemented in that industry, even with a 5% pollution inefficiency below current levels would be equivalent to having 3% less fuel use. This promises to be better. Almost negligable, you could elimate almsot 60% of fuel used on roads from the nations pollutions contribution.

Reply

stanger

1 Comment

  • 792 Days Ago
  • 12/15/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Best idea but there is a little problem concerning the capacity of accumulators. Storing as much energy in an accumulator as in a 50 litre fuel tank will lead to very very heavy cars and even heavier trucks. For example in the 200kg accumulator of a Toyota Prius the energy of about 0.14 litre diesel is stored!

Have a nice day

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 790 Days Ago
  • 12/17/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

batteries store 1/200th to 1/75th approx the energy of chemical fuels.

so massive truck batteries would cut efficiency of the truck drastically or very small batteries mean the trucks would have to recharge every 20 miles.

so your idea is eminently impractical.  and capacitors are not there yet either.

Reply

Advertisement

KeplersThirdLaw

11 Comments

  • 786 Days Ago
  • 12/21/2009

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

Can't forget that batteries have a finite amount of times they can be recharged. After a few thousand discharge/recharge cycles they have to be replaced. And thats EXPENSIVE!

Reply

libra58

4 Comments

  • 754 Days Ago
  • 01/22/2010

Re: We need REAL Clean Fuel

One such clean fuel alternative is DME:
See www.aboutdme.org/

Reply

pmclachlan

5 Comments

  • 793 Days Ago
  • 12/14/2009

Incremental improvement

This is a good example of how incremental improvement can deliver excellent results.  However it is addressing problems by adding complexity to the product that may not be viable in most applications.  It just might be more constructive to explore the viability of new devices that inherently offer solutions.  The strong construction and the thermal control of the internally water-cooled Pivotal piston in the Pivotal engine design is a technology that offers real potential to explore a new level of ICE development.  www.pivotalengine.com

Reply

tomgarven

43 Comments

  • 792 Days Ago
  • 12/15/2009

Some Good Ideas Here - Others Not So Much

I have a Dodge Ram Diesel truck and like the vehicle but it sure would be nice to have it burn cleaner. But instead of buying a new truck for about $36,000 I think what I will do is:

1. Change my cylinder head so I can use clean burning compressed natural gas.  Would cost me about $3,000 and I already know how clean compressed natural gas burns.  That should be good enough until most of the other parts of the truck have worn out.  Oh and did I mention we have a whole bunch of natural gas here in the good old U.S.A. and that I can buy it for about $2.50/gallon equivalent.

2. Next I would encourage everyone [including our government] to build railroad hubs so instead of burning billions and billions of gallons of diesel for over-the-road trucking we allow railroad locomotives that, you know the commercial, move 1 ton of freight, ?miles? on 1 gallon of fuel.

3. Then I would only use our existing fleet of 18 wheelers for regional deliver to local delivery hubs. This over-the-road stuff at 5-8 mpg is really not the smartest thing we have ever done in our country is it?   

Oh, and did I mention that we should also get off our behinds and start getting serious about renewable energy. It is no longer even about global warming - its about solar becoming cheaper than the next most cost competitive source of energy. You know if we play our cards right we wouldn't need imported oil in about 10 years.  Ah forget it, that would be expecting too much wouldn't it, LOL.

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 790 Days Ago
  • 12/17/2009

Re: Some Good Ideas Here - Others Not So Much

good ideas

railroads have been underutilized because the government has distorted the economy by not subsidizing them and heavily subsidizing local, regional and interstate roads, bridges, etc.

and while not so sexy, if we superinsulated all the buildings in the US it would reduce energy use 33%.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

A123 Systems

Square

Siemens

Amyris

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement