Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Superconductors to Wire a Smarter Grid

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, November 12, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Power shifting: Power comes into the Tres Amigas station from three power grids and circulates inside a superconductor pipeline that all three grids can draw from.
Credit: Tres Amigas

To connect all three grids required a place where they were geographically close together--in the case of Tres Amigas, a 60-square-kilometer swath of land near Clovis, NM. As with conventional connections between the grids, the system converts AC to DC. But unlike conventional two-way connections, at Tres Amigas that DC power will then circulate in superconducting cables that form a triangular electrical pipeline. Any of the three grids can draw power from this, as needed.

Providing five gigawatts, and eventually 30 gigawatts, of transfer capacity between all three grids required the use of superconducting DC lines, which greatly reduced the number of cables needed to carry the power--a single superconducting cable can carry the same power as nine or 10 sets of conventional copper cables. If the conventional cables were suspended overhead, they, along with the incoming and outgoing transmission lines, would have created a "rat's nest" vulnerable to weather and sabotage, says Jack McCall, a director of business development at Devens, MA-based American Superconductor, which is supplying the superconducting cables.

Burying conventional cables would add to the complexity and size of the project, since the cables would need to be kept several meters apart to avoid overheating. At first, only one superconducting cable would be needed--greatly simplifying the system compared to using conventional cables. As Tres Amigas is expanded, more cables will be needed, but these can be buried close to each other.

In addition to connecting the three grids Tres Amigas will serve as a demonstration of the type of DC superconducting lines and AC-to-DC converters that would be needed for high-power, long distance transmission lines--the superconductor "pipeline" EPRI has studied. Such a system could be easier to site than conventional overhead high-power transmission lines: the superconducting cables can be buried along existing rights of way, such as along interstate highways. Convincing land owners to allow large overhead transmission towers is one of the biggest obstacles to installing conventional transmission lines, and it could stymie efforts to develop a system for distributing wind power from the Midwest. Superconducting transmission lines could also be easier to integrate with the existing grid, since the amount of power converted from DC to AC power at stations along the line could be precisely controlled.

According to the EPRI analysis, a superconductor pipeline would cost about as much as a conventional transmission line, if the superconductor system were designed to transmit high amounts of power (greater than five gigawatts) over long distances (around 1,000 miles). This is in part because the cost for refrigerating superconducting lines (required to maintain their superconducting properties) becomes a small share of the total system costs. Also, at long distances, the higher efficiency of superconducting systems is important--about half as much energy is wasted as with conventional high-power, long-distance power lines.

But it is a technology that companies aren't familiar with, and so they may be reluctant to roll it out at the scale required for it to be cost-competitive, Eckroad says. The Tres Amigas project could be important to demonstrating that the technology works, he says.

McCall says that Tres Amigas plans to file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the coming weeks--clearing that regulatory hurdle is the next step for the company. If that goes well, the initial five-gigawatt system could be completed by the end of 2014.

Comments

  • Issues
    Don't superconducting materials require some rare earth metals?  And doesn't China now have a virtual monopoly on rare earth metals because environmentalists have blocked the type mining in the US needed to extract rare earth metals? 

    And wouldn't a single connection point be a very attractive terrorist target?

    RD
    11/12/2009
    Posts:125
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Issues
      Rd, smile when you say environmentalist, I'm an environmentalist who wants to protect my environment as well as yours, I do travel you know.  People throw around the word environmentalist like they  to used the word Liberal.  I believe that's a corporates smear tactic.  Funny how the so called environmentalists couldn't stop mountain top removal mining which is going on as we speak.
      Yes I'm an environmentalist, And you are?
      Sam

      ssamd
      11/12/2009
      Posts:5
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Issues
      If they are going like other American Superconductor (a company) projects it will be something like BSCCO-2223 which is made of bismuth, strontium, calcium, copper oxide, and a tiny bit of lead. None of which are "rare earth" elements. I know there are superconductors which do use all sorts of rare elements but power lines require a special mix of properties to stay superconducting at the desired power levels used in these lines. So even though there may be higher temperature conductors in the lab I am betting the one I listed is the one being used.

      As to the terrorism and grid security angle. These lines will likely be undergound and sufficently buffered and as it is expanded more and more redundancy will be added. Remember there is no special spot where all these regional grids come together so what you see as one facility is actualy three or more facilities linked by underground superconductor lines to form a power distribution and load balancing network.

      As to the other commentor on AC-DC-AC conversion. This is regularly done all over the world. High voltage DC transmission lines superconducting or not are more efficient in many applications. (long transmission lines, underground, or underwater, etc.) These efficiencies more than make up for the conversion losses and allow you to link grids which are not in phase.

      Gurthang
      11/12/2009
      Posts:23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.