Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Dye-Sensitized Solar to Go

The low-cost cells make their debut on electronics-charging bags.

By Prachi Patel

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The first commercial product to incorporate dye-sensitized thin-film solar cells will soon be on the market. Backpacks coated with the cheap, lightweight, and flexible solar cell, for on-the-go recharging of portable gadgets, were unveiled at the Hong Kong Electronics Fair last week.

Solar on the go: Flexible dye-sensitized solar panels incorporated into this bag make it capable of recharging electronic gadgets.
Credit: Mascotte Industrial Associates

The solar cells, made by Cardiff, U.K.-based G24 Innovations, are based on technology invented by Michael Grätzel, a chemistry professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland.

In this type of solar cell, dye-coated semiconductor nanocrystals are sandwiched between glass panels or embedded in plastic along with an electrolyte. The dye absorbs light and creates electrons, which are transferred to the semiconductor and then out into a circuit. Dye-sensitized cells have lower light-to-electricity conversion efficiencies than the best thin-film solar cells, but they are considerably cheaper to manufacture and can also be printed on flexible surfaces.

Grätzel says that dye-sensitized solar cells have further practical advantages over other thin-film solar technologies. Amorphous silicon thin-film cells degrade in sunlight over time, and their efficiency also goes down if sunlight hits them at an angle. Dye-based cells work well at wide angles and are longer lasting. Plus, they work more efficiently in indoor light, because the dye absorbs diffuse sunlight and fluorescent lighting well.

G24 Innovations says that it uses a low-cost, roll-to-roll process to make its flexible solar modules, which produce 0.5 watts of power under direct sunlight. Last week, the company shipped its first solar-module shipment to Hong Kong-based company Mascotte Industrial Associates, which makes the new bags. G24 uses ruthenium dyes coated on titanium dioxide nanocrystals and an iodide-containing nonvolatile electrolyte. The company's cells are over 12 percent efficient at converting light into electricity.

G24 plans to market modules that could be patched on clothing, tents, and awnings. The modules could also be cheaply incorporated into power-generating windows and billboards. "It's definitely a great moment for us," Grätzel says. "There has been talk of when the first commercial product will be coming out, and this has happened now."

Only one other company, Dyesol, is close to making commercial dye-sensitized solar-cell products. In October 2008, Dyesol opened a factory in Queanbeyan, Australia, to make tiles that can be integrated into building facades. Electronics giant Sony is also conducting research on dye-sensitized solar cells and announced last year that it had reached efficiencies of 10 percent--a level necessary for commercial products. The electronics maker showcased conceptual lamps based on these cells, but it doesn't have commercial products in the pipeline yet.

The solar cells may have a small niche in the market right now. But, says Michael McGehee, materials science and engineering professor at Stanford University, "in the future we may see this technology compete with the more traditional thin-film solar technologies based on amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, and cadmium indium gallium arsenide if the combination of efficiency, cost, and durability improves."

"It's an exciting time for dye-sensitized solar cells," Grätzel says, adding that he expects to see many more products on the market soon.

Other researchers, meanwhile, are working on advanced versions of the cells using nonvolatile electrolytes and organic dyes, which could make them even cheaper and more robust.

Comments

  • Is this practical?
    That .5W mentioned assumes the module is facing the sun, so you'll get that as long as you are walking north at noon, bending over so the backpack is perpendicular to the sun.

    A solar hat would be much more practical. Perhaps MIT could put them on the graduation caps and encourage alumni to wear them while walking outside with wires connecting to the belt-pack PDA/phone.

    When the backpack is not in the sun and in use charging, it's not generating power, so it would be doubtful to ever pay back the electricity of manufacture. So from a "green" point of view, it's a negative, other than perhaps advertising. From a cost standpoint, you are better off investing in utility solar and buying some extra batteries.

    A hand-crank flashlight/phone-charger only costs about $12. This would seem to be more practical than a solar backpack.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    carlhage
    10/21/2009
    Posts:21
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Benefits of DSSC Technology
    Hi Carlhage,

    I can see how you came to your argument if you base it purely on what you read in this article, however your knowledge of Dye-Sensitised Solar Cell Technology is limited (not meant to be disrespectful - if you haven't come across it much before you couldn't understand it?). You are correct that the 0.5w is based on direct sunlight, and were this a traditional type of solar technology the time of day and direction you were facing would have a huge impact on that figure. With DSSC technology that is far less important. I don't have the exact figures, but whereas traditional solar may drop from 0.5w for direct sunlight to say 0.001w facing the wrong way at sunrise or sunset, DSSC would only drop from say 0.5 to 0.4. Ie if there is any light, these backpacks will generate "close to" 0.5w, even indoors using artificial light sources...

    The article touched on this but didn't explain it very well. It talks in one paragrapgh about it being good at a wide range of light angles and that it's good at capturing diffuse light. To readers without much knowledge of DSSC technology, this won't have captured their attention. But rest assured, you could be sitting in the shade of a tree at 9am and these backpacks will produce a fairly high proportion of their max energy output.

    That's a major benefit that DSSC technology has over traditional solar and why I personally believe it will take the world by storm over the next few years. To find out more about it check out Dyesol's website http://www.dyesol.com/index.php?page=Home

    Cheers,

    Paul  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Maca01
    10/21/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Ruthenium is quite limited
    Ruthenium reserves worldwide are measured in mere tons. It's a noteworthy achievement that dye-sensitized cells have surpassed 10% efficiency, but the technology will be limited to small production runs based on limited supplies of ruthenium. If large amounts of this element were demanded by any industry, its price would shoot skyward as it has in the past.

    The same concerns are valid for CIGS and other exotic combinations for semiconductors used in thin-film PV. The materials are rare enough to predict that solar power based on them must be quite limited.

    In the end, the technologies that will give rise to vast amounts of needed solar power will be based on silicon, which is pratically unlimited. Technologies that supply silicon cheaply and reduce the amount of silicon needed per Watt of power will prove far more important in the long run than technologies based on rare or exotic elements.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    10/25/2009
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.