The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
ZeaChem is just one of a number of companies pursing cellulosic biofuel production. Warrenville, IL-based Coskata is also developing a hybrid thermochemical-biological process. Its feedstocks are first gasified under high temperatures, yielding synthesis gas, a mix of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The synthesis gas is then digested by anaerobic bacteria that convert the gas directly to ethanol.
Wesley Bolsen, chief marketing officer for Coskata, says the company is getting yields of 100 gallons of ethanol for every ton of wood chips or carbon-equivalent feedstock at a pilot plant it recently opened in Madison, PA. "We can get one of the highest yields in the industry, and it's demonstrated yield, not theoretical yield," Bolsen says.
Mascoma, a cellulosic biofuels company based in Lebanon, NH, is pursuing an approach that uses genetically engineered microbes to simultaneously break cellulose into sugars and ferment the sugars into ethanol without the need for expensive enzymes. Michael Ladisch, chief technology officer for Mascoma, says its theoretical production limit is 100 gallons of fuel per ton of feedstock, but by having the microbes perform both tasks, the company has reduced cellulosic ethanol's production costs by 20 to 30 percent compared to conventional processes.
Mascoma is testing different engineered microbes at its pilot plant in Rome, NY, and Ladisch says the company plans to break ground on a commercial-scale facility in Kinross, MI, in the next year or two.
According to McMillan, all three approaches could play a role in future fuel production. "There is room for more than one winner here," he says. "If they can compete with the price of gasoline, then they can play."
Cellulose is the primary carbo source in this process. By converting the feedstock directly to acetic acid (vinegar right?), then combining hydrogen, you get a higher ethanol production.
If this process was applied to cane sugar where the potential fuel source is more pure, and converting to acetic acid and combining hydrogen, would this yield even more output from cane sugar that what's attainable today?
I'm for using waste products and cellulose of course, but if this technique can be licensed to Brazil, or used in Hawaii, then there is a potential revenue stream for you.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
aunderdown
77 Comments
Why is this cellulose-specific?
Really interesting stuff, but the article doesn't explain why the process is unique to cellulose conversion. The uniqueness here appears to be related to the use of specific microbes to convert sugars to acetic acid and subsequent conversion of acetic acid to ethanol. The thermochemical conversion of cellulose to sugars and the gasification of lignin to form hydrogen are utilized in the process but, if I understand the article correctly, are not unique to this process.
I'm not trying to downplay the innovativeness of combining these processes, but just asking:
Could the key sugar-to acetic acid step be just as useful for converting sugars from other sources to acetic acid/ethanol for use as fuels or chemical feedstocks (without the loss of carbon going to CO2)?
Reply
DeepOcean
8 Comments
Re: Why is this cellulose-specific?
As I heard, the regular way need HNO3 or HCl to erosion the cellulosic.
So in this way, they can make their own acids, save the money of HNO3.
Reply
aunderdown
77 Comments
Re: Why is this cellulose-specific?
I don't quite understand this explanation. Acetic acid, produced by the microbial process, is a weak acid, and seems an unlikely substitute for strong acids such as hydrochloric or nitric acid. Also, the article mentions the acetic acid being produced can be used as a chemical feedstock, e.g., for plastics manufacture. This is a higher value-added use than as a substitute for relatively inexpensive hydrochloric and nitric acids.
Reply