Bugging out: A pilot scale cellulose to ethanol plant is under construction by ZeaChem and partner Hazen Research in Golden, CO. The plant will soon pump out 250,000 gallons of fuel per year.
ZeaChem

Energy

A New Route to Cellulosic Biofuels

ZeaChem's pilot plant will make ethanol using termite microbes.

  • Friday, November 20, 2009
  • By Phil McKenna

Biofuel startup ZeaChem has begun building a biofuel pilot plant that will turn cellulosic feedstocks into ethanol via a novel approach that uses microbes found in the guts of termites. The company says the ethanol yields from the sugars of its cellulosic feedstocks are significantly higher than the yields from other biofuel production processes. ZeaChem says its process also has the potential to produce a plastic feedstock.

The company employs a hybrid approach that uses a combination of thermochemical and biological processes. It first uses acid to break the cellulose into sugars. Then, instead of fermenting the sugars into ethanol with yeast, as is typically done, the company feeds the sugars to an acetogen bacteria found in the guts of termites and other insects. The bacteria converts the sugar into acetic acid, which is then combined with hydrogen to form ethanol.

"It's a little more complicated than a conventional process. It's not the obvious, direct route, but there is a high yield potential," says Jim McMillan of the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO.

In more conventional biofuel processes, much of the carbon content locked up in the sugars is lost to the formation of carbon dioxide when the sugars are fermented into ethanol. Converting the sugars into acetic acid and then ethanol, however, yields no carbon dioxide. As a result, this method has the potential to raise biofuel yields by as much as 50 percent, according to ZeaChem.

Advertisement

What the company gains in sugar-to-ethanol conversion, however, comes at a cost elsewhere, says McMillan. In cellulosic fuel production, the feedstock typically goes through a pretreatment stage that separates out lignin, an energy-dense plant material. The lignin is then typically burned to produce the heat that drives sugar fermentation and other processes. With ZeaChem's approach, the lignins are gasified to yield the hydrogen that is later combined with acetic acid to form ethanol. Because of this, ZeaChem will likely have to make up the lost heat source elsewhere. "You may actually have to bring in more feedstock just to power your process," McMillan says.

ZeaChem CEO Jim Imbler says the company has achieved at a laboratory scale yields of 135 gallons per ton of feedstock, 35 percent higher than those of its competitors. Expanding from the lab to a 250,000-gallon pilot plant will go a long way toward proving the effectiveness of the process, and will also allow the company to test the production of another potential product: by swapping out its acetogen microbe for one that converts sugars into propionic acid, ZeaChem says it can combine the new acid with hydrogen to form propanol, a feedstock for plastic.

Print

Related Articles

What's Holding Biofuels Back?

Startups say reduced mandates for oil companies make it difficult to finance biorefineries.

Slow Going on Cellulosic Biofuels

ZeaChem starts construction in Oregon, but plans elsewhere have stalled or been scaled back.

Demonstrating a CO2 Recycler

Sandia scientists successfully test a machine that creates fuel from carbon dioxide.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

aunderdown

77 Comments

  • 817 Days Ago
  • 11/20/2009

Why is this cellulose-specific?

Really interesting stuff, but the article doesn't explain why the process is unique to cellulose conversion. The uniqueness here appears to be related to the use of specific microbes to convert sugars to acetic acid and subsequent conversion of acetic acid to ethanol. The thermochemical conversion of cellulose to sugars and the gasification of lignin to form hydrogen are utilized in the process but, if I understand the article correctly, are not unique to this process.
I'm not trying to downplay the innovativeness of combining these processes, but just asking:
Could the key sugar-to acetic acid step be just as useful for converting sugars from other sources to acetic acid/ethanol for use as fuels or chemical feedstocks (without the loss of carbon going to CO2)?

Reply

DeepOcean

8 Comments

  • 814 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2009

Re: Why is this cellulose-specific?

As I heard, the regular way need HNO3 or HCl to  erosion the cellulosic.
So in this way, they can make their own acids, save the money of HNO3.

Reply

aunderdown

77 Comments

  • 770 Days Ago
  • 01/06/2010

Re: Why is this cellulose-specific?

I don't quite understand this explanation. Acetic acid, produced by the microbial process, is a weak acid, and seems an unlikely substitute for strong acids such as hydrochloric or nitric acid. Also, the article mentions the acetic acid being produced can be used as a chemical feedstock, e.g., for plastics manufacture. This is a higher value-added use than as a substitute for relatively inexpensive hydrochloric and nitric acids.

Reply

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 817 Days Ago
  • 11/20/2009

Acetic Conversion

Cellulose is the primary carbo source in this process. By converting the feedstock directly to acetic acid (vinegar right?), then combining hydrogen, you get a higher ethanol production.

If this process was applied to cane sugar where the potential fuel source is more pure, and converting to acetic acid and combining hydrogen, would this yield even more output from cane sugar that what's attainable today?

I'm for using waste products and cellulose of course, but if this technique can be licensed to Brazil, or used in Hawaii, then there is a potential revenue stream for you.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Joule Unlimited

Cellular Dynamics International

Ushahidi

Facebook

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement