Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Carbon Capture with Nanotubes

Startup Porifera is developing membranes to separate greenhouse gases from smokestacks.

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, November 30, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Membranes made with carbon nanotubes could reduce the amount of energy needed to capture carbon-dioxide emissions from smokestacks, and therefore cut costs, according to a company that will receive $1 million from the new advanced-research projects agency for energy, Arpa-e, to develop the technology.

The company, Hayward, CA-based Porifera, claims that its carbon-nanotube membranes could capture one billion to three billion tons of carbon dioxide a year and save $10 billion a year compared to existing CO2 capture technology. At this point, however, the work is at an early stage, says Olgica Bakajin, Porifera's chief technology officer. She expects that it will be another year before the first prototype is ready.

The company hopes to make use of some peculiar properties of nanotubes to capture carbon dioxide. Membranes for capturing CO2 from smokestacks need to have two features. They need to be selective, allowing carbon dioxide to pass through and not the other exhaust gases. This produces a concentrated stream of carbon dioxide that can then be compressed and stored. The membranes also need to be highly permeable--allowing CO2 to pass through freely to minimize the energy needed to pump it.

Carbon nanotube membranes are particularly good for this second property. Gases can move through the interior of nanotubes extremely quickly--at rates 100 times as fast as through conventional membrane materials, according to experiments Bakajin led at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Those results were published in the journal Science in 2006. As a result, membranes based on nanotubes would require far less energy than conventional membranes.

Story continues below


The challenge with carbon nanotube membranes is selectively transporting carbon dioxide and not the other gases in a smokestack. This is particularly difficult because the main component of flue gas, nitrogen has many properties that are very similar to CO2, says Karl Johnson, professor of chemical and petroleum engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. One approach to selecting the carbon dioxide is to bind compounds to the ends of the carbon nanotubes that chemically attract carbon dioxide but not other gases. Attracting the CO2 would create high concentrations of it near the membrane, increasing the amount of carbon dioxide that gets transported through relative to the nitrogen and other flue gases. Attaching these compounds is particularly easy because the ends of nanotubes have open locations for binding with such molecules, Bakajin says.

Comments

  • Excellent Discovery - Right Use.
    First off this idea of using nanotechnology to capture CO2 is a good one. 

    Secondly I hope the use of this technology is only temporary - let's say for approximately  another 10-30 years. 

    Hopefully by then we will have found cleaner and more economical renewable energy sources to eliminate the use of coal for 50% of our electricity. 

    That's my opinion - what's yours?

    tomgarven@hotmail.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tomgarven
    11/30/2009
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Capturing and stoing CO2
    Rather than capture and store the CO2 perhaps it could be mixed with water, and converted with artificial photosynthesis into liquid fuels.  Or fed to algei to produce hydrocarbon fats.  Twice burned carbon is a 50% reduction in greenhouse gases.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Pat495
    11/30/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • The key is Low Costs
    First of all, this carbon nano-tubes of my knowledge of the current industrial processes costs quite a bit and would be very difficult to compete with the existence pressure swing absorption or other techniques. This could be achievable, but not in 1 year as claimed by the company when it would be product ready.

    There are many uses of carbon dioxide both industrially and agriculturally (green houses for vegetables). The culprit is NOx, SOx and H2S gases which is generally emitted along with CO2 when converting into energy.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ammarj
    12/01/2009
    Posts:1
  • It is an exaggerated technology
    when the ends of nanotubes binds with CO2 molecules, how to collect these molecules together and transport them to certain burying location? It is an exaggerated technology, even it never will succeed.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gearss
    12/05/2009
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Wouldn't it be nice
    if instead of developing technology to continue destroying the landscape and use a poluting fuel, we concentrated on capturing some of the kilowatt per square meter of clean engery delivered by the sun?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TooMany
    12/12/2009
    Posts:58
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • carbon capture fabric
    Or  more specifically, using a catylitic screen to capture the carbon and create a carbon fiber fabric; dump the O2 into the atmosphere
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gordienj
    12/17/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.