The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
Bakajin says this has been tried with more conventional membrane materials, but adding compounds for attracting carbon dioxide decreases the permeability of these membranes to the point that they are no longer practical. The extraordinarily high permeability of carbon nanotubes could help with this problem. "We have a lot of permeability to lose," she says. "If the permeability goes down as much as with other membrane materials, we're still fine."
She says the company has identified several promising candidates for modifying the nanotubes, but says the details are proprietary. In addition to selecting one of these, she says, the company is also working out how best to manufacture the carbon nanotube membranes, which includes deciding what material to use to bind the nanotubes together and serve as a support material. "Some have advantages in fabrication, some are better structurally, some are more resistant to harsh environments," she says. "The more we do it, the more we think of new things to try."
Bruce Hinds, a professor of chemistry at the University of Kentucky who has also demonstrated the high permeability of nanotube membranes, isn't convinced that carbon capture is the best use for these membranes, in part because of the challenge of making carbon nanotube membranes selective for carbon dioxide. He's starting with pharmaceutical applications--such as using the membranes to deliver drugs or to separate chemicals during drug manufacturing. These don't require large-scale manufacturing, which is good, since large-scale manufacturing of the membranes hasn't been demonstrated yet. The drug applications also command higher prices, allowing for more expensive materials.
Porifera is also pursuing other potential applications. It recently announced funding from DARPA, the research and development office for the U.S. Department of Defense, for producing portable desalination systems for soldiers. Carbon nanotubes can transport fluids 1,000 times as fast as conventional membranes. In addition to saving energy, such fast transport makes it possible to use much smaller membranes, which are better suited for portable devices.
Rather than capture and store the CO2 perhaps it could be mixed with water, and converted with artificial photosynthesis into liquid fuels. Or fed to algei to produce hydrocarbon fats. Twice burned carbon is a 50% reduction in greenhouse gases.
First of all, this carbon nano-tubes of my knowledge of the current industrial processes costs quite a bit and would be very difficult to compete with the existence pressure swing absorption or other techniques. This could be achievable, but not in 1 year as claimed by the company when it would be product ready.
There are many uses of carbon dioxide both industrially and agriculturally (green houses for vegetables). The culprit is NOx, SOx and H2S gases which is generally emitted along with CO2 when converting into energy.
It is an exaggerated technology
when the ends of nanotubes binds with CO2 molecules, how to collect these molecules together and transport them to certain burying location? It is an exaggerated technology, even it never will succeed.
if instead of developing technology to continue destroying the landscape and use a poluting fuel, we concentrated on capturing some of the kilowatt per square meter of clean engery delivered by the sun?
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
tomgarven
43 Comments
Excellent Discovery - Right Use.
First off this idea of using nanotechnology to capture CO2 is a good one.
Secondly I hope the use of this technology is only temporary - let's say for approximately another 10-30 years.
Hopefully by then we will have found cleaner and more economical renewable energy sources to eliminate the use of coal for 50% of our electricity.
That's my opinion - what's yours?
tomgarven@hotmail.com
Reply